Robust Texture Analysis Using Multi-Resolution Gray-Scale Invariant Features for Breast Sonographic Tumor Diagnosis

Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems in gray-scale breast ultrasound images have the potential to reduce unnecessary biopsy of breast masses. The purpose of our study is to develop a robust CAD system based on the texture analysis. First, gray-scale invariant features are extracted from ultrasound images via multi-resolution ranklet transform. Thus, one can apply linear support vector machines (SVMs) on the resulting gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM)-based texture features for discriminating the benign and malignant masses. To verify the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed texture analysis, breast ultrasound images obtained from three different platforms are evaluated based on cross-platform training/testing and leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO-CV) schemes. We compare our proposed features with those extracted by wavelet transform in terms of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The AUC values derived from the area under the curve for the three databases via ranklet transform are 0.918 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.848 to 0.961), 0.943 (95% CI, 0.906 to 0.968), and 0.934 (95% CI, 0.883 to 0.961), respectively, while those via wavelet transform are 0.847 (95% CI, 0.762 to 0.910), 0.922 (95% CI, 0.878 to 0.958), and 0.867 (95% CI, 0.798 to 0.914), respectively. Experiments with cross-platform training/testing scheme between each database reveal that the diagnostic performance of our texture analysis using ranklet transform is less sensitive to the sonographic ultrasound platforms. Also, we adopt several co-occurrence statistics in terms of quantization levels and orientations (i.e., descriptor settings) for computing the co-occurrence matrices with 0.632+ bootstrap estimators to verify the use of the proposed texture analysis. These experiments suggest that the texture analysis using multi-resolution gray-scale invariant features via ranklet transform is useful for designing a robust CAD system.

[1]  G E Mailloux,et al.  Local histogram information content of ultrasound B-mode echographic texture. , 1985, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  B. Goldberg,et al.  Ultrasound as a complement to mammography and breast examination to characterize breast masses. , 2002, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

[3]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[4]  E Fabiszewska,et al.  Comparison of results from quality control of physical parameters and results from clinical evaluation of mammographic images for the mammography screening facilities in Poland. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[5]  Gary W. Heiman,et al.  Basic statistics for the behavioral sciences , 2002 .

[6]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Improvements on Cross-Validation: The 632+ Bootstrap Method , 1997 .

[7]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[9]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Local binary pattern texture-based classification of solid masses in ultrasound breast images , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[10]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Breast ultrasound image enhancement using fuzzy logic. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  Wagner Coelho A. Pereira,et al.  Analysis of Co-Occurrence Texture Statistics as a Function of Gray-Level Quantization for Classifying Breast Ultrasound , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Pavel Crystal,et al.  Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  X. Zhao,et al.  Target Detection with Improved Image Texture Feature Coding Method and Support Vector Machine , 2008 .

[14]  Ethem Alpaydin,et al.  Introduction to machine learning , 2004, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[15]  André Victor Alvarenga,et al.  Complexity curve and grey level co-occurrence matrix in the texture evaluation of breast tumor on ultrasound images. , 2007, Medical physics.

[16]  R. Chang,et al.  Improvement in breast tumor discrimination by support vector machines and speckle-emphasis texture analysis. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  Dar-Ren Chen,et al.  Diagnosis of breast tumors with ultrasonic texture analysis using support vector machines , 2006, Neural Computing & Applications.

[18]  Konstantina S. Nikita,et al.  Comparison of Multiresolution Features for Texture Classification of Carotid Atherosclerosis From B-Mode Ultrasound , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[19]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[20]  Renato Campanini,et al.  Texture classification using invariant ranklet features , 2008, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[21]  Yu-Len Huang,et al.  Support vector machines in sonography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. , 2005, Clinical imaging.

[22]  Charles Henry Brase,et al.  Understanding Basic Statistics , 2003 .

[23]  Syed Abdul Rahman Abu-Bakar,et al.  Gray Level Co-Occurrence Matrix Computation Based On Haar Wavelet , 2007, Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualisation (CGIV 2007).

[24]  D Cavouras,et al.  Development of the cubic least squares mapping linear-kernel support vector machine classifier for improving the characterization of breast lesions on ultrasound. , 2004, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[25]  Harvey W. Kushner,et al.  Understanding basic statistics , 1980 .

[26]  Francesco Bianconi,et al.  Robust color texture features based on ranklets and discrete Fourier transform , 2009, J. Electronic Imaging.

[27]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. , 2008, JAMA.

[28]  Kazuhiko Hamamoto,et al.  Discrimination of Breast Tumors in Ultrasonic Images Using an Ensemble Classifier Based on the AdaBoost Algorithm With Feature Selection , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  B. Goldberg,et al.  Application of the compound probability density function for characterization of breast masses in ultrasound B scans , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  David A Clausi.  An analysis of co-occurrence texture statistics as a function of grey level quantization , 2002 .

[31]  Fabrizio Smeraldi,et al.  Retinal vision applied to facial features detection and face authentication , 2002, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[32]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis , 2004 .

[33]  J. Benson,et al.  Is screening mammography safe for high-risk patients? , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[34]  Stuart S Kaplan,et al.  Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. , 2001, Radiology.

[35]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[36]  Rebecca S Lewis,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. , 2004, Radiology.

[37]  Ruey-Feng Chang,et al.  Diagnosis of breast tumors with sonographic texture analysis using wavelet transform and neural networks. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[38]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Classifier performance prediction for computer-aided diagnosis using a limited dataset. , 2008, Medical physics.

[39]  Dong Xu,et al.  Bi-density twin support vector machines for pattern recognition , 2013, Neurocomputing.

[40]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[41]  Ruey-Feng Chang,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis for the classification of breast masses in automated whole breast ultrasound images. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[42]  Frederick J. Gravetter,et al.  Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences [6th ed.] , 2004 .

[43]  Ruey-Feng Chang,et al.  Automatic ultrasound segmentation and morphology based diagnosis of solid breast tumors , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[44]  A. Stavros,et al.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[45]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Identification of tumor epithelium and stroma in tissue microarrays using texture analysis , 2012, Diagnostic Pathology.

[46]  Hang Joon Kim,et al.  Support Vector Machines for Texture Classification , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[47]  Ruey-Feng Chang,et al.  3-D snake for US in margin evaluation for malignant breast tumor excision using mammotome , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[48]  Matteo Masotti,et al.  A ranklet-based image representation for mass classification in digital mammograms. , 2006, Medical physics.

[49]  Linda K. Olson,et al.  Improving the Accuracy of Diagnostic Breast Ultrasound , 2002 .

[50]  Leen-Kiat Soh,et al.  Texture analysis of SAR sea ice imagery using gray level co-occurrence matrices , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..