Hydrodynamics of model Posidonia oceanica patches in shallow water

The hydrodynamics of simulated patches of the Mediterranean seagrass Posidonia oceanica were studied in laboratory flume experiments in which the height of the pronated canopy was always greater than half the total water depth. The effects of variations in speed (from 0.08 m s 21 to 0.24 m s 21 ) and patch configuration on the hydrodynamics were investigated. Significant speeds penetrated the patches to approximately half their height. Reducing speed did not change the flow patterns observed, except to weaken and blur them. Flow encountering a single patch formed a turbulent wake at the height of the top of the canopy. Within this wake, the vertical shear stress decreased monotonically downstream, but the Reynolds stress increased initially and then decayed. When a second patch was positioned within the region where Reynolds stress increased (referred to as the ‘‘06 patch’’), the wake center penetrated it, causing average turbulent velocities with horizontal components 3.3 times higher and vertical components 4.2 times higher than in the upstream patch. When this patch was positioned where the Reynolds stress decayed (referred to as the ‘‘14 patch’’), the wake center rose above it. Nevertheless, the turbulence in the 14 patch had horizontal components 12% higher and vertical components 22% higher on average than in the 06 patch because its upstream end was closer to the Reynolds stress maximum. Thus the ratio of the patch separation to the length of wake in which the Reynolds stress increased was identified as central to quantifying the turbulence within the downstream patch. The increased turbulence is likely to be important in determining sedimentary and ecological patch characteristics by increasing retention of particulates in suspension and thus reducing depositional rates of, for example, larvae, nutrients, and dead organic matter.

[1]  C. Duarte,et al.  Flow and Particle Distributions in a Nearshore Seagrass Meadow before and after a Storm , 2001 .

[2]  C. Dawes,et al.  Effects of Community Structure on the Seagrass Thalassia testudinum , 1999 .

[3]  H. Nepf,et al.  Mixing layers and coherent structures in vegetated aquatic flows , 2002 .

[4]  W. Dennison,et al.  Role of daily light period in the depth distribution of Zostera marina (eelgrass) , 1985 .

[5]  Christopher D. Cornelisen,et al.  Ammonium and nitrate uptake by leaves of the seagrass Thalassia testudinum: impact of hydrodynamic regime and epiphyte cover on uptake rates , 2004 .

[6]  M. Abdelrhman Effect of eelgrass Zostera marina canopies on flow and transport , 2003 .

[7]  J. A. Sullivan,et al.  A model for diffusion within emergent vegetation , 1997 .

[8]  R. Orth,et al.  Biomechanical properties of the reproductive shoots of eelgrass , 2001 .

[9]  P. Chambers,et al.  The interaction between water movement, sediment dynamics and submersed macrophytes , 2001, Hydrobiologia.

[10]  W. Judson Kenworthy,et al.  Effects of current on photosynthesis and distribution of seagrasses , 1987 .

[11]  Frederick T. Short,et al.  Natural and human-induced disturbance of seagrasses , 1996, Environmental Conservation.

[12]  C. Duarte,et al.  AN APPROACH TO MEASUREMENT OF PARTICLE FLUX AND SEDIMENT RETENTION WITHIN SEAGRASS (POSIDONIA OCEANICA) MEADOWS , 1999 .

[13]  Randall S. Alberte,et al.  Flow, flapping, and photosynthesis ofNereocystis leutkeana: a functional comparison of undulate and flat blade morphologies , 1988 .

[14]  E. Irlandi Seagrass patch size and survivorship of an infaunal bivalve , 1997 .

[15]  J. Tanner Patch shape and orientation influences on seagrass epifauna are mediated by dispersal abilities , 2003 .

[16]  Kevin A. Hovel Habitat fragmentation in marine landscapes: relative effects of habitat cover and configuration on juvenile crab survival in California and North Carolina seagrass beds , 2003 .

[17]  J. Fisher,et al.  Influence of the seagrass, Zostera marina L., on current flow☆ , 1982 .

[18]  Enrique R. Vivoni,et al.  Flow structure in depth-limited, vegetated flow , 2000 .

[19]  Norman W. Scheffner,et al.  Hydrodynamic and sediment transport modeling with emphasis on shallow-water, vegetated areas (lakes, reservoirs, estuaries and lagoons) , 2001, Hydrobiologia.

[20]  Javier Romero,et al.  Dynamics of Millenary Organic Deposits Resulting from the Growth of the Mediterranean Seagrass Posidonia oceanica , 1997 .

[21]  J. Fisher,et al.  The role of current velocity in structuring eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) meadows , 1983 .

[22]  K. Heck,et al.  Impact of habitat edges on density and secondary production of seagrass-associated fauna , 2002 .

[23]  MC Gambi,et al.  Flume observations on flow dynamics in Zostera marina (eelgrass) beds , 1990 .

[24]  J. C. Kaimal,et al.  Atmospheric boundary layer flows , 1994 .

[25]  S. Bell,et al.  Influence of physical setting on seagrass landscapes near Beaufort, North Carolina, USA , 1998 .

[26]  N. Marbà,et al.  Sediment deposition and production in SE-Asia seagrass meadows , 2003 .

[27]  A. Ōkubo,et al.  Reduced mixing in a marine macrophyte canopy , 1993 .

[28]  J. Fisher,et al.  A comparison of canopy friction and sediment movement between four species of seagrass with reference to their ecology and restoration , 1986 .

[29]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  Three-dimensional measurement of river channel flow processes using acoustic doppler velocimetry , 1998 .

[30]  E. Irlandi,et al.  Influence of seagrass habitat patch size on growth and survival of juvenile bay scallops, Argopecten irradians concentricus (Say) , 1999 .

[31]  Ryan J. Lowe,et al.  Hydrodynamics of larval settlement: The influence of turbulent stress events at potential recruitment sites , 2002 .