Object-specific and relational learning in pigeons

Abstract or relational stimulus processing requires an organism to appreciate the interrelations between or among two or more stimuli (e.g., same or different, less than or greater than). In the current study, we explored the role of concrete and abstract information processing in pigeons performing a visual categorization task which could be solved by attending to either the specific objects presented or the relation among the objects. In Experiment 1, we gave pigeons three training phases in which we gradually increased the variability (that is, the number of object arrays) in the training set. In Experiment 2, we trained a second group of pigeons with an even larger number of object arrays from the outset. We found that, the larger the variability in the training exemplars, the lesser the pigeons’ attention to object-specific information and the greater their attention to relational information; nevertheless, the contribution of object-specific information to categorization performance was never completely eliminated. This pervasive influence of object-specific information is not peculiar to animals, but has been observed in young children and human adults as well.

[1]  Edward A. Wasserman,et al.  The Oxford handbook of comparative cognition , 2012 .

[2]  Ken Kelley,et al.  Methods for the Behavioral, Educational, and Social Sciences: An R package , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[3]  Sharon L. Greene,et al.  Pigeon visual memory capacity. , 1984 .

[4]  Fabian A. Soto,et al.  Asymmetrical interactions in the perception of face identity and emotional expression are not unique to the primate visual system. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[5]  Jonathan R. Rein,et al.  Assessing the concreteness of relational representation. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  B. Ross Distinguishing Types of Superficial Similarities: Different Effects on the Access and Use of Earlier Problems , 1989 .

[7]  E A Wasserman,et al.  Same-different conceptualization by baboons (Papio papio): the role of entropy. , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[8]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Effects of number of items on the baboon’s discrimination of same from different visual displays , 2001, Animal Cognition.

[9]  Fabian A. Soto,et al.  A category-overshadowing effect in pigeons: support for the Common Elements Model of object categorization learning. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[10]  J. Lorber BELIEVING IS SEEING: , 1993 .

[11]  E A Wasserman,et al.  Pigeons show same-different conceptualization after training with complex visual stimuli. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[12]  Lloyd J. Frei,et al.  Recent advances in operant conditioning technology: A versatile and affordable computerized touchscreen system , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[13]  Leyre Castro,et al.  How special is sameness for pigeons and people? , 2012, Animal Cognition.

[14]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Relational Discrimination Learning in Pigeons , 2012 .

[15]  L. Barsalou Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  D. Gentner,et al.  Analogical encoding facilitates knowledge transfer in negotiation , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  Derek C. Penn,et al.  Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  Marc T. Tomlinson,et al.  Learning Abstract Relations Through Analogy to Concrete Exemplars , 2006 .

[19]  Leyre Castro,et al.  Effects of training condition on the contribution of specific items to relational processing in baboons (Papio papio) , 2013, Animal Cognition.

[20]  L. Tyler,et al.  Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  A. Wright,et al.  Same/different abstract-concept learning by pigeons. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[22]  Leyre Castro,et al.  Pigeons' tracking of relevant attributes in categorization learning. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition.

[23]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Fostering general transfer with specific simulations , 2009 .

[25]  Jeffrey S. Katz,et al.  Pigeon same-different concept learning with multiple stimulus classes. , 1997 .

[26]  Benjamin Naumann The Architecture Of Cognition , 2016 .

[27]  Jennifer A. Kaminski,et al.  The advantage of simple symbols for learning and transfer , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  J. Bachevalier,et al.  Mechanisms of same/different abstract-concept learning by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[29]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[30]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Cognitive Aspects of Stimulus Control , 2018 .

[31]  The dimensional nature of same-different discrimination behavior in pigeons. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[32]  Leyre Castro,et al.  Changes in area affect figure–ground assignment in pigeons , 2010, Vision Research.

[33]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Reuniting perception and conception , 1998, Cognition.

[34]  E. Visalberghi,et al.  Identity concept learning in matching-to-sample tasks by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[35]  Leyre Castro,et al.  Pigeons exhibit contextual cueing to both simple and complex backgrounds , 2014, Behavioural Processes.

[36]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[37]  D. Homa,et al.  Category Breadth and the Abstraction of Prototypical Information. , 1976 .

[38]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  The limits of a distributed account of conceptual knowledge , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  Leyre Castro,et al.  Same-different categorization in rats. , 2012, Learning & memory.

[40]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Same-different discrimination: the keel and backbone of thought and reasoning. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[41]  L. Brooks,et al.  Specializing the operation of an explicit rule , 1991 .

[42]  D. Gentner,et al.  Comparison and Categorization in the Development of Relational Similarity , 1996 .

[43]  V. Sloutsky,et al.  When Looks Are Everything Appearance Similarity Versus Kind Information in Early , 2007 .

[44]  Edward A Wasserman,et al.  Conditional same-different discrimination by pigeons: acquisition and generalization to novel and few-item displays. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[45]  C. L. Morgan An introduction to comparative psychology , 1900 .

[46]  S. Christie Relational Similarity in Identity Relation : The Role of Language , 2011 .

[47]  Almut Kelber,et al.  A harbor seal can transfer the same/different concept to new stimulus dimensions , 2013, Animal Cognition.

[48]  Heidi Kloos,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article When Looks Are Everything Appearance Similarity Versus Kind Information in Early Induction , 2022 .

[49]  Edward A. Wasserman,et al.  Pigeons learn virtual patterned-string problems in a computerized touchscreen environment: (598032013-076) , 2013 .

[50]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  How abstract is symbolic thought? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[51]  Leyre Castro,et al.  Variations on variability: effects of display composition on same–different discrimination in pigeons , 2012, Learning & behavior.

[52]  John E. Hummel,et al.  Varieties of sameness: the impact of relational complexity on perceptual comparisons , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[53]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Pigeons learn stimulus identity and stimulus relations when both serve as redundant, relevant cues during same-different discrimination training. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[54]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[55]  R. Cook,et al.  Pigeon same-different concept learning with multiple stimulus classes. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[56]  Edward A. Wasserman,et al.  View-invariance learning in object recognition by pigeons depends on error-driven associative learning processes , 2012, Vision Research.

[57]  Aaron P Blaisdell,et al.  Two-itemsame-different concept learning in pigeons , 2005, Learning & behavior.