Evolutionary implication of protein secondary structure among Archaea and Bacteria

Molecular structures and sequences are generally more revealing of evolutionary relationships than classical phenotypes, particularly among microorganisms. Archaea are unique group of organisms among other kingdoms, which are widely diverged in metabolic pathways and have well distinguished metabolic genes, particularly involved in methanogenesis, osmoregulation, sulfur toxicity, metal detoxification and stress response. Physiochemical characteristics and secondary structure of some superprotein families from archaeal domain were compared within Archaea and with Bacteria. The results of this work revealed that many of the proteins did not show close proximity to bacterial proteins, but few of them showed evolutionary relationship to proteins with similar biochemical functions in Bacteria. Proteins involved in methanogenesis were highly unique to methanogens in archaeal domain, but proteins responsible for carbon assimilation shared their ancestral behaviors among prokaryotes with reference to similarities in secondary structural elements. CO dehydrogenase, 4-vinyl reductase, allophanate reductase, quinine oxidase, dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase and NADH oxidase were somehow similar to prokaryotes which indicated a wide diversification and mobilization of such families between Archaea and Bacteria during evolution process. Another one noteworthy of our study is that a stable divergence and slow evolutionary process were occurred in topoisomerase family of Archaea. Perhaps, this attempt can be helpful to understand evolutionary mechanisms of some key metabolic proteins at secondary structural level in Archaea.

[1]  Robert H. White,et al.  The genome of M. acetivorans reveals extensive metabolic and physiological diversity. , 2002, Genome research.

[2]  James R. Brown,et al.  Archaea and the prokaryote-to-eukaryote transition. , 1997, Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR.

[3]  Z. Yang,et al.  Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  A. Lesk,et al.  The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[5]  R. Doolittle,et al.  Determining Divergence Times of the Major Kingdoms of Living Organisms with a Protein Clock , 1996, Science.

[6]  M. A. Soto,et al.  Conservation of the secondary structure of protein during evolution and the role of the genetic code , 2005, Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere.

[7]  Mark Gerstein,et al.  How far can sequences diverge? , 1997, Nature.

[8]  M Gerstein,et al.  A structural census of genomes: comparing bacterial, eukaryotic, and archaeal genomes in terms of protein structure. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  David C. Jones,et al.  Assessing the impact of secondary structure and solvent accessibility on protein evolution. , 1998, Genetics.

[11]  S. Teichmann,et al.  Domain combinations in archaeal, eubacterial and eukaryotic proteomes. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  A. Cardoso,et al.  Exploring the biotechnologial applications in the archaeal domain , 2007 .

[13]  R D Appel,et al.  Protein identification and analysis tools in the ExPASy server. , 1999, Methods in molecular biology.

[14]  K. Mizuguchi,et al.  Comparison of spatial arrangements of secondary structural elements in proteins. , 1995, Protein engineering.

[15]  W R Taylor,et al.  Deriving an amino acid distance matrix. , 1993, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  Patrick Forterre,et al.  Phylogenomics of type II DNA topoisomerases , 2003, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[17]  Christophe Geourjon,et al.  SOPMA: significant improvements in protein secondary structure prediction by consensus prediction from multiple alignments , 1995, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[18]  Detlef D. Leipe,et al.  Origin and evolution of the archaeo-eukaryotic primase superfamily and related palm-domain proteins: structural insights and new members , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  Oliver Ebenhöh,et al.  A cross species comparison of metabolic network functions. , 2005, Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics.

[20]  Pietro Liò,et al.  PASSML: combining evolutionary inference and protein secondary structure prediction , 1998, Bioinform..

[21]  Darren A. Natale,et al.  The complete genome of hyperthermophile Methanopyrus kandleri AV19 and monophyly of archaeal methanogens , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.