Influences of general computer experience and age on library database search performance

Two experiments examined the effects of general computer experience and age on library system search performance among novice library system users. Twenty younger adults (10 with high and 10 with low computer experience) and 20 older adults (10 with low and 10 with no computer experience) performed 10 search tasks of varying difficulty. Search success, syntax errors, database field specifications, keyword specifications, and use of Boolean operators were examined. Among younger novices, high computer experience was associated with slightly better performance than low computer experience. Among older novices, having some computer experience was associated with much better performance than no computer experience. Older computer users showed lower overall success rates, made more syntax and field specification errors, and demonstrated poorer understanding of Boolean logic and keyword matching algorithms than younger adults with similar computer experience. Implications for interface design and training interventions for novice on-line library system users are discussed.

[1]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Users, User Interfaces, and Objects: Envision, a Digital Library , 1993, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Larry Millsap,et al.  Search Patterns of Remote Users: An Analysis of OPAC Transaction Logs. , 1993 .

[3]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Measuring Skill Acquisition and Retention with an ATM Simulator: The Need for Age-Specific Training , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Assessing the usability of on-line library systems , 1998, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[5]  Terry Ballard.  Comparative Searching Styles of Patrons and Staff. , 1994 .

[6]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  User Misconceptions of Information Retrieval Systems , 1988, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[7]  Richard A. Sit.  Online library catalog search performance by older adult users , 1998 .

[8]  D. Wechsler.  WAIS-R manual : Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised , 1981 .

[9]  D. Plude,et al.  Aging, selective attention, and feature integration. , 1989, Psychology and aging.

[10]  Richard A. Sit,et al.  Online Library Catalogs: Age-Related Differences in Query Construction and Error Recovery , 1996 .

[11]  W. Hoyer,et al.  Age and the selectivity of visual information processing. , 1986, Psychology and aging.

[12]  Sara J. Czaja,et al.  Age related differences in learning to use a text-editing system , 1989 .

[13]  Pat Ensor.  User practices in keyword and Boolean searching on an online public access catalog , 1992 .

[14]  J. M. Budd,et al.  An investigation of the use of an online catalog : user characteristics and transaction log analysis , 1995 .

[15]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Why Are Online Catalogs Still Hard to Use? , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Charles R. Hildreth,et al.  Online Public Access Catalogs: The User Interface , 1982 .

[17]  Douglas Ferguson,et al.  The CLR Public Online Catalog Study: An Overview. , 1982 .

[18]  Ruth B. Ekstrom,et al.  Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests , 1976 .

[19]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  The Influence of Age and Experience on the Performance of a Data Entry Task , 1997 .

[20]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  A Survey of Automatic Teller Machine Usage across the Adult Life Span , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[21]  Loanne Snavely,et al.  What Users Really Think: How They See and Find Serials in the Arts and Sciences , 1996 .

[22]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View , 1988 .

[23]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Why are online catalogs hard to use? Lessons learned from information-retrieval studies , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..