Geometrical convergence rate for distributed optimization with zero-like-free event-triggered communication scheme and uncoordinated step-sizes

This paper studies an event-triggered consensus-based distributed algorithm for tackling a kind of convex optimization problems, with a set of agents whose communication topology is described by an undirected and connected network. Each local objective function is held privately by each agent, and the target of each agent is to jointly minimize the total of its private objective functions. The communication process among agents in the network is driven by trigger condition in which each agent can only interact with its neighboring agents at some independent event-triggered sampling time instants. A double stochastic mixing matrix is employed in the algorithm which exactly steers all the agents to a global and consensual optimal solution even under uncoordinated step-sizes. Under two fairly standard assumptions that the objective functions are strongly convex and smoothness, we illustrate that the proposed algorithm successfully converges to the consensus and optimal solution at a geometric rate if only the uncoordinated step-sizes do not exceed some upper bound. We also prove that the convergence rate is able to be explicitly characterized. The Zeno-like behavior is rigorously excluded, that is, the difference between any two successive sampling time instants of each agent is at least two, reducing the communication cost by at least one half compared with traditional methods. Finally, the efficacy of the distributed algorithm and feasibility of our theoretical analysis are demonstrated by applying the distributed algorithm to a numerical experiment.

[1]  Robert Nowak,et al.  Distributed optimization in sensor networks , 2004, Third International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2004. IPSN 2004.

[2]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Dual Averaging for Distributed Optimization: Convergence Analysis and Network Scaling , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[3]  John S. Baras,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the Consensus-Based Distributed Subgradient Method Under Random Communication Topologies , 2011, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[4]  Lihua Xie,et al.  Augmented distributed gradient methods for multi-agent optimization under uncoordinated constant stepsizes , 2015, 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[5]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Distributed multi-agent optimization with state-dependent communication , 2010, Math. Program..

[6]  Munther A. Dahleh,et al.  Demand Response Using Linear Supply Function Bidding , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[7]  Alireza Hosseini A non-penalty recurrent neural network for solving a class of constrained optimization problems , 2016, Neural Networks.

[8]  Angelia Nedic,et al.  Distributed Optimization Over Time-Varying Directed Graphs , 2015, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[9]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Distributed Subgradient Methods for Multi-Agent Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[10]  Jan C. Willems,et al.  Feedback systems: Input-output properties , 1976, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  On Distributed Averaging Algorithms and Quantization Effects , 2008, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[12]  Xin-Ping Guan,et al.  Distributed optimal consensus filter for target tracking in heterogeneous sensor networks , 2011, 2011 8th Asian Control Conference (ASCC).

[13]  Wei Ren,et al.  Consensus based formation control strategies for multi-vehicle systems , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.