Projection optics for EUVL micro-field exposure tools with 0.5 NA

In last year’s report, we discussed the design and requirements of the optical projection module (Projection Optics Box [POB]) for the 0.5-NA Micro-field Exposure Tool (MET5) and the resulting challenges. Over the course of this past year, we have completed and fully qualified the metrology of individual mirrors. All surface figure errors have been measured over seven orders of magnitude with spatial periods ranging from the full clear aperture down to 10 nm. The reproducibility of the full aperture tests measures 16 pm RMS for the M1 test and 17 pm for the M2 test with a target of 30 pm for both tests. Furthermore, we achieved excellent results on scatter and flare: For scatter, both mirrors perform about a factor of two below specification. For flare, the larger M2 mirror performs well within and the smaller M1 mirror about a factor of two below specification. In addition, we have developed processes for correcting surface figure errors for both mirrors and have successfully demonstrated high-reflectivity coatings on pathfinder mirrors. Further, we have achieved significant goals with respect to the design, assembly, metrology and alignment of the projection module. This paper reviews this progress and describes the next step in the ambitious MET5 POB development program.

[1]  Kim Dean,et al.  The EUV resist test center at SEMATECH-North , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Iwao Nishiyama,et al.  Impact of EUV light scatter on CD control as a result of mask density changes , 2002, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Kenneth A. Goldberg,et al.  Recent results from the Berkeley 0.3-NA EUV microfield exposure tool , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Photon Engineering LLC,et al.  Parametric analysis of the effect of scattered light upon the modulation transfer function , 2013 .

[5]  P. Naulleau,et al.  Extreme-ultraviolet microexposure tool at 0.5 NA for sub-16 nm lithography. , 2008, Optics letters.

[6]  Kenneth A. Goldberg,et al.  EUV microexposures at the ALS using the 0.3-NA MET projection optics , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Guenther Seitz,et al.  Mirror substrates for EUV lithography: progress in metrology and optical fabrication technology , 2000, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[8]  P. Hall Introduction to Surface Roughness and Scattering , 1989 .

[9]  Dominic Ashworth,et al.  Projection optics for extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUVL) micro-field exposure tools (METs) with a numerical aperture of 0.5 , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Dominic Ashworth,et al.  The SEMATECH Berkeley MET: demonstration of 15-nm half-pitch in chemically amplified EUV resist and sensitivity of EUV resists at 6.x-nm , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[11]  G. Moore Cramming more components onto integrated circuits, Reprinted from Electronics, volume 38, number 8, April 19, 1965, pp.114 ff. , 2006, IEEE Solid-State Circuits Newsletter.

[12]  Louis Andrew Marchetti Fabrication and metrology of 10X Schwarschild optics for EUV imaging , 2004, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[13]  Emil C. Piscani,et al.  Demonstration of sub-45-nm features using azimuthal polarization on a 1.30NA immersion microstepper , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[14]  C. Evans,et al.  Test optics error removal. , 1996, Applied optics.

[15]  Steven M. Arnold,et al.  Verification and certification of CGH aspheric nulls , 1995, Optics & Photonics.

[16]  Lisa R. Rich,et al.  Contamination and degradation of 157-nm stepper optical components: field experience at International SEMATECH , 2002, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[17]  K. Freischlad Absolute interferometric testing based on reconstruction of rotational shear. , 2001, Applied optics.

[18]  Dominic Ashworth,et al.  Update on the SEMATECH 0.5 NA Extreme-Ultraviolet Lithography (EUVL) Microfield Exposure Tool (MET) , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[19]  Malcolm C. Gower,et al.  High-resolution EUV microstepper tool for resist testing and technology evaluation , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[20]  Regina Soufli,et al.  Sub-diffraction-limited multilayer coatings for the 0.3 numerical aperture micro-exposure tool for extreme ultraviolet lithography. , 2007, Applied optics.

[21]  M. Chandhok,et al.  Effects of flare in extreme ultraviolet lithography: Learning from the engineering test standa) , 2004 .