Global analyses of evolutionary dynamics and exhaustive search for social norms that maintain cooperation by reputation.

Reputation formation is a key to understanding indirect reciprocity. In particular, the way to assign reputation to each individual, namely a norm that describes who is good and who is bad, greatly affects the possibility of sustained cooperation in the population. Previously, we have exhaustively studied reputation dynamics that are able to maintain a high level of cooperation at the ESS. However, this analysis examined the stability of monomorphic population and did not investigate polymorphic population where several strategies coexist. Here, we study the evolutionary dynamics of multiple behavioral strategies by replicator dynamics. We exhaustively study all 16 possible norms under which the reputation of a player in the next round is determined by the action of the self and the reputation of the opponent. For each norm, we explore evolutionary dynamics of three strategies: unconditional cooperators, unconditional defectors, and conditional cooperators. We find that only three norms, simple-standing, Kandori, and shunning, can make conditional cooperation evolutionarily stable, hence, realize sustained cooperation. The other 13 norms, including scoring, ultimately lead to the invasion by defectors. Also, we study the model in which private reputation errors exist to a small extent. In this case, we find the stable coexistence of unconditional and conditional cooperators under the three norms.

[1]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring , 1998, Nature.

[2]  M. N,et al.  The Dynamics of Indirect Reciprocity , 1998 .

[3]  Mayuko Nakamaru,et al.  Evolution of rumours that discriminate lying defectors , 2004 .

[4]  P. Richerson,et al.  The evolution of indirect reciprocity , 1989 .

[5]  P. Taylor,et al.  Evolutionarily Stable Strategies and Game Dynamics , 1978 .

[6]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  Eiji Takagi The Generalized Exchange Perspective on the Evolution of Altruism , 1996 .

[8]  V. Braithwaite,et al.  The Long-Term Benefits of Human Generosity in Indirect Reciprocity , 2002, Current Biology.

[9]  Karl Sigmund,et al.  Indirect reciprocity, image scoring, and moral hazard. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Michael A Fishman,et al.  Indirect reciprocity among imperfect individuals. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  The nature of human altruism , 2003, Nature.

[12]  Jochem Marotzke,et al.  Stabilizing the earth's climate is not a losing game: supporting evidence from public goods experiments. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Karl Sigmund,et al.  The logic of reprobation: assessment and action rules for indirect reciprocation. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  M. Milinski,et al.  Cooperation through image scoring in humans. , 2000, Science.

[15]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  How should we define goodness?--reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  E. Fehr Human behaviour: Don't lose your reputation , 2004, Nature.

[17]  Arnon Lotem,et al.  Evolution of cooperation between individuals , 1999, Nature.

[18]  R. Boyd,et al.  Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem , 2004, Nature.

[19]  Michihiro Kandori Social Norms and Community Enforcement , 1992 .

[20]  Karthik Panchanathan,et al.  A tale of two defectors: the importance of standing for evolution of indirect reciprocity. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  O. Leimar,et al.  Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  D. Barash The Biology of Moral Systems, Richard D. Alexander. Aldine, Hawthorne, New York (1987), xx, +301. Price $34.95 hardback, $16.95 paperback , 1987 .

[23]  Hisashi Ohtsuki,et al.  Reactive strategies in indirect reciprocity. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[25]  M. Milinski,et al.  Cooperation through indirect reciprocity: image scoring or standing strategy? , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Karl Sigmund,et al.  The good, the bad and the discriminator--errors in direct and indirect reciprocity. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  Cooperation Among Strangers with Limited Information About Reputation , 2003 .

[28]  David M. Messick,et al.  Frontiers in Social Dilemmas Research , 1996 .