An Insiders' View of FCC Spectrum Auctions

After a long period of awarding spectrum licenses inefficiently, changes in the budget and budgetary process coupled with increases in the value of the spectrum for non-broadcast use led Congress to allow the Federal Communications Commission to award licenses through competitive bidding. Contrary to the perceived view of government bureaucracies as excessively cautious, the FCC used the newfound authority to adopt a novel approach to auction design—simultaneous multiple round auctions. The innovative auction design would not have been adopted without the successful collaboration between government economists and academic economists, who helped to formulate and refine the design so that decision makers at the FCC could be convinced that the novel technique was both superior and practical. The FCC's implementation of competitive bidding was not only rapid as mandated by Congress, but also much less costly than outside alternatives and allowed the integration of spectrum policy decisions and auction design. Experience from several auctions has led to a number of open questions and refinements. The FCC is trying to replicate the success with the original auction design by facilitating dialog between the agency and outside auction experts in order to address these issues.

[1]  Gregory L. Rosston,et al.  Using Market-Based Spectrum Policy to Promote the Public Interest , 1997 .

[2]  Thomas W. Hazlett,et al.  The Rationality of U.S. Regulation of the Broadcast Spectrum in the 1934 Communications Act , 1990, Review of Industrial Organization.

[3]  P. Cramton The FCC Spectrum Auctions: An Early Assessment , 1997 .

[4]  W. Sharkey,et al.  Auctioning the Airwaves: The Contest for Broadband PCS Spectrum , 1995 .

[5]  Thomas Schwartz,et al.  Congressional Oversight Over-looked: Police Patrol versus Fire Alarms , 1984 .

[6]  Gregory L. Rosston,et al.  Spectrum flexibility will promote competition and the public interest , 1995, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[7]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Valuing the Effect of Regulation on New Services in Telecommunications , 1997 .

[8]  G. Motta OMNIBUS BUDGET RECONCILIATION ACT , 1987 .

[9]  T. Hazlett Assigning Property Rights to Radio Spectrum Users: Why Did Fcc License Auctions Take 67 Years?* , 1998, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[10]  Thomas W. Hazlett,et al.  The Cost of Rent-Seeking: Evidence from Cellular Telephone License Lotteries , 1993 .

[11]  Charles R. Plott,et al.  Laboratory Experimental Testbeds: Application to the PCS Auction , 1997 .

[12]  Gordon Tullock,et al.  Private Wants, Public Means , 1971 .

[13]  Allen H. Barton,et al.  A Diagnosis of Bureaucratic Maladies , 1979 .

[14]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Putting Auction Theory to Work: The Simultaneous Ascending Auction , 1999, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  Fact and Fancy in Television Regulation: An Economic Study of Policy Alternatives , 1980 .

[16]  P. Cramton Money Out of Thin Air: The Nationwide Narrowband PCS Auction , 1995 .

[17]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information , 1981 .

[18]  J. M. Buchanan,et al.  The Economics of politics , 1978 .

[19]  W. Niskanen Competition Among Government Bureaus , 1979 .

[20]  S. Peltzman The Economic Theory of Regulation after a Decade of Deregulation , 1989 .

[21]  Mark M. Bykowsky,et al.  Mutually Destructive Bidding: The FCC Auction Design Problem , 2000 .

[22]  O. Williamson,et al.  Transaction Cost Economics , 1995 .

[23]  R. Weber Making More from Less: Strategic Demand Reduction in the FCC Spectrum Auctions , 1997 .

[24]  C. Goodsell The Case For Bureaucracy , 1983 .

[25]  Jesse A. Schwartz,et al.  Collusive Bidding: Lessons from the FCC Spectrum Auctions , 2000 .

[26]  C. Goodsell The case for bureaucracy : a public administration polemic , 1983 .