Female preference functions based on call duration in the gray tree frog (Hyla versicolor)
暂无分享,去创建一个
H. Carl Gerhardt | H. Gerhardt | Steven D. Tanner | Candice M. Corrigan | Hilary C. Walton | S. Tanner | H. C. Walton
[1] Consistency of female choice in the túngara frog: a permissive preference for complex characters , 1998, Animal Behaviour.
[2] W. Yost. Fundamentals of hearing: An introduction , 1977 .
[3] W. Cade,et al. Phenotypic variation in the mating preferences of female field crickets, Gryllus integer , 1995, Animal Behaviour.
[4] K. Shaw,et al. Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[5] G. Klump,et al. Use of non-arbitrary acoustic criteria in mate choice by female gray tree frogs , 1987, Nature.
[6] M. Petrie,et al. VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[7] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. SPECIATION BY POLYPLOIDY IN TREEFROGS: MULTIPLE ORIGINS OF THE TETRAPLOID, HYLA VERSICOLOR , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[8] A. Basolo. Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[9] Andrew Pomiankowski,et al. The evolution of female mating preferences for male genetic quality , 1988 .
[10] B. Sullivan,et al. Female choice and selection on male calling behaviour in the grey treefrog Hyla versicolor , 1992, Animal Behaviour.
[11] R. D. Semlitsch,et al. Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. , 1998, Science.
[12] D. Falconer,et al. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1961 .
[13] M. Ritchie,et al. The shape of female mating preferences. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[14] T. Weber,et al. Variance in female responses to the fine structure of male song in the field cricket, Gryllus integer , 1998 .
[15] William E. Wagner. Measuring female mating preferences , 1998, Animal Behaviour.
[16] H. Gerhardt,et al. Dynamic properties of the advertisement calls of gray tree frogs: patterns of variability and female choice , 1996 .
[17] H. Gerhardt,et al. Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria , 1991, Animal Behaviour.
[18] A. Pomiankowski,et al. The genetic basis of female mate preferences , 1995 .
[19] R. Iman,et al. Rank Transformations as a Bridge between Parametric and Nonparametric Statistics , 1981 .
[20] D. Falconer. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 1. ed. , 1984 .
[21] R. Meldola. Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.
[22] Stevan F Arnold,et al. Multivariate Inheritance and Evolution: a Review of Concepts , 2022 .
[23] K. Wells,et al. Individual, nightly, and seasonal variation in calling behavior of the gray tree frog, Hyla versicolor: implications for energy expenditure , 1994 .
[24] A. Basolo,et al. Female preference for male sword length in the green swordtail, Xiphophorus helleri (Pisces: Poeciliidae) , 1990, Animal Behaviour.
[25] K. Pfennig. Female spadefoot toads compromise on mate quality to ensure conspecific matings , 2000 .
[26] Michael D. Jennions,et al. Repeatability of mate choice: the effect of size in the African painted reed frog, Hyperolius marmoratus , 1995, Animal Behaviour.
[27] J W Seaman,et al. Caveat emptor: rank transform methods and interaction. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[28] INTERSPECIFIC GENETICS OF MATE RECOGNITION: INHERITANCE OF FEMALE ACOUSTIC PREFERENCE IN HAWAIIAN CRICKETS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[29] MATING PREFERENCE FUNCTIONS OF INDIVIDUAL FEMALE BARKING TREEFROGS, HYLA GRATIOSA, FOR TWO PROPERTIES OF MALE ADVERTISEMENT CALLS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.