ChronoTape: tangible timelines for family history

An explosion in the availability of online records has led to surging interest in genealogy. In this paper we explore the present state of genealogical practice, with a particular focus on how the process of research is recorded and later accessed by other researchers. We then present our response, ChronoTape, a novel tangible interface for supporting family history research. The ChronoTape is an example of a temporal tangible interface, an interface designed to enable the tangible representation and control of time. We use the ChronoTape to interrogate the value relationships between physical and digital materials, personal and professional practices, and the ways that records are produced, maintained and ultimately inherited. In contrast to designs that support existing genealogical practice, ChronoTape captures and embeds traces of the researcher within the document of their own research, in three ways: (i) it ensures physical traces of digital research; (ii) it generates personal material around the use of impersonal genealogical data; (iii) it allows for graceful degradation of both its physical and digital components in order to deliberately accommodate the passage of information into the future.

[1]  Kenneth P. Fishkin,et al.  A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[2]  Richard Banks,et al.  The Future of Looking Back (Microsoft Research) , 2011 .

[3]  Steve Benford,et al.  The augurscope: a mixed reality interface for outdoors , 2002, CHI.

[4]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Designing interactive paper: lessons from three augmented reality projects , 1998 .

[5]  Anne Boddington,et al.  PATINA: Personal Architectonics of INteractions with Artefacts , 2010 .

[6]  Peter D. Bennett The representation and control of time in tangible user interfaces: (summary of PhD research) , 2010, TEI '10.

[7]  Brygg Ullmer,et al.  Tangible interfaces for manipulating aggregates of digital information , 2002 .

[8]  David S. Kirk,et al.  On Human Remains: Excavating the Home Archive , 2008 .

[9]  Stacey Pitsillides The future of looking back , 2012 .

[10]  Nikolaus F. Troje,et al.  Paper windows: interaction techniques for digital paper , 2005, CHI.

[11]  Ross Bencina,et al.  reacTIVision: a computer-vision framework for table-based tangible interaction , 2007, TEI.

[12]  Karen Schrier,et al.  Revolutionizing history education : using augmented reality games to teach histories , 2005 .

[13]  Ronald Baecker,et al.  A death in the family: opportunities for designing technologies for the bereaved , 2010, CHI.

[14]  Masatoshi Ishikawa,et al.  Khronos projector , 2005, SIGGRAPH '05.

[15]  Christine Reid,et al.  The Myth of the Paperless Office , 2003, J. Documentation.

[16]  David Kirk On the Design of Technology Heirlooms , 2008 .

[17]  Scott R. Klemmer,et al.  Books with voices: paper transcripts as a physical interface to oral histories , 2003, CHI '03.

[18]  Steffi Beckhaus,et al.  The card box at hand: exploring the potentials of a paper-based tangible interface for education and research in art history , 2007, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[19]  Enrico Costanza,et al.  INTRODUCING AUDIO D-TOUCH: A TANGIBLE USER INTERFACE FOR MUSIC COMPOSITION AND PERFORMANCE , 2003 .

[20]  Eli Blevis,et al.  Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design , 2009, CHI.