Satellite testing of a gravitationally induced quantum decoherence model

A test of quantum gravity Quantum mechanics and the general theory of relativity represent two pillars of modern physics, but unification of the two theories remains an open problem. Theories of quantum gravity abound, but they tend to lack an experimental foundation. One such proposed theory, event formalism, predicts that a pair of entangled particles decorrelate as they pass through different regions of the gravitational well of a planetary object. Xu et al. present results of a quantum optical test of this proposal using the quantum satellite Micius. Using entangled photon pairs, one sent to the satellite and the other retained on Earth, they find no evidence for the predicted decorrelation effects. The results may help shed light on the interplay between quantum theory and gravity. Science, this issue p. 132 The quantum satellite Micius is used to test and rule out elements of a proposed model of quantum gravity. Quantum mechanics and the general theory of relativity are two pillars of modern physics. However, a coherent unified framework of the two theories remains an open problem. Attempts to quantize general relativity have led to many rival models of quantum gravity, which, however, generally lack experimental foundations. We report a quantum optical experimental test of event formalism of quantum fields, a theory that attempts to present a coherent description of quantum fields in exotic spacetimes containing closed timelike curves and ordinary spacetime. We experimentally test a prediction of the theory with the quantum satellite Micius that a pair of time-energy–entangled particles probabilistically decorrelate passing through different regions of the gravitational potential of Earth. Our measurement results are consistent with the standard quantum theory and hence do not support the prediction of event formalism.

[1]  Friedman,et al.  Cauchy problem in spacetimes with closed timelike curves. , 1990, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[2]  Claus Kiefer Quantum gravity: general introduction and recent developments , 2006 .

[3]  Hawking Quantum coherence and closed timelike curves. , 1995, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[4]  Michael R. Vanner,et al.  Probing Planck-scale physics with quantum optics , 2011, Nature Physics.

[5]  H. Miao,et al.  Macroscopic quantum mechanics in a classical spacetime. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[6]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Closed timelike curves via postselection: theory and experimental test of consistency. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[7]  N. C. Menicucci,et al.  Fundamental quantum optics experiments conceivable with satellites—reaching relativistic distances and velocities , 2012, 1206.4949.

[8]  Jacob M. Taylor,et al.  Tabletop experiments for quantum gravity: a user’s manual , 2018, Classical and Quantum Gravity.

[9]  Dong He,et al.  Satellite-based entanglement distribution over 1200 kilometers , 2017, Science.

[10]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  Ground-to-satellite quantum teleportation , 2017, Nature.

[11]  J Fan,et al.  Invited review article: Single-photon sources and detectors. , 2011, The Review of scientific instruments.

[12]  A. Kent Causal quantum theory and the collapse locality loophole (7 pages) , 2002, quant-ph/0204104.

[13]  Hartle Unitarity and causality in generalized quantum mechanics for nonchronal spacetimes. , 1994, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[14]  Law,et al.  Continuous frequency entanglement: effective finite hilbert space and entropy control , 2000, Physical review letters.

[15]  Paolo Villoresi,et al.  Space QUEST mission proposal: experimentally testing decoherence due to gravity , 2017, New Journal of Physics.

[16]  K. Thorne,et al.  Wormholes in spacetime and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching general relativity , 1988 .

[17]  Politzer Path integrals, density matrices, and information flow with closed timelike curves. , 1994, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[18]  Deutsch,et al.  Quantum mechanics near closed timelike lines. , 1991, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[19]  S. Carlip Quantum Gravity: a Progress Report , 2001, gr-qc/0108040.

[20]  Timothy C. Ralph,et al.  Relativistic quantum information and time machines , 2011, 1111.2648.

[21]  S. Meyer,et al.  The Holometer: An Instrument to Probe Planckian Quantum Geometry , 2016, 1611.08265.

[22]  Politzer Simple quantum systems in spacetimes with closed timelike curves. , 1992, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[23]  Thorne,et al.  Billiard balls in wormhole spacetimes with closed timelike curves: Classical theory. , 1991, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[24]  David Edward Bruschi,et al.  Spacetime effects on satellite-based quantum communications , 2013, 1309.3088.

[25]  Miao Huang,et al.  Observation of ten-photon entanglement using thin BiB 3 O 6 crystals , 2016, CLEO 2017.

[26]  A. Datta,et al.  Quantum correlations of light mediated by gravity , 2019, Physical Review A.

[27]  T. Ralph,et al.  Quantum fields on closed timelike curves , 2011, 1110.3582.

[28]  Yongmei Huang,et al.  Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution , 2017, Nature.

[29]  Gerard J. Milburn,et al.  Quantum connectivity of space-time and gravitationally induced decorrelation of entanglement , 2009 .

[30]  Timothy C. Ralph,et al.  Entanglement decoherence in a gravitational well according to the event formalism , 2014 .

[31]  Ian A. Walmsley,et al.  Eliminating frequency and space-time correlations in multiphoton states , 2001 .

[32]  M. Aspelmeyer,et al.  Quantum superposition of massive objects and the quantization of gravity , 2018, Physical Review D.

[33]  Christoph Simon,et al.  Towards quantum superpositions of a mirror , 2004 .

[34]  Adrian Kent Nonlinearity without superluminality , 2005 .