An integrated fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making model for employees' performance appraisal

Evaluating and ranking the employees working in organisations are challenging tasks involving several factors. Each employee achieves certain skill levels in various factors and the resulting information can be overwhelming. This article demonstrates how an integrated tool like fuzzy multi-attribute decision making (FMADM), with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), fuzzy quality function deployment (FQFD), is applied as a fair evaluating and sorting tool to support the performance appraisal (PA) system. The fuzzy linguistic approach has the advantage of reducing distortion and losing of information. FMADM focuses on the best practices of employees for the purpose of improving overall performance. Unlike traditional PAs, FMADM searches for the highly skilled employees who will serve as peers. The FMADM process identifies employees who require improvements in certain factor(s), and the magnitude of improvements required. This study supports the ideas that rating formats need re-examination as an alternative to traditional rating methods. Earlier adopted methods have seldom identified and quantified the individual factors for improvement, whereas FMADM could overcome these shortfalls. Based on the results of FMADM, the improvement of employees' performance is possible by way of providing training, talent enhancement and further qualification wherever required.

[1]  W. A. Tiao,et al.  House of quality: A fuzzy logic-based requirements analysis , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  David A. DeCenzo,et al.  Personnel/Human Resource Management , 1988 .

[3]  Yildiz Esra Albayrak,et al.  Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to improve human performance: An application of multiple criteria decision making problem , 2004, J. Intell. Manuf..

[4]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Selecting IS personnel use fuzzy GDSS based on metric distance method , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Do managers see themselves as other see them? Implications of self-other rating agreement for human resources management , 1997 .

[6]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[7]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  Potential applications of fuzzy sets in industrial safety engineering , 1986 .

[8]  Kwang-Jae Kim,et al.  Determination of an Optimal Set of Design Requirements Using House of Quality , 1998 .

[9]  D. Teodorovic Fuzzy sets theory applications in traffic and transportation , 1994 .

[10]  Richard Y. K. Fung,et al.  A new approach to quality function deployment planning with financial consideration , 2002, Comput. Oper. Res..

[11]  Chris J. Backhouse,et al.  Linking employee behaviour to external customer satisfaction using quality function deployment , 2004 .

[12]  Robert L. Cardy,et al.  Human resource management in a total quality organizational environment: Shifting from a traditional to a TQHRM approach , 1996 .

[13]  H. Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications , 1993 .

[14]  Alan Jessop,et al.  Minimally biased weight determination in personnel selection , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Craig Eric Schneier,et al.  Creating a Performance Management System. , 1986 .

[16]  Jiunn-I Shieh,et al.  Integration of environmental considerations in quality function deployment by using fuzzy logic , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Dr. Hans Hellendoorn,et al.  An Introduction to Fuzzy Control , 1996, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[18]  P. Drucker,et al.  管理的实践=The practice of management , 1954 .

[19]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[20]  David A. Waldman,et al.  THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT TO A THEORY OF WORK PERFORMANCE , 1994 .

[21]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Employee responses to formal performance appraisal feedback , 1986 .

[22]  Robert C. Woods,et al.  Managing to Meet Employee Expectations: Quality Improvement Tools Narrow the Gap between Employee Expectations and Company Resources , 1993 .

[23]  Michael A. Novak,et al.  Advances in physician profiling: the use of DEA , 2003 .

[24]  Petri Mähönen,et al.  Fuzzy Classifier for Star-Galaxy Separation , 2000 .

[25]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy sets, uncertainty and information , 1988 .

[26]  P. Baker,et al.  The Handbook of Logistics and Distribution Management , 2001 .

[27]  J. Ghorpade,et al.  Creating quality-driven performance appraisal systems , 1995 .

[28]  Abraham Kandel,et al.  Fuzzy Logic Applications in Transportation Systems , 1995, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[29]  Louis Cohen,et al.  Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You , 1995 .

[30]  Amy J. C. Trappey,et al.  A computerized quality function deployment approach for retail services , 1996 .

[31]  Stéphane Brutus,et al.  Multisource assessment programs in organizations: An insider's perspective , 2002 .

[32]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Fuzzy multicriteria analysis for performance evaluation of bus companies , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Peter R. Scholtes,et al.  Total quality or performance appraisal: Choose one , 1993 .

[34]  Georgia Alexouda,et al.  A user-friendly marketing decision support system for the product line design using evolutionary algorithms , 2005, Decis. Support Syst..

[35]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  Employee Performance Appraisal Using Data Envelopment Analysis: A Case Study , 2009 .

[36]  Terry Williams,et al.  A TQM Approach to HR Performance Evaulation: A Questionnaire Survey , 2003 .

[37]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  A procedure for ordering fuzzy subsets of the unit interval , 1981, Inf. Sci..

[38]  T. Pavlidis,et al.  Fuzzy sets and their applications to cognitive and decision processes , 1977 .

[39]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  Guido Capaldo,et al.  Applying fuzzy logic to personnel assessment : a case study , 2001 .

[41]  T. Grubb Performance Appraisal Reappraised: It’s Not All Positive , 2007 .

[42]  James L. Bossert,et al.  Quality Function Deployment , 2021, Quality Function Deployment.

[43]  George M. Alliger,et al.  Fuzzy sets and personnel selection: discussion and an application , 1993 .

[44]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Fuzzy sets and operations research: Perspectives , 1997, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[45]  J. Hauser,et al.  The House of Quality , 1988 .

[46]  Joseph Moses Juran Juran on leadership for quality : an executive handbook , 1989 .

[47]  Eleonora Bottani,et al.  Strategic management of logistics service: A fuzzy QFD approach , 2006 .

[48]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  Personnel Selection Using a Fuzzy MCDM Approach Based on Ideal and Anti-ideal Solutions , 2001 .

[49]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Fuzzy sets-a convenient fiction for modeling vagueness and possibility , 1994, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[50]  Shanan G. Gibson,et al.  Holistic versus decomposed ratings of general dimensions of work activity , 2007 .

[51]  Ludmil Mikhailov,et al.  Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2004, Appl. Soft Comput..

[52]  Saadettin Erhan Kesen,et al.  A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem , 2009, Appl. Soft Comput..

[53]  Terry Williams,et al.  A TQM Approach to HR Performance Evaluation Criteria , 2003 .

[54]  Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al.  An application of quality function deployment to industrial training courses , 1998 .

[55]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory - and Its Applications , 1985 .

[56]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Decision support for bus operations under uncertainty: a fuzzy expert system approach , 1998 .

[57]  Adem Göleç,et al.  A fuzzy model for competency-based employee evaluation and selection , 2007, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[58]  K. Ishikawa What is total quality control the japanese way , 2002 .