Call combinations in birds and the evolution of compositional syntax

Syntax is the set of rules for combining words into phrases, providing the basis for the generative power of linguistic expressions. In human language, the principle of compositionality governs how words are combined into a larger unit, the meaning of which depends on both the meanings of the words and the way in which they are combined. This linguistic capability, i.e., compositional syntax, has long been considered a trait unique to human language. Here, we review recent studies on call combinations in a passerine bird, the Japanese tit (Parus minor), that provide the first firm evidence for compositional syntax in a nonhuman animal. While it has been suggested that the findings of these studies fail to provide evidence for compositionality in Japanese tits, this criticism is based on misunderstanding of experimental design, misrepresentation of the importance of word order in human syntax, and necessitating linguistic capabilities beyond those given by the standard definition of compositionality. We argue that research on avian call combinations has provided the first steps in elucidating how compositional expressions could have emerged in animal communication systems.

[1]  Toshitaka N Suzuki,et al.  From bird calls to human language: exploring the evolutionary drivers of compositional syntax , 2018, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[2]  Toshitaka N Suzuki,et al.  Experimental evidence for compositional syntax in bird calls , 2016, Nature Communications.

[3]  Klaus Zuberbühler,et al.  Language evolution: Semantic combinations in primate calls , 2006, Nature.

[4]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002 .

[5]  Sabrina Engesser,et al.  Meaningful call combinations and compositional processing in the southern pied babbler , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Toshitaka N. Suzuki Communication about predator type by a bird using discrete, graded and combinatorial variation in alarm calls , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  R. Berwick,et al.  Songs to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Toshitaka N. Suzuki Alarm calls evoke a visual search image of a predator in birds , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  C. Scharff,et al.  Twitter evolution: converging mechanisms in birdsong and human speech , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  W. Tecumseh Fitch The Evolution of Language by W. Tecumseh Fitch , 2010 .

[11]  K. Zuberbühler,et al.  Campbell's monkeys concatenate vocalizations into context-specific call sequences , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Nobuyuki Kutsukake,et al.  Foraging intention affects whether willow tits call to attract members of mixed-species flocks , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[13]  K. Zuberbühler,et al.  Compositionality in animals and humans , 2018, PLoS biology.

[14]  Johan J Bolhuis,et al.  Meaningful syntactic structure in songbird vocalizations? , 2018, PLoS biology.

[15]  Philippe Schlenker,et al.  What Do Monkey Calls Mean? , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.