Temperature as a factor affecting transmembrane water flux in forward osmosis: Steady-state modeling and experimental validation

Abstract Forward osmosis (FO) represents a new membrane-based technology to desalinate seawater driven by osmotic pressure of solution spontaneously. Temperature is closely correlated to the solution physicochemical properties, and thus has a remarkable impact to transmembrane water flux of FO process. The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the dependence of FO performance on temperature. The water flux was predicted using steady-state models that incorporate temperature effect on osmotic pressure, hydrodynamics of boundary layer, transmembrane mass and heat flux processes. The experiments were performed in a FO module with sodium chloride serving as feed and draw solution. The results demonstrated a substantial positive correlation between water flux and bulk solution temperature in the range of 20–40 °C. As indicated by both theoretical prediction and experimental validation, the improvement of mass diffusion kinetics, rather than solution osmotic pressure, dominated the FO performance in terms of water transmembrane flux when temperature was increased. This should be preliminarily a result of decrease in solution viscosity, which was consistent with the decrease in polarization resistances of boundary layer, supporting layer as well as active layer. With the increased flow rate, water flux was increased at all temperatures due to the improvement of mass transfer at boundary layer. The magnitude of heat flux was observed to positively relate to the flow rate and transmembrane temperature difference. Toward more efficient and energy-effective operation, this study not only provides an insight into the effect of temperature on transmembrane water flux, but also suggests a strategic importance of regulating temperature in FO process.

[1]  Tzahi Y. Cath,et al.  Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications , 2010 .

[2]  Meng Wang,et al.  Carbon nanotube: Possible candidate for forward osmosis , 2010 .

[3]  June-Seok Choi,et al.  Toward a combined system of forward osmosis and reverse osmosis for seawater desalination , 2009 .

[4]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics simulations of flow and concentration polarization in forward osmosis membrane systems , 2011 .

[5]  Rong Wang,et al.  Fabrication of novel poly(amide–imide) forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes with a positively charged nanofiltration-like selective layer , 2011 .

[6]  In-Chul Kim,et al.  Nanoporous polyethersulfone (PES) membrane with enhanced flux applied in forward osmosis process , 2011 .

[7]  Rong Wang,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of flat-sheet thin film composite forward osmosis membranes , 2011 .

[8]  How Yong Ng,et al.  Modified models to predict flux behavior in forward osmosis in consideration of external and internal concentration polarizations , 2008 .

[9]  K.S.M.S. Raghavarao,et al.  Concentration and temperature polarization effects during osmotic membrane distillation , 2008 .

[10]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis , 2006 .

[11]  Tai-Shung Chung,et al.  Forward osmosis processes: Yesterday, today and tomorrow , 2012 .

[12]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Modeling double-skinned FO membranes , 2011 .

[13]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis: role of membrane orientation , 2006 .

[14]  Robert L McGinnis,et al.  Desalination by ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis: Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance , 2006 .

[15]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration , 2010 .

[16]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Effect of membrane chemistry and coating layer on physiochemical properties of thin film composite polyamide RO and NF membranes: II. Membrane physiochemical properties and their dependence on polyamide and coating layers , 2009 .

[17]  R. Baker,et al.  Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis , 1981 .

[18]  Andrea Cipollina,et al.  تحلية مياه البحر؛ سيرورات الطاقة التقليدية والمتجددة (Seawater Desalination. Conventional and Renewable Energy Processes) , 2009 .

[19]  Kai Yu Wang,et al.  Study of draw solutes using 2-methylimidazole-based compounds in forward osmosis , 2010 .

[20]  D.J.H. Harmsen,et al.  Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge , 2008 .

[21]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. , 2007, Water research.

[22]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Effect of draw solution concentration and operating conditions on forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis performance in a spiral wound module , 2010 .

[23]  Kai Yu Wang,et al.  Double-Skinned Forward Osmosis Membranes for Reducing Internal Concentration Polarization within the Porous Sublayer , 2010 .

[24]  Kai Yu Wang,et al.  Polybenzimidazole (PBI) nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes applied in forward osmosis process , 2007 .

[25]  H. M. Nguyen,et al.  Characterisation of the polarisations in osmotic distillation of glucose solutions in hollow fibre module , 2005 .

[26]  Qian Yang,et al.  Cellulose acetate nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for forward osmosis processes , 2010 .

[27]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes , 2010 .

[28]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[29]  R. Baker Membrane Technology and Applications , 1999 .

[30]  Sidney L. Phillips,et al.  Thermal conductivity of aqueous sodium chloride solutions from 20 to 330.degree.C , 1980 .

[31]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Study of integration of forward osmosis and biological process: Membrane performance under elevated salt environment , 2011 .

[32]  Qian Yang,et al.  Enhanced forward osmosis from chemically modified polybenzimidazole (PBI) nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes with a thin wall , 2009 .

[33]  F. Chenlo,et al.  Viscosities of aqueous solutions of sucrose and sodium chloride of interest in osmotic dehydration processes , 2002 .

[34]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Relating performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes to support layer formation and , 2011 .