论文信息 - Semantic Heterogeneity in Evidentials

Semantic Heterogeneity in Evidentials

In this paper I will examine some data relating to evidential systems in various languages and existing formal semantic analyses of evidential phenomena, with an eye to determining the extent to which available systems are capable of accounting for the full range of facts. Data will be drawn largely from [1] and from the formal semantic works I'll discuss.

Eric McCready | E. McCready

[1] Jean-Yves Girard,et al. Linear Logic , 1987, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[2] M. Nivat. Fiftieth volume of theoretical computer science , 1988 .

[3] Craige Roberts. Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse , 1989 .

[4] Rob A. van der Sandt,et al. Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution , 1992, J. Semant..

[5] Uwe Reyle,et al. From discourse to logic , 1993 .

[6] Roumyana Izvorski. The Present Perfect as an Epistemic Modal , 1997 .

[7] Martina Faller. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua , 2002 .

[8] Robert Dixon,et al. Studies in evidentiality , 2003 .

[9] Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald. Evidentiality in typological perspective , 2003 .

[10] Alex Lascarides,et al. Indirect Speech Acts , 2001, Synthese.

[11] Christopher Potts. The logic of conventional implicatures , 2004 .

[12] Alex Lascarides,et al. Logics of Conversation , 2005, Studies in natural language processing.

[13] Eric McCready,et al. The dynamics of particles , 2005 .

[14] E. McCready,et al. Modal Subordination in Japanese: Dynamics and Evidentiality , 2006 .

[15] Christopher Potts,et al. The Pragmatic Values of Evidential Sentences , 2007 .

[16] Eric McCready,et al. Evidentiality, modality and probability , 2007 .

[17] Daniel Vanderveken,et al. Meaning and Speech Acts , 2009 .