Accounting for animal movement in estimation of resource selection functions: sampling and data analysis.

Patterns of resource selection by animal populations emerge as a result of the behavior of many individuals. Statistical models that describe these population-level patterns of habitat use can miss important interactions between individual animals and characteristics of their local environment; however, identifying these interactions is difficult. One approach to this problem is to incorporate models of individual movement into resource selection models. To do this, we propose a model for step selection functions (SSF) that is composed of a resource-independent movement kernel and a resource selection function (RSF). We show that standard case-control logistic regression may be used to fit the SSF; however, the sampling scheme used to generate control points (i.e., the definition of availability) must be accommodated. We used three sampling schemes to analyze simulated movement data and found that ignoring sampling and the resource-independent movement kernel yielded biased estimates of selection. The level of bias depended on the method used to generate control locations, the strength of selection, and the spatial scale of the resource map. Using empirical or parametric methods to sample control locations produced biased estimates under stronger selection; however, we show that the addition of a distance function to the analysis substantially reduced that bias. Assuming a uniform availability within a fixed buffer yielded strongly biased selection estimates that could be corrected by including the distance function but remained inefficient relative to the empirical and parametric sampling methods. As a case study, we used location data collected from elk in Yellowstone National Park, USA, to show that selection and bias may be temporally variable. Because under constant selection the amount of bias depends on the scale at which a resource is distributed in the landscape, we suggest that distance always be included as a covariate in SSF analyses. This approach to modeling resource selection is easily implemented using common statistical tools and promises to provide deeper insight into the movement ecology of animals.

[1]  Paul R Moorcroft,et al.  Mechanistic home range models capture spatial patterns and dynamics of coyote territories in Yellowstone , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  Assessing habitat selection when availability changes , 1996 .

[3]  Joshua J. Millspaugh,et al.  THE APPLICATION OF DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS TO WILDLIFE RESOURCE SELECTION STUDIES , 1999 .

[4]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Resource Selection Functions Based on Use–Availability Data: Theoretical Motivation and Evaluation Methods , 2006 .

[5]  D. Despain.  Yellowstone Vegetation: Consequences of Environment and History in a Natural Setting , 1990 .

[6]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[7]  S. Cherry,et al.  USE AND INTERPRETATION OF LOGISTIC REGRESSION IN HABITAT-SELECTION STUDIES , 2004 .

[8]  DANA L. THOMAS,et al.  Study Designs and Tests for Comparing Resource Use and Availability II , 2006 .

[9]  B. Manly,et al.  Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. , 1994 .

[10]  Vilis O. Nams,et al.  Effects of radiotelemetry error on sample size and bias when testing for habitat selection , 1989 .

[11]  Roger Woodard,et al.  Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging , 1999, Technometrics.

[12]  John G. Cook,et al.  NUTRITIONAL CONDITION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK , 2004 .

[13]  John W. Kern,et al.  DAILY AND SEASONAL MOVEMENTS AND HABITAT USE BY FEMALE ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK AND MULE DEER , 2003 .

[14]  Dean P. Anderson,et al.  State-space models link elk movement patterns to landscape characteristics in Yellowstone National Park , 2007 .

[15]  Stanley Lemeshow,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression, Second Edition , 1989 .

[16]  Ronald A. Green,et al.  Seasonal cycles and daily activity patterns of Rocky Mountain elk , 1990 .

[17]  Dag Ø. Hjermann,et al.  Analyzing habitat selection in animals without well-defined home ranges , 2000 .

[18]  M. Boyce,et al.  WOLVES INFLUENCE ELK MOVEMENTS: BEHAVIOR SHAPES A TROPHIC CASCADE IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK , 2005 .

[19]  Joshua J. Millspaugh,et al.  Radio Tracking and Animal Populations , 2001 .

[20]  Paul R Moorcroft,et al.  Mechanistic home range models and resource selection analysis: a reconciliation and unification. , 2006, Ecology.

[21]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  A SPATIALLY EXPLICIT HABITAT SELECTION MODEL INCORPORATING HOME RANGE BEHAVIOR , 2005 .

[22]  Radu V. Craiu,et al.  Inference Methods for the Conditional Logistic Regression Model with Longitudinal Data , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[23]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Removing GPS collar bias in habitat selection studies , 2004 .

[24]  Frank E. Harrell,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2001 .

[25]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Scale and heterogeneity in habitat selection by elk in Yellowstone National Park , 2003 .

[26]  Corey J A Bradshaw,et al.  Measurement error causes scale-dependent threshold erosion of biological signals in animal movement data. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[27]  M. DALE STRICKLAND,et al.  Introduction to the Special Section on Resource Selection , 2006 .