Are Some Comparative Nutrition Claims Misleading? The Role of Nutrition Knowledge, Ad Claim Type and Disclosure Conditions

Abstract As the regulator of all national food advertising, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has expressed concern that consumers may be misled by certain comparative nutrient content claims in advertising. To help examine this issue, primary food shoppers were recruited and interviewed in three U.S. markets according to generally accepted procedures for advertising copy tests. The study employs a 2 (ad claim type) x 2 (nutrition knowledge) x 4 (disclosure type) between-subjects design using manipulated print advertisements. Misleading generalizations for absolute levels of sodium content beyond that of control ads are found for both specific and general nutrient content claims from experimentally manipulated soup advertisements. Effects of certain ad disclosure types are found to be dependent on ad claim type and on nutrition knowledge levels. Conclusions from the study and implications for advertising practice and public policy are offered.

[1]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[2]  Scot Burton,et al.  Consumer Generalization of Nutrient Content Claims in Advertising , 1998 .

[3]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[4]  Manoj Hastak,et al.  Can the Educationally Disadvantaged Interpret the FDA-Mandated Nutrition Facts Panel in the Presence of an Implied Health Claim? , 1999 .

[5]  Ellen R. Foxman,et al.  Disclaimer Footnotes in Ads: Discrepancies between Purpose and Performance , 1988 .

[6]  Kenneth R. Lord,et al.  Attention versus distraction: The interactive effect of program involvement , 1993 .

[7]  Lewis Cj,et al.  Focus group sessions on formats of nutrition labels. , 1992 .

[8]  P. Daly The Response of Consumers to Nutrition Labeling , 1976 .

[9]  Kenneth R. Lord,et al.  Comparative and Noncomparative Advertising: Attitudinal Effects under Cognitive and Affective Involvement Conditions , 1994 .

[10]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. , 1988 .

[11]  E. Yetley,et al.  Focus group sessions on formats of nutrition labels. , 1992, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[12]  D. B. Smith The Economics of Information: An Empirical Approach to Nelson's Search-Experience Framework , 1990 .

[13]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Expertise , 1987 .

[14]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Consumer Learning: Advertising and the Ambiguity of Product Experience , 1986 .

[15]  M. Hoy,et al.  Structural characteristics of televised advertising disclosures: A comparison with the FTC clear , 1993 .

[16]  Paul J. Petruccelli Consumer and Marketing Implications of Information Provision: The Case of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990 , 1996 .

[17]  John L. Swasy,et al.  Consumer Skepticism of Advertising Claims: Testing Hypotheses from Economics of Information , 1990 .

[18]  Marc L. Resnick An Evaluation of Nutrition Label Quantifier Terms: Consumer Perceptions vs. FDA Definitions , 1997 .

[19]  C. Moorman The Effects of Stimulus and Consumer Characteristics on the Utilization of Nutrition Information , 1990 .

[20]  A. Abouchar The Theory of Optimal Multi-Product Output and Pricing under Joint Costs and Variable Technology , 1970, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  Gita Venkataramani Johar,et al.  Consumer Involvement and Deception from Implied Advertising Claims , 1995 .

[22]  Brian E. Roe,et al.  The Impact of Health Claims on Consumer Search and Product Evaluation Outcomes: Results from FDA Experimental Data , 1999 .

[23]  J. E. Russo,et al.  Identifying Misleading Advertising , 1981 .

[24]  William L. Wilkie,et al.  Marketing's “Scarlet Letter”: The Theory and Practice of Corrective Advertising , 1984 .

[25]  Jef I. Richards Advertising Research Issues from FTC versus Stouffer Foods Corporation , 1995 .

[26]  Darrel D. Muehling Comparative Advertising: The Influence of Attitude-toward-the-Ad on Brand Evaluation , 1987 .

[27]  C. Pechmann Do Consumers Overgeneralize One-Sided Comparative Price Claims, and Are More Stringent Regulations Needed? , 1996 .

[28]  Scot Burton,et al.  The Effects of Nutrition Package Claims, Nutrition Facts Panels, and Motivation to Process Nutrition Information on Consumer Product Evaluations , 1997 .

[29]  Peter Wright,et al.  Presidential Address Schemer Schema: Consumers' Intuitive Theories About Marketers' Influence Tactics , 1986 .

[30]  S. Fein,et al.  Nutrition knowledge levels about dietary fats and cholesterol: 1983-1988 , 1993 .

[31]  Scot Burton,et al.  Effects of Alternative Nutrition Label Formats and Nutrition Reference Information on Consumer Perceptions, Comprehension, and Product Evaluations , 1994 .

[32]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Consumer Use and Comprehension of Nutrition Information , 1977 .

[33]  Manoj Hastak,et al.  Can Consumers Interpret Nutrition Information in the Presence of a Health Claim? A Laboratory Investigation , 1996 .

[34]  Darrel D. Muehling,et al.  A Comparison of Children's and Prime-Time Fine-Print Advertising Disclosure Practices , 1998 .

[35]  Richard Staelin,et al.  The Effect of Nutritional Information Disclosure in Advertising: An Information Processing Approach , 1984 .

[36]  Raymond E. Schucker,et al.  Performance Characteristics of Seven Nutrition Label Formats , 1996 .