Supporting Decision Making and Action Selection under Time Pressure and Uncertainty: The Case of In-Flight Icing

Operators in high-risk domains such as aviation often need to make decisions under time pressure and uncertainty. One way to support them in this task is through the introduction of decision support systems (DSSs). The present study examined the effectiveness of two different DSS implementations: status and command displays. Twenty-seven pilots (9 pilots each in a baseline, status, and command group) flew 20 simulated approaches involving icing encounters. Accuracy of the decision aid (a smart icing system), familiarity with the icing condition, timing of icing onset, and autopilot usage were varied within subjects. Accurate information from either decision aid led to improved handling of the icing encounter. However, when inaccurate information was presented, performance dropped below that of the baseline condition. The cost of inaccurate information was particularly high for command displays and in the case of unfamiliar icing conditions. Our findings suggest that unless perfect reliability of a decision aid can be assumed, status displays may be preferable to command displays in high-risk domains (e.g., space flight, medicine, and process control), as the former yield more robust performance benefits and appear less vulnerable to automation biases.

[1]  S. Green,et al.  Tools for the operational management of inflight icing in the twenty-first century , 1996 .

[2]  S.M. Harris,et al.  Information Processing , 1977, Nature.

[3]  Stephen R. Murray,et al.  Deliberate Decision Making by Aircraft Pilots: A Simple Reminder to Avoid Decision Making Under Panic , 1997 .

[4]  R Parasuraman,et al.  MONITORING OF AUTOMATED SYSTEM , 1996 .

[5]  Peter Neumann,et al.  Safeware: System Safety and Computers , 1995, SOEN.

[6]  William R. Perkins,et al.  An Interdisciplinary Approach to Inflight Aircraft Icing Safety , 1998 .

[7]  N Moray,et al.  Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[8]  Gary Klein,et al.  The effect of acute stressors on decision making. , 1996 .

[9]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[10]  John D. Lee,et al.  Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Workload and Reliability of Predictor Displays in Aircraft Traffic Avoidance , 2000 .

[12]  Steve Green.  INFLIGHT ICING: THE HANDLING EVENT , 1998 .

[13]  Bruce G. Coury,et al.  Status or Recommendation: Selecting the Type of Information for Decision Aiding , 1990 .

[14]  Wayne W. Zachary,et al.  Decision Support Systems: Designing to Extend the Cognitive Limits , 1988 .

[15]  G. Klein,et al.  The Recognition-Primed Decision (RPD) Model: Looking Back, Looking Forward , 1997 .

[16]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .

[17]  Kathleen L. Mosier,et al.  Electronic Checklists: Implications for Decision Making , 1992 .

[18]  Rhona Flin,et al.  Decision making under stress : emerging themes and applications , 1998 .

[19]  Mustapha Mouloua,et al.  Automation and Human Performance : Theory and Applications , 1996 .

[20]  John M. Flach,et al.  5 – Information Processing , 1988 .

[21]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Stress and human performance , 1996 .

[22]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Compatibility and Consistency in Display-Control Systems: Implications for Aircraft Decision Aid Design , 1992 .

[23]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  12 – Aviation Displays , 1988 .

[24]  Marilyn Bohl,et al.  Information processing , 1971 .

[25]  David C. Nagel,et al.  Human factors in aviation , 1988 .

[26]  Jean MacMillan,et al.  A Comparison of Alternatives for Automated Decision Support in a Multi-Task Environment , 1997 .

[27]  Victor A. Riley,et al.  Operator reliance on automation: Theory and data. , 1996 .

[28]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[29]  Richard J. Hanowski,et al.  Driver Acceptance of Unreliable Traffic Information in Familiar and Unfamiliar Settings , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[30]  T. Landauer,et al.  Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction , 1997 .

[31]  Barbara J. Barnett.  Aiding Type and Format Compatibility for Decision Aid Interface Design , 1990 .

[32]  Bonnie M. Muir,et al.  Trust in automation. I: Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems , 1994 .

[33]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Attention and Trust Biases in the Design of Augmented Reality Displays , 2000 .

[34]  M. Endsley.  Automation and situation awareness. , 1996 .