Assessing and visualizing uncertainty of 3D geological surfaces using level sets with stochastic motion

Abstract For many geoscience applications, prediction requires building complex 3D surface models. Because of such complexity, often only a single model is built, possibly with a small set of variants to represent the uncertainty. Recent advancement in implicit modeling has made the construction of 3D geological models simpler; however, automatic assessment and visualization of uncertainty constrained by input geological rules and data constraints is still an active research topic. In this paper, we propose a new method that directly assesses and visualizes the uncertainty of geological surfaces by the means of stochastic motion. We represent the geological surfaces as the addition of stochastic implicit conceptual models and residual functions subject to the constraints of data and geological age relationships. Two sampling approaches to create the stochastic motion are proposed: Monte Carlo and Markov chain Monte Carlo (McMC). The uncertainty is assessed by independent realizations drawn by Monte Carlo sampling. The uncertainty is visualized by a “smooth” movie of gradually evolving geological surfaces that have the same stationary distribution as Monte Carlo, sampled by Markov chain Monte Carlo (McMC). This idea is integrated into the level set equation. Level sets are an ideal way to represent mathematically complex surfaces without explicit grid representations, thereby having the advantage of avoiding tedious topological computations such as defining the connectivity of a surface. We illustrate this new idea with simple synthetic 3D examples, taking the constraints of data and geological age relationships into consideration. Finally, we illustrate the idea using a synthetic data set from a copper deposit, where dense drillholes constrain an ore body with seven different lithologies. Our method provides a direct assessment and visualization of the uncertainty of 3D geological surfaces.

[1]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  Assessing quality of urban underground spaces by coupling 3D geological models: The case study of Foshan city, South China , 2016, Comput. Geosci..

[2]  Pierre Thore,et al.  Structural uncertainties: Determination, management, and applications , 2002 .

[3]  Jef Caers,et al.  VRGE: An Immersive Visualization Application for the Geosciences , 2018, 2018 IEEE Scientific Visualization Conference (SciVis).

[4]  P. Green Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination , 1995 .

[5]  Alexandre Boucher,et al.  Applied Geostatistics with SGeMS: A User's Guide , 2009 .

[6]  J. Mallet Elements of Mathematical Sedimentary Geology: the GeoChron Model , 2014 .

[7]  M. Jessell,et al.  Uncertainty estimation for a geological model of the Sandstone greenstone belt, Western Australia – insights from integrated geological and geophysical inversion in a Bayesian inference framework , 2017, Special Publications.

[8]  J. Sethian,et al.  Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations , 1988 .

[9]  S. Osher,et al.  Fast surface reconstruction using the level set method , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Variational and Level Set Methods in Computer Vision.

[10]  Guillaume Caumon,et al.  Method for Stochastic Inverse Modeling of Fault Geometry and Connectivity Using Flow Data , 2012, Mathematical Geosciences.

[11]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[12]  Jef Caers,et al.  Modeling Uncertainty in the Earth Sciences , 2011 .

[13]  James A. Sethian,et al.  The Fast Construction of Extension Velocities in Level Set Methods , 1999 .

[14]  Tobias Frank,et al.  3D-reconstruction of complex geological interfaces from irregularly distributed and noisy point data , 2007, Comput. Geosci..

[15]  A. Cruden,et al.  Regional dome evolution and its control on ore-grade distribution: Insights from 3D implicit modelling of the Navachab gold deposit, Namibia , 2015 .

[16]  C. Lajaunie,et al.  Foliation fields and 3D cartography in geology: Principles of a method based on potential interpolation , 1997 .

[17]  F. Horowitz,et al.  Towards incorporating uncertainty of structural data in 3D geological inversion , 2010 .

[18]  John W. Fisher,et al.  MCMC Curve Sampling for Image Segmentation , 2007, MICCAI.

[19]  M. Jessell,et al.  Geodiversity: Exploration of 3D geological model space , 2013 .

[20]  E. Holden,et al.  Semiautomated quantification of the influence of data richness on confidence in the geologic interpretation of aeromagnetic maps , 2013 .

[21]  P. Thore,et al.  Modelling of stochastic faults and fault networks in a structural uncertainty study , 2001, Petroleum Geoscience.

[22]  S. Aanonsen,et al.  Continuous Facies Updating Using the Ensemble Kalman Filter and the Level Set Method , 2011 .

