The Benefit-Transfer Challenges

Presidential Executive Order 12,866 requires federal agencies to design “cost-effective” regulations and to assess “costs and benefits” of these regulations on the basis of “the best reasonably obtainable scientific, technical, economic, and other information.” Benefit transfers are one economic approach used to estimate these benefits and costs, and the use of existing economic information to predict the effects of new policies is well established. However, advancing the practice of benefit transfers is crucial if economists are to play a role in developing federal policies. We review contributions to the benefit-transfer literature and present a unified conceptual framework to guide the design and evaluation of benefit-transfer guidelines.

[1]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Test-Retest Reliability of the Contingent Valuation Method: A Comparison of General Population and Visitor Responses , 1989 .

[2]  H. Spencer Banzhaf,et al.  Meta-analysis in model implementation: choice sets and the valuation of air quality improvements , 2007 .

[3]  V. Smith,et al.  On separating defensible benefit transfers from “smoke and mirrors” , 1992 .

[4]  M. Termansen,et al.  Testing Benefits Transfer of Forest Recreation Values over a Twenty-Year Time Horizon , 2007, Land Economics.

[5]  J. J. Hines.  Three Sides of Harberger Triangles , 1999 .

[6]  James J. Murphy,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation , 2003 .

[7]  Scott E. Atkinson,et al.  Bayesian exchangeability, benefit transfer, and research efficiency , 1992 .

[8]  Bonnie G. Colby,et al.  Evaluating the Performance of Benefit Transfer: An Empirical Inquiry , 1997 .

[9]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  Contingent Valuation in Practice , 2003 .

[10]  Teofilo Ozuna,et al.  Testing the Reliability of the Benefit Function Transfer Approach , 1996 .

[11]  S. Colombo,et al.  Testing choice experiment for benefit transfer , 2005 .

[12]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  Benefit transfer studies: Myths, pragmatism, and idealism , 1992 .

[13]  I. Bateman.  Economic valuation with stated preference techniques : a manual : department for transport , 2002 .

[14]  A. Troy,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer , 2006 .

[15]  George Van Houtven,et al.  Benefit Transfer via Preference Calibration: “Prudential Algebra” for Policy , 2002, Land Economics.

[16]  Jo Ann Howard.  Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review , 1999 .

[17]  Ståle Navrud,et al.  Environmental value transfer : issues and methods , 2007 .

[18]  Kenneth E. McConnell,et al.  Model building and judgment: Implications for benefit transfers with travel cost models , 1992 .

[19]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Contrasting conventional with multi-level modelling approaches to meta-analysis: expectation consistency in UK woodland recreation values. , 2003 .

[20]  Riccardo Scarpa,et al.  Improving multi-site benefit functions via Bayesian model averaging: A new approach to benefit transfer , 2008 .

[21]  Nicolai V. Kuminoff,et al.  Decomposing the structural identification of non-market values , 2009 .

[22]  J. Hausman.  Exact Consumer's Surplus and Deadweight Loss , 1981 .

[23]  D. Kristófersson,et al.  Validity Tests of Benefit Transfer – Are We Performing the Wrong Tests? , 2005 .

[24]  Matthew A. Wilson,et al.  Valuing environmental goods and services using benefit transfer: The state-of-the art and science , 2006 .

[25]  Mary Jo Kealy,et al.  Benefits Transfer in a Random Utility Model of Recreation , 1994 .

[26]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Reliability and Validity Assessment , 1979 .

[27]  Bill Provencher,et al.  Does accounting for preference heterogeneity improve the forecasting of a random utility model? A case study , 2004 .

[28]  Laura O. Taylor,et al.  What Determines the Value of Life: A Meta‐Analysis , 2002 .

[29]  Roy Brouwer,et al.  Environmental value transfer: state of the art and future prospects , 2000 .

[30]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Testing a meta-analysis model for benefit transfer in international outdoor recreation , 2001 .

[31]  Robert J. Johnston,et al.  Choice experiments, site similarity and benefits transfer , 2007 .

[32]  G. Parsons.  The Travel Cost Model , 2003 .

[33]  David Neumark,et al.  Wheat from Chaff: Meta-Analysis as Quantitative Literature Review: Reply , 2002 .

[34]  R. Martínez-Espiñeira,et al.  ‘Been There Done That’: Disentangling Option Value Effects from User Heterogeneity When Valuing Natural Resources with a Use Component , 2012, Environmental Management.

[35]  Raj Chetty,et al.  Salience and taxation: theory and evidence , 2008 .

[36]  M. Teisl,et al.  Test-Retest Reliability of Contingent Valuation with Independent Sample Pretest and Posttest Control Groups , 1995 .

