Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model

Prior research documents the significance of using platform boundary resources (e.g. application programming interfaces) for cultivating platform ecosystems through third‐party development. However, there are few, if any, theoretical accounts of this relationship. To this end, this paper proposes a theoretical model that centres on two drivers behind boundary resources design and use – resourcing and securing – and how these drivers interact in third‐party development. We apply the model to a detailed case study of Apple's iPhone platform. Our application of the model not only serves as an illustration of its plausibility but also generates insights about the conflicting goals of third‐party development: the maintenance of platform control and the transfer of design capability to third‐party developers. We generate four specialised constructs for understanding the actions taken by stakeholders in third‐party development: self‐resourcing, regulation‐based securing, diversity resourcing and sovereignty securing. Our research extends and complements existing platform literature and contributes new knowledge about an alternative form of system development.

[1]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  A theory of digital objects , 2010, First Monday.

[2]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Dynamic structures of control and generativity in digital ecosystem service innovation: the cases of the Apple and Google mobile app stores , 2011 .

[4]  Kevin Boudreau,et al.  Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software 'Apps' Developers and Patterns of Innovation , 2011 .

[5]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity Volume 1 , 1999 .

[6]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Methodology for Analyzing Web-Based Qualitative Data , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[8]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Platform leadership , 2002 .

[9]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Path Creation in Digital Innovation: A Multi-Layered Dialectics Perspective , 2009 .

[10]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Invisible Engines: How Software Platforms Drive Innovation and Transform Industries , 2016 .

[11]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[12]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Research Commentary - Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It Takes Three to Tango , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Henry L Hu.  The Generative Internet（创生性的互联网） , 2010 .

[16]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Computing in Everyday Life: A Call for Research on Experiential Computing , 2010, MIS Q..

[17]  Alfred Kieser,et al.  Why Organization Theory Needs Historical Analyses-And How This Should Be Performed , 1994 .

[18]  K. Boudreau,et al.  How to Manage Outside Innovation , 2009 .

[19]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2011 .

[20]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[21]  Reinhard Prügl,et al.  Learning from Leading-Edge Customers at the Sims: Opening Up the Innovation Process Using Toolkits , 2006 .

[22]  Helen M. Smith,et al.  Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction 3rd Edition , 2006 .

[23]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  User involvement in developing mobile and temporarily interconnected systems , 2010, Inf. Syst. J..

[24]  LyytinenKalle,et al.  Research Commentary---The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation , 2010 .

[25]  Oscar Hauptman,et al.  Platform leadership , 2002 .

[26]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[27]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Digital Infrastructures : The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010 .

[28]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[29]  Joel West,et al.  Browsing as the killer app: Explaining the rapid success of Apple's iPhone , 2010 .

[30]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[31]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[32]  E. Brink,et al.  Constructing grounded theory : A practical guide through qualitative analysis , 2006 .

[33]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  Running in Packs to Develop Knowledge-Intensive Technologies , 2005, MIS Q..

[34]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[35]  Jan Bosch,et al.  From software product lines to software ecosystems , 2009, SPLC.

[36]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Structuring the Smartphone Industry: Is the Mobile Internet OS Platform the Key? , 2011 .

[37]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software 'Apps' Developers and Patterns of Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[38]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[39]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[40]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[41]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[42]  Joseph Lopreato,et al.  IDEAL TYPES AND THE IDEALIZATION STRATEGY , 1970 .

[43]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Governing Third-Party Development through Platform boundary Resources , 2010, ICIS.

[44]  Lisen Selander,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 2010 TRANSFORMING ECOSYSTEM RELATIONSHIPS IN DIGITAL INNOVATION , 2017 .

[45]  D. Silverman.  Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction , 1994 .

[46]  Ralph Katz,et al.  Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[47]  David G. Messerschmitt,et al.  Software Ecosystem: Understanding an Indispensable Technology and Industry , 2003 .

[48]  Klaus Pohl,et al.  Software Product Line Engineering - Foundations, Principles, and Techniques , 2005 .

[49]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  A Threesome Dance of Agency: Mangling the Sociomateriality of Technological Regimes in Digital Innovation , 2009, ICIS.

[50]  Klaus Pohl,et al.  Software Product Line Engineering , 2005 .

[51]  Andrew Hargadon,et al.  When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of the Electric Light , 2001 .

[52]  A. George,et al.  Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences , 2005 .

[53]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Towards a theory of organizational information services , 2008, J. Inf. Technol..

[54]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The power of product platforms : building value and cost leadership , 1997 .

[55]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[56]  N. Denzin.  The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[57]  D. Mitrany.  Methodology of the Social Sciences , 1945, Nature.

[58]  W. Orlikowski.  The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations , 2014 .