[23]  J. Chilès,et al.  Geological modelling from field data and geological knowledge. Part I. Modelling method coupling 3D potential-field interpolation and geological rules , 2008 .

[24]  David E. Breen,et al.  Editing Geometric Models , 2003 .

[25]  T. Hansen,et al.  Inverse problems with non-trivial priors: efficient solution through sequential Gibbs sampling , 2012, Computational Geosciences.

[26]  Rachida Bouhlila,et al.  3D geological modeling of the Kasserine Aquifer System, Central Tunisia: New insights into aquifer-geometry and interconnections for a better assessment of groundwater resources , 2016 .

[27]  J. Chilès,et al.  Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty , 1999 .

[28]  Phaedon C. Kyriakidis,et al.  Geostatistical Space–Time Models: A Review , 1999 .

[29]  H. Omre Bayesian kriging—Merging observations and qualified guesses in kriging , 1987 .

[30]  Guillaume Caumon,et al.  Three-Dimensional Implicit Stratigraphic Model Building From Remote Sensing Data on Tetrahedral Meshes: Theory and Application to a Regional Model of La Popa Basin, NE Mexico , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[31]  M. Jessell,et al.  Locating and quantifying geological uncertainty in three-dimensional models: Analysis of the Gippsland Basin, southeastern Australia , 2012 .

[32]  L. Holden,et al.  Stochastic Structural Modeling , 2003 .

[33]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Visualizing spatial data uncertainty using animation , 1997 .

[34]  B. Lévy,et al.  Stochastic simulations of fault networks in 3D structural modeling. , 2010 .

[35]  J. Wellmann,et al.  Structural geologic modeling as an inference problem: A Bayesian perspective , 2016 .

[36]  A. Jewbali,et al.  Modeling Combined Geological and Grade Uncertainty: Application of Multiple-Point Simulation at the Apensu Gold Deposit, Ghana , 2013, Mathematical Geosciences.

[37]  Marco A. Iglesias,et al.  A Bayesian Level Set Method for Geometric Inverse Problems , 2015, 1504.00313.

[38]  L. Hu Gradual Deformation and Iterative Calibration of Gaussian-Related Stochastic Models , 2000 .

[39]  G. Caumon,et al.  Stochastic structural modelling in sparse data situations , 2015 .

[40]  Jef Caers,et al.  Comparing the Gradual Deformation with the Probability Perturbation Method for Solving Inverse Problems , 2007 .

[41]  J. Wellmann,et al.  Uncertainties have a meaning: Information entropy as a quality measure for 3-D geological models , 2012 .

[42]  Ognjen Grujic,et al.  Quantifying Uncertainty in Subsurface Systems , 2018, Quantifying Uncertainty in Subsurface Systems.

[43]  Ronald Fedkiw,et al.  A review of level-set methods and some recent applications , 2018, J. Comput. Phys..

[44]  G. Mariéthoz,et al.  Multiple-point Geostatistics: Stochastic Modeling with Training Images , 2014 .

[45]  M. Sambridge,et al.  Monte Carlo analysis of inverse problems , 2002 .

[46]  Aurèle Parriaux,et al.  Geological uncertainties associated with 3-D subsurface models , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[47]  Renaud Keriven,et al.  Stochastic Motion and the Level Set Method in Computer Vision: Stochastic Active Contours , 2006, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[48]  P. Abrahamsen,et al.  An Uncertainty Model for Fault Shape and Location , 2014, Mathematical Geosciences.

[49]  G. Caumon,et al.  Elements for Stochastic Structural Perturbation of Stratigraphic Models , 2007 .

[50]  J. Medhi,et al.  Stochastic Processes , 1982 .

[51]  Yalchin Efendiev,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification in History Matching of Channelized Reservoirs using Markov Chain Level Set Approaches , 2011, ANSS 2011.

[52]  J. Caers,et al.  Quantifying structural uncertainty on fault networks using a marked point process within a Bayesian framework , 2017 .

[53]  Guillaume Caumon,et al.  Towards Stochastic Time-Varying Geological Modeling , 2010 .

[54]  Ítalo Gomes Gonçalves,et al.  A machine learning approach to the potential-field method for implicit modeling of geological structures , 2017, Comput. Geosci..