Effect of ground motion filtering on the dynamic response of a seismically isolated bridge with and without fault crossing considerations

Abstract High-pass filtering not only removes the low-frequency noise from the near-fault ground motion records, but also eliminates the permanent ground displacement and reduces the dynamic ground displacement. This may considerably influence the calculated seismic response of a spatially extended engineering structure crossing a fault rupture zone. To demonstrate the importance of incorporating permanent ground displacements in the analysis and design of extended structures under specific fault crossing conditions, the dynamic response of a seismically isolated bridge located in the vicinity of a surface fault rupture (“Case A”) or crossing a fault rupture zone (“Case B”) is calculated by utilizing a near-fault ground motion record processed with and without a displacement offset. The seismically isolated bridge considered in this study is a 10-span continuous structure supported by 11 piers, resembling a typical segment of the 2.3 km long Bolu Viaduct 1 located in west-central Turkey. The Lucerne Valley record from the 1992 M w 7.2 Landers earthquake, which preserves a permanent ground displacement in the fault-parallel direction and exhibits a large velocity pulse in the fault-normal direction, is used as the basis for investigating the effect of high-pass filtering on the dynamic response of the bridge. For the seismically isolated bridge located in the vicinity of the surface fault rupture (“Case A”), the utilization of the high-pass filtered ground motion leads to underestimating the demands of pier top, pier bottom and deck displacements. However, the demands of isolation displacement, isolation permanent displacement and pier drift are almost identical for both the unfiltered and filtered versions of the ground motion record. On the other hand, for the seismically isolated bridge traversed by a fault rupture zone (“Case B”), all response quantities are significantly underestimated when the high-pass filtered ground motion is used. These results, though limited to a single bridge structure and a single ground motion input, clearly indicate the importance of permanent ground displacement on the dynamic response of spatially extended engineering structures crossing fault rupture zones.

[1]  D. Wald,et al.  Spatial and temporal distribution of slip for the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[2]  George P. Mavroeidis,et al.  A Mathematical Representation of Near-Fault Ground Motions , 2003 .

[3]  Rongjiang Wang,et al.  An Improved Automatic Scheme for Empirical Baseline Correction of Digital Strong-Motion Records , 2011 .

[4]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  A note on the useable dynamic range of accelerographs recording translation 1 We dedicate this paper , 2001 .

[5]  D. Boore Effect of Baseline Corrections on Displacements and Response Spectra for Several Recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake , 2004 .

[6]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Zero baseline correction of strong-motion accelerograms , 1971, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[7]  David M. Boore Analog-to-Digital Conversion as a Source of Drifts in Displacements Derived from Digital Recordings of Ground Acceleration , 2003 .

[8]  D. Boore,et al.  On Baseline Corrections and Uncertainty in Response Spectrafor Baseline Variations Commonly Encounteredin Digital Accelerograph Records , 2009 .

[9]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Real-Time Strong-Motion Broadband Displacements from Collocated GPS and Accelerometers , 2011 .

[10]  V. W. Lee,et al.  A note on the accuracy of computed ground displacements from strong-motion accelerograms , 1974, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[11]  Vladimir Graizer,et al.  Strong Motion Recordings and Residual Displacements: What Are We Actually Recording in Strong Motion Seismology? , 2010 .

[12]  Norman A. Abrahamson,et al.  Are Near-Fault Fling Effects Captured in the New NGA West2 Ground Motion Models? , 2015 .

[13]  Maria I. Todorovska Cross‐axis sensitivity of accelerographs with pendulum like transducers—mathematical model and the inverse problem , 1998 .

[14]  Babak Alavi,et al.  Behavior of moment‐resisting frame structures subjected to near‐fault ground motions , 2004 .

[15]  Yih‐Min Wu,et al.  Approximate recovery of coseismic deformation from Taiwan strong-motion records , 2007 .

[16]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  EFFECTS OF CROSS-AXIS SENSITIVITY AND MISALIGNMENT ON THE RESPONSE OF MECHANICAL-OPTICAL ACCELEROGRAPHS , 1977 .

[17]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  FLING IN NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTIONS AND ITS EFFECT ON STRUCTURAL COLLAPSE CAPACITY , 2014 .

[18]  Kristine M. Larson,et al.  Recovering Seismic Displacements through Combined Use of 1-Hz GPS and Strong-Motion Accelerometers , 2007 .

[19]  Chia-Yen Peng,et al.  Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , 2005 .

[20]  J. Douglas,et al.  High-frequency filtering of strong-motion records , 2011 .

[21]  A. Papageorgiou,et al.  Near‐fault ground motions, and the response of elastic and inelastic single‐degree‐of‐freedom (SDOF) systems , 2004 .

[22]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  On robust and reliable automated baseline corrections for strong motion seismology , 2013 .

[23]  N. Alexander,et al.  Concerning Baseline Errors in the Form of Acceleration Transients When Recovering Displacements from Strong Motion Records Using the Undecimated Wavelet Transform , 2013 .

[24]  Alper Ucak,et al.  Behavior of a seismically isolated bridge crossing a fault rupture zone , 2014 .

[25]  Yih‐Min Wu,et al.  An automatic scheme for baseline correction of strong-motion records in coseismic deformation determination , 2008 .

[26]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences , 2005 .

[27]  David M. Boore,et al.  Comments on Baseline Correction of Digital Strong-Motion Data: Examples from the 1999 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake , 2002 .

[28]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Effects of Fling Step and Forward Directivity on Seismic Response of Buildings , 2006 .

[29]  S. Larsen,et al.  Near-Field Across-Fault Seismic Ground Motions , 2011 .

[30]  Hugh Bradner,et al.  Some methods for determining acceleration and tilt by use of pendulums and accelerometers , 1973, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[31]  Hung-Chie Chiu,et al.  Stable baseline correction of digital strong-motion data , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[32]  Vladimir Graizer,et al.  Effect of tilt on strong motion data processing , 2005 .