Female preference functions based on call duration in the gray tree frog (Hyla versicolor)

Preference functions, which quantify preference strength relative to variation in male traits or signals, are central to understanding mechanisms and consequences of female choice. Female tree frogs (Hyla versicolor) choose mates on the basis of advertisement calls and prefer long calls to short calls. Here we show, in two experimental designs, that preference strength increased significantly as the difference in call duration was increased only if the absolute durations of alternative stimuli were below average. Hence preference strength was a non-linear function of duration, and females did not base preferences solely on the percentage difference in duration. In experiments simulating costly choice (unequal playback levels), non-linear effects were more pronounced than in the conventional design (equal playback levels). Repeated estimates of preference strength using the unequal-playback design revealed significant among-female variation. These patterns of preference suggest that selection by female choice for males producing calls of average duration over males producing very short calls is stronger than selection for males producing very long calls over males producing calls of average duration. Female preferences, especially in tests simulating a potentially costly choice, could reflect differences in the net benefits to females of mating with males producing calls of different duration. Key words: preference function, preference strength, advertisement calls, call duration, repeatability, Hyla versicolor. [Behav Ecol 11:663–669 (2000)]

[1]  Consistency of female choice in the túngara frog: a permissive preference for complex characters , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  W. Yost Fundamentals of hearing: An introduction , 1977 .

[3]  W. Cade,et al.  Phenotypic variation in the mating preferences of female field crickets, Gryllus integer , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  K. Shaw,et al.  Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  G. Klump,et al.  Use of non-arbitrary acoustic criteria in mate choice by female gray tree frogs , 1987, Nature.

[6]  M. Petrie,et al.  VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[7]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  SPECIATION BY POLYPLOIDY IN TREEFROGS: MULTIPLE ORIGINS OF THE TETRAPLOID, HYLA VERSICOLOR , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  A. Basolo Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Andrew Pomiankowski,et al.  The evolution of female mating preferences for male genetic quality , 1988 .

[10]  B. Sullivan,et al.  Female choice and selection on male calling behaviour in the grey treefrog Hyla versicolor , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. , 1998, Science.

[12]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1961 .

[13]  M. Ritchie,et al.  The shape of female mating preferences. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  T. Weber,et al.  Variance in female responses to the fine structure of male song in the field cricket, Gryllus integer , 1998 .

[15]  William E. Wagner Measuring female mating preferences , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Dynamic properties of the advertisement calls of gray tree frogs: patterns of variability and female choice , 1996 .

[17]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  A. Pomiankowski,et al.  The genetic basis of female mate preferences , 1995 .

[19]  R. Iman,et al.  Rank Transformations as a Bridge between Parametric and Nonparametric Statistics , 1981 .

[20]  D. Falconer Introduction to quantitative genetics. 1. ed. , 1984 .

[21]  R. Meldola Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.

[22]  Stevan F Arnold,et al.  Multivariate Inheritance and Evolution: a Review of Concepts , 2022 .

[23]  K. Wells,et al.  Individual, nightly, and seasonal variation in calling behavior of the gray tree frog, Hyla versicolor: implications for energy expenditure , 1994 .

[24]  A. Basolo,et al.  Female preference for male sword length in the green swordtail, Xiphophorus helleri (Pisces: Poeciliidae) , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  K. Pfennig Female spadefoot toads compromise on mate quality to ensure conspecific matings , 2000 .

[26]  Michael D. Jennions,et al.  Repeatability of mate choice: the effect of size in the African painted reed frog, Hyperolius marmoratus , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  J W Seaman,et al.  Caveat emptor: rank transform methods and interaction. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  INTERSPECIFIC GENETICS OF MATE RECOGNITION: INHERITANCE OF FEMALE ACOUSTIC PREFERENCE IN HAWAIIAN CRICKETS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  MATING PREFERENCE FUNCTIONS OF INDIVIDUAL FEMALE BARKING TREEFROGS, HYLA GRATIOSA, FOR TWO PROPERTIES OF MALE ADVERTISEMENT CALLS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.