Posterior cruciate ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty: a numerical study with a dynamic force controlled knee model

BackgroundAdequate soft tissue balancing is a key factor for a successful result after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is the primary restraint to posterior translation of the tibia after cruciate retaining TKA and is also responsible for the amount of joint compression. However, it is complex to quantify the amount of ligament release with its effects on load bearing and kinematics in TKA and limited both in vivo and in vitro. The goal of this study was to create a dynamic and deformable finite element model of a full leg and analyze a stepwise release of the PCL regarding knee kinematics, pressure distribution and ligament stresses.MethodsA dynamic finite element model was developed in Ansys V14.0 based on boundary conditions of an existing knee rig. A cruciate retraining knee prosthesis was virtually implanted. Ligament and muscle structures were simulated with modified spring elements. Linear elastic materials were defined for femoral component, inlay and patella cartilage. A restart algorithm was developed and implemented into the finite element simulation to hold the ground reaction force constant by adapting quadriceps force. After simulating the unreleased PCL model, two models were developed and calculated with the same boundary conditions with a 50% and 75% release of the PCL stiffness.ResultsFrom the beginning of the simulation to approximately 35° of flexion, tibia moves posterior related to the femur and with higher flexion anteriorly. Anterior translation of the tibia ranged from 5.8 mm for unreleased PCL to 3.7 mm for 75% PCL release (4.9 mm 50% release).A decrease of maximum von Mises equivalent stress on the inlay was given with PCL release, especially in higher flexion angles from 11.1 MPa for unreleased PCL to 8.9 MPa for 50% release of the PCL and 7.8 MPa for 75% release.ConclusionsOur study showed that dynamic FEM is an effective method for simulation of PCL balancing in knee arthroplasty. A tight PCL led in silico to more anterior tibia translation, a higher collateral ligament and inlay stress, while retropatellar pressure remained unchanged. Surgeons may take these results in vivo into account.

[1]  A. P. Serro,et al.  Friction and wear mechanisms in hip prosthesis: Comparison of joint materials behaviour in several lubricants , 2006 .

[2]  F. Noyes,et al.  Ligamentous restraints to anterior-posterior drawer in the human knee. A biomechanical study. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  T. Gill,et al.  Biomechanical consequences of PCL deficiency in the knee under simulated muscle loads—an in vitro experimental study , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  Lars Engebretsen,et al.  The anatomy of the medial part of the knee. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  Clare K Fitzpatrick,et al.  Dynamic finite element knee simulation for evaluation of knee replacement mechanics. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  C. Kaddick,et al.  Effect of anterior-posterior and internal-external motion restraint during knee wear simulation on a posterior stabilised knee design. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  A. Amis,et al.  Loading of the two bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament: an analysis of bundle function in a-P drawer. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  David R Wilson,et al.  Evaluation of a computational model used to predict the patellofemoral contact pressure distribution. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Matthias Woiczinski,et al.  Calculation of the elastic properties of prosthetic knee components with an iterative finite element-based modal analysis: quantitative comparison of different measuring techniques , 2013, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[10]  Jason P. Halloran,et al.  Explicit finite element modeling of total knee replacement mechanics. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  N Verdonschot,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Dynamic Finite Element Model of the Prosthetic Knee Joint: Simulation of Joint Laxity and Kinematics , 2005, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[12]  Clare K Fitzpatrick,et al.  The influence of total knee arthroplasty geometry on mid-flexion stability: an experimental and finite element study. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  C. B. Hovey,et al.  A computer model to simulate patellar biomechanics following total knee replacement: the effects of femoral component alignment. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  G. Smidt,et al.  A quantitative analysis of knee motion during activities of daily living. , 1972, Physical therapy.

[15]  P. Sharkey,et al.  Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  T. McGloughlin,et al.  Wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) in total knee prostheses: A review of key influences , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[17]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Numerical analysis of variations in posterior cruciate ligament properties and balancing techniques on total knee arthroplasty loading. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[18]  Thomas P Andriacchi,et al.  The influence of deceleration forces on ACL strain during single-leg landing: a simulation study. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  L. Blankevoort,et al.  The insertion geometry of the posterolateral corner of the knee. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[20]  A. Amis,et al.  Clinical biomechanics of instability related to total knee arthroplasty. , 2014, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  Miguel Ángel Martínez,et al.  A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the combined behavior of ligaments and menisci in the healthy human knee joint. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  V. Jansson,et al.  Development and validation of a new method for the radiologic measurement of the tibial slope , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[23]  J. Callaghan,et al.  Current Etiologies and Modes of Failure in Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  M Beaugonin,et al.  Simulation of a knee joint replacement during a gait cycle using explicit finite element analysis. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  J Fisher,et al.  Investigation into the effects of proteins and lipids on the frictional properties of articular cartilage. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[26]  Matthias Woiczinski,et al.  Patellofemoral contact patterns before and after total knee arthroplasty: an in vitro measurement , 2013, BioMedical Engineering OnLine.

[27]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  High lubricious surface of cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy prepared by grafting poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine). , 2007, Biomaterials.

[28]  Yoon Hyuk Kim,et al.  Quantification of soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty using finite element analysis , 2014, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[29]  P. Walker,et al.  Preclinical evaluation method for total knees designed to restore normal knee mechanics. , 2011, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[30]  Nikolaus Wülker,et al.  Simulation of force loaded knee movement in a newly developed in vitro knee simulator / Simulation von belastungsabhängigen Kniebewegungen in einem neuartigen Knie-Simulator für In-vitro-Studien , 2009, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[31]  L. Whiteside Soft tissue balancing: the knee. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[32]  P. Sharkey,et al.  Why Are Total Knee Arthroplasties Failing Today? , 2002 .

[33]  M. Ritter,et al.  Posterior cruciate ligament balancing during total knee arthroplasty. , 1988, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[34]  R. Scott,et al.  Balancing the posterior cruciate ligament during cruciate-retaining fixed and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: description of the pull-out lift-off and slide-back tests. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.