[37]  Thilo Muthke,et al.  National and International Benefit Transfer Testing with a Rigorous Test Procedure , 2004 .

[38]  F. Reed Johnson,et al.  Benefits and costs of pulp and paper effluent controls under the Clean Water Act , 1992 .

[39]  Russell Blamey,et al.  Choice Modeling and Tests of Benefit Transfer , 2002 .

[40]  T. Hoban,et al.  Testing for Temporal Reliability in Contingent Valuation with Time for Changes in Factors Affecting Demand , 1999 .

[41]  H. Banzhaf,et al.  Do People Vote with Their Feet? An Empirical Test of Tiebout's Mechanism , 2008 .

[42]  George R. Parsons,et al.  Benefits transfer: conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies , 1992 .

[43]  Lucas W. Davis.  The Effect of Health Risk on Housing Values: Evidence from a Cancer Cluster. , 2004, The American economic review.

[44]  Henrik Lindhjem,et al.  How Reliable are Meta-Analyses for International Benefit Transfers? , 2007 .

[45]  Dominic Moran,et al.  Spatial economic valuation : Benefits transfer using geographical information systems , 1996 .

[46]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method , 1987 .

[47]  Koleman Strumpf,et al.  Assessing the Importance of Tiebout Sorting: Local Heterogeneity from 1850 to 1990 , 2003 .

[48]  Robert J. Johnston,et al.  Systematic Variation in Willingness to Pay for Aquatic Resource Improvements and Implications for Benefit Transfer: A Meta-Analysis , 2005 .

[49]  Philippe Thalmann,et al.  Hedonic Methods in Housing Markets , 2008 .

[50]  Nick Hanley,et al.  Testing Choice Experiment for Benefit Transfer with Preference Heterogeneity , 2007 .

[51]  Laura O. Taylor.  The Hedonic Method , 2003 .

[52]  Thomas C. Brown,et al.  A primer on nonmarket valuation , 2003 .

[53]  John Rolfe,et al.  Choice Modelling and the Transfer of Environmental Values , 2006 .

[54]  J. Bennett,et al.  Introduction [to The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation] , 2001 .

[55]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Temporal Reliability of Estimates from Contingent Valuation , 1997 .

[56]  John B. Loomis,et al.  The Evolution of a More Rigorous Approach to Benefit Transfer: Benefit Function Transfer , 1992 .

[57]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  Assessing the Accuracy of Benefits Transfers: Evidence from a Multi-State Contigent Valuation Study of Groundwater Quality , 1995 .

[58]  Roy Brouwer,et al.  The Validity of Environmental Benefits Transfer: Further Empirical Testing , 1999 .

[59]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Is Meta-Analysis a Noah's Ark for Non-Market Valuation? , 2002 .

[60]  Randall S. Rosenberger,et al.  Selection Effects in Meta-Analysis and Benefit Transfer: Avoiding Unintended Consequences , 2009, Land Economics.

[61]  Richard G. Walsh,et al.  Benefit transfer of outdoor recreation demand studies, 1968–1988 , 1992 .

[62]  Martin Whitby,et al.  Valuing environmental goods in the countryside. , 1996 .

[63]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  Necessary Conditions for Valid Benefit Transfers , 2009 .

[64]  Klaus Moeltner,et al.  Meta-analysis and benefit transfer for resource valuation-addressing classical challenges with Bayesian modeling , 2007 .

[65]  C. Manski.  Nonparametric Bounds on Treatment Effects , 1989 .

[66]  V. Kerry Smith,et al.  Signals or Noise? Explaining the Variation in Recreation Benefit Estimates , 1990 .

[67]  A. Vatn,et al.  Transferring environmental value estimates: Issues and alternatives , 2006 .

[68]  Stephen J. Peters,et al.  Economic Report of the President Data Analysis Model. , 1995 .

[69]  George Van Houtven,et al.  Structural benefit transfer: An example using VSL estimates , 2006 .

[70]  Steven Berry,et al.  The Pure Characteristics Demand Model , 2007 .

[71]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Endangered Species and Uncertainty: The Economics of a Safe Minimum Standard , 1978 .

[72]  Arnold C. Harberger.  Three Basic Postulates for Applied Welfare Economics: An Interpretive Essay , 1971 .

[73]  Robert J. Johnston,et al.  Meta-Analysis, Benefit Transfer, and Methodological Covariates: Implications for Transfer Error , 2009 .

[74]  Peter E. Kennedy,et al.  The Use (and Abuse) of Meta-analysis in Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: an Assessment , 2022 .

[75]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Using meta‐analysis for benefit transfer: In‐sample convergent validity tests of an outdoor recreation database , 2000 .

[76]  Thomas P. Holmes,et al.  Attribute-Based Methods , 2003 .