Interobserver agreement for sonograms of breast lesions obtained by an automated breast volume scanner.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the interobserver agreement of radiologists in the description and final assessment of breast sonograms obtained using an automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) using a unique descriptor of three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US) and the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) US lexicon. METHODS From October to December 2010, 208 patients were subjected to an ABVS examination in the supine position, and data were automatically sent to the ABVS workstation. Two radiologists independently evaluated 234 breast masses (148 benign and 86 malignant masses) using a unique descriptor from the 3D US and the BI-RADS US lexicon. The reviewers were blinded to the patient's mammographic images, medical history, and pathologic findings. The interobserver agreement was measured using kappa statistics. RESULTS Substantial agreement was obtained for lesion shape, orientation, margin, echo pattern, posterior acoustic features, calcification and final assessment (κ=0.79, 0.74, 0.76, 0.69, 0.68, 0.71 and 0.70, respectively). Fair agreement was obtained for retraction phenomenon and lesion boundary (κ=0.54 and 0.42, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The interobserver agreement for breast sonograms obtained by ABVS is good, especially for lesion shape and margin; however, the interobserver agreement for the retraction phenomenon, which is a unique descriptor of coronal-plane 3D US, needs to be improved.

[1]  Ki Keun Oh,et al.  Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[2]  M. Mainiero,et al.  BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. , 2006, Radiology.

[3]  Sung Hun Kim,et al.  Observer Agreement Using the ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-Ultrasound, First Edition (2003) , 2007, Korean journal of radiology.

[4]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Radiologists' performance in the detection of benign and malignant masses with 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS). , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[5]  M Reiser,et al.  Analysis of 107 breast lesions with automated 3D ultrasound and comparison with mammography and manual ultrasound. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[6]  N. Papantoniou,et al.  The Contribution of Three-Dimensional Power Doppler Imaging in the Preoperative Assessment of Breast Tumors: A Preliminary Report , 2009, Obstetrics and gynecology international.

[7]  Etta D Pisano,et al.  A comparative study of 2D and 3D ultrasonography for evaluation of solid breast masses. , 2005, European journal of radiology.

[8]  Xi Lin,et al.  Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[9]  Ellen Kao,et al.  Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses. , 2009, Radiology.

[10]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.