Asking Today the Crucial Questions of Tomorrow: Social Robots and the Internet of Toys

Social robots and the Internet of Toys represent key technologies in children’s future lives. Based on Winfield (Robotics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012), we conceptualize the relationship between social robots and smart/connected toys with six characteristics: interactivity, energy, sensors, software control, movement and embodiment. These characteristics, in turn, help to classify social robots and smart/connected toys along three dimensions (i.e. horizontal, vertical and spatial integration), which suggests that the difference between social robots and smart/connected is rather subtle. We identify three common theoretical (absence or heterogeneity of theory, lacking developmental perspective, insufficient attention to intercultural differences) and three methodological issues (lack of standardized measures, study design issues, dominance of cross-sectional studies) that research on both social robots and the Internet of Toys needs to address.

[1]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Child-Robot Interaction: Perspectives and Challenges , 2013, ICSR.

[2]  Emiel Krahmer,et al.  Child-robot interaction across cultures: How does playing a game with a social robot compare to playing a game alone or with a friend? , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  From characterising three years of HRI to methodology and reporting recommendations , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[4]  E. Broadbent Interactions With Robots: The Truths We Reveal About Ourselves , 2017, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  Mark A. Neerincx,et al.  Integrating Robot Support Functions into Varied Activities at Returning Hospital Visits , 2016, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[6]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  T. Kuhn The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[8]  G. Mascheroni,et al.  The Internet of Toys: A report on media and social discourses around young children and IoToys. , 2017 .

[9]  Marcelo H. Ang,et al.  Why Robots? A Survey on the Roles and Benefits of Social Robots in the Therapy of Children with Autism , 2013, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[10]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Whose job is it anyway? a study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task , 2004 .

[11]  Alec J. Ross The Industries of the Future , 2016 .

[12]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[13]  Robbert-Jan Beun,et al.  Help, I need some body the effect of embodiment on playful learning , 2012, 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[14]  Chung-Ta King,et al.  Internet of Toys: An e-Pet overview and proposed innovative Social Toy Service Platform , 2010, 2010 International Computer Symposium (ICS2010).

[15]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[16]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  Why Would I Use This in My Home? A Model of Domestic Social Robot Acceptance , 2019, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  Sharing a life with Harvey: Exploring the acceptance of and relationship-building with a social robot , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Brian T. Gill,et al.  "Robovie, you'll have to go into the closet now": children's social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. , 2012, Developmental psychology.

[19]  D. Bickham Plugged in: how media attract and affect youth , 2017 .

[20]  Laurel D. Riek,et al.  Wizard of Oz studies in HRI , 2012, J. Hum. Robot Interact..

[21]  Donell Holloway,et al.  The internet of toys , 2017 .

[22]  Irene C. L. Ng,et al.  The Internet-of-Things: Review and research directions , 2017 .

[23]  Otto Raspe,et al.  On the Economic Foundation of the Urban Network Paradigm: Spatial Integration, Functional Integration and Economic Complementarities within the Dutch Randstad , 2009 .

[24]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Review of Human Studies Methods in HRI and Recommendations , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[25]  Patti M. Valkenburg,et al.  Adolescents and Pornography: A Review of 20 Years of Research , 2016, Journal of sex research.

[26]  J. Marsh The Internet of Toys: A Posthuman and Multimodal Analysis of Connected Play , 2017, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[27]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  An experimental psychological perspective on social robotics , 2017, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[28]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction: A Survey , 2013, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[29]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Toward sociable robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[30]  Tanya N. Beran,et al.  Understanding how children understand robots: Perceived animism in child-robot interaction , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[31]  Alan F. T. Winfield,et al.  Robotics: A Very Short Introduction , 2012 .

[32]  Shanyang Zhao,et al.  Humanoid social robots as a medium of communication , 2006, New Media Soc..

[33]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  A Cross-cultural Study: Effect of Robot Appearance and Task , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[34]  K. M. Lee,et al.  Can robots manifest personality? : An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction , 2006 .

[35]  Sebastian Thrun Toward a framework for human-robot interaction , 2004 .

[36]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  The role of social eye-gaze in children’s and adults’ ownership attributions to robotic agents in three cultures , 2015 .

[37]  Patric R. Spence,et al.  Initial Interaction Expectations with Robots: Testing the Human-To-Human Interaction Script , 2016 .

[38]  A. Pellegrini,et al.  Observing Children in Their Natural Worlds: A Methodological Primer , 1996 .

[39]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[40]  A. Przeworski,et al.  The logic of comparative social inquiry , 1970 .

[41]  David Westerman,et al.  Welcoming Our Robot Overlords: Initial Expectations About Interaction With a Robot , 2014 .

[42]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  “Theory of companions” What can theoretical models contribute to applications and understanding of human-robot interaction? , 2011 .

[43]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Plugged In: How Media Attract and Affect Youth , 2017 .

[44]  Giuseppe Colangelo,et al.  Vertical vs. Horizontal Integration: Pre-emptive Merging , 1995 .

[45]  Pawel Kaczmarek,et al.  Long-Term Cohabitation with a Social Robot: A Case Study of the Influence of Human Attachment Patterns , 2018, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.