Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver version 5 (RECICL 2019 revised version)

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is inappropriate to assess the direct effects of treatment on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by locoregional therapies, such as radiofrequency ablation and transarterial chemoembolization. Therefore, establishment of response evaluation criteria solely devoted to HCC is needed in clinical practice, as well as in clinical trials of HCC treatment, such as systemic therapies, which cause necrosis of the tumor. Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver (RECICL) was revised in 2019 by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan based on the 2015 version of RECICL, which was commonly used in Japan. The major revised points of the RECICL 2019 are as follows: (i) CEA and CA19‐9 have been newly added as tumor markers that should be recorded for use as criteria in the response evaluation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; (ii) the criteria now state that the details of molecular targeted therapy should be specified; and (iii) specific methods for overall evaluation are now described. Also, as an assessment of overall TE4 requires that TE4 is achieved in all nodules (even non‐target lesions), the same calculation methods described above are used. We hope this new treatment response criteria, RECICL, proposed by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan will benefit the HCC treatment response evaluation in the setting of daily clinical practice and clinical trials as well, not only in Japan, but also internationally.

[1]  K. Ikeda Recent advances in medical management of hepatocellular carcinoma , 2018, Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology.

[2]  Y. Imai,et al.  Sorafenib plus low-dose cisplatin and fluorouracil hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus sorafenib alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (SILIUS): a randomised, open label, phase 3 trial. , 2018, The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology.

[3]  T. Meyer,et al.  mRECIST to predict survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Analysis of two randomised phase II trials comparing nintedanib vs sorafenib , 2017, Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver.

[4]  M. Kudo,et al.  Objective response by mRECIST as a predictor and potential surrogate end-point of overall survival in advanced HCC. , 2017, Journal of hepatology.

[5]  Y. Nakamoto Promising new strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma , 2017, Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology.

[6]  Tetsuya Ikemoto,et al.  Pathophysiology of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation , 2017, Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology.

[7]  T. Murakami,et al.  Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver (RECICL) (2015 Revised version) , 2016, Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology.

[8]  A. Russo,et al.  Prognostic Relevance of Objective Response According to EASL Criteria and mRECIST Criteria in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Loco-Regional Therapies: A Literature-Based Meta-Analysis , 2015, PloS one.

[9]  Y. Imai,et al.  JSH Consensus-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2014 Update by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan , 2014, Liver Cancer.

[10]  M. Kudo,et al.  Comparison of systems for assessment of post-therapeutic response to sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma , 2014, Journal of Gastroenterology.

[11]  M. Makuuchi,et al.  Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver (RECICL) proposed by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (2009 Revised Version) , 2010, Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology.

[12]  Riccardo Lencioni,et al.  Modified RECIST (mRECIST) Assessment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2010, Seminars in liver disease.

[13]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[14]  M. Yoshikawa,et al.  Comparison of CT findings with resected specimens after chemoembolization with iodized oil for hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  M. Palmer,et al.  WHO Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment , 1982, British Journal of Cancer.