Effect of wavelength change in microholographic recording

In microholographic recording, expensive laser diodes having no spectrum broadening (single mode) and no wavelength variation are used. On the other hand, in conventional optical disk systems, cheap laser diodes having spectrum broadening (multimode) and wavelength variation are used. It is a great advantage if the laser diodes for conventional optical disk systems can be used for microholographic recording. Therefore, the effect of wavelength change in microholographic recording was investigated through a numerical simulation. The laser diodes were modeled so that the full width at 1/e2 maximum of the spectrum was 0.8 nm and the center wavelength was 405 nm. The numerical aperture of the objective lenses was 0.85 and the thickness of the recording medium was 300 μm. The diffraction efficiency of the diffracted beam from a microhologram was calculated using the coupled wave theory and the following results were obtained. The diffraction efficiency decreased by three orders of magnitude by replacing single-mode laser diodes with multimode laser diodes, which makes it necessary to enhance the readout signal. The tolerance of the optical path length difference between the signal and reference beams was -50 ~ 110 μm, which makes it necessary to adjust the optical path length difference. The tolerance of the wavelength variation was 405 ± 0.5 nm, which makes it necessary to select the laser diodes. The conclusion was that it is not practical to use the laser diodes for conventional optical disk systems for microholographic recording.

[1]  Ken Anderson,et al.  Polytopic multiplexing. , 2004, Optics letters.

[2]  Kunihiko Hayashi,et al.  Recording Capacity Enhancement of Micro-Reflector Recording , 2008 .

[3]  Tatsuo Mikami,et al.  A Feasibility Study of 25 GB/Layer Dynamic Recording Using Two-Photon Material and Heat-Mode Bump Formation Method (Special Issue : Optical Memories) , 2013 .

[4]  Seiji Kobayashi,et al.  Analysis of micro-reflector 3D optical disc recording , 2006, Optical Data Storage.

[5]  Lambertus Hesselink,et al.  Microholographic multilayer optical disk data storage. , 2005, Applied optics.

[6]  Hiromi Kudo,et al.  Readout-signal amplification by homodyne detection scheme , 2007, Optical Data Storage.

[7]  Yuichi Komatsu,et al.  Three-Dimensional Recording with Electrical Beam Control , 2009 .

[8]  Shotaro Ichimura,et al.  Analysis of a collinear holographic storage system: introduction of pixel spread function. , 2006, Optics letters.

[9]  D A Parthenopoulos,et al.  Three-Dimensional Optical Storage Memory , 1989, Science.

[10]  H. Horimai,et al.  Collinear holography , 2022, CLEO/Pacific Rim 2003. The 5th Pacific Rim Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8671).

[11]  P. J. van Heerden,et al.  Theory of Optical Information Storage in Solids , 1963 .

[12]  Kanzo Okada,et al.  415 Gbit/in.2 recording in coaxial holographic storage using low-density parity-check codes , 2009, 2009 Optical Data Storage Topical Meeting.

[13]  Y. Kawata,et al.  Fabrication of multilayered photochromic memory media using pressure-sensitive adhesives. , 2006, Applied optics.

[14]  H. Kogelnik Coupled wave theory for thick hologram gratings , 1969 .

[15]  Alexander Dvornikov,et al.  Terabyte recorded in two-photon 3D disk. , 2008, Applied optics.

[16]  Hans Joachim Eichler,et al.  High-density disk storage by multiplexed microholograms , 1998 .

[17]  Taku Hoshizawa,et al.  1 Tbit/inch2Recording in Angular-Multiplexing Holographic Memory with Constant Signal-to-Scatter Ratio Schedule , 2013 .

[18]  Sven Frohmann,et al.  Volumetric optical storage with microholograms , 2009, 2009 Optical Data Storage Topical Meeting.