Conventional semblance velocity analysis is equivalent to modeling prestack seismic data with events that have hyperbolic moveout but no amplitude variation with offset (AVO). As a result of its assumption that amplitude is independent of offset, this method might be expected to perform poorly for events with strong AVO—especially for events with polarity reversals at large offset, such as reflections from tops of some class 1 and class 2 sands. We find that substantial amplitude variation and even phase change with offset do not compromise the conventional semblance measure greatly. Polarity reversal, however, causes conventional semblance to fail.The semblance method can be extended to take into account data with events that have amplitude variation, expressed by AVO intercept and gradient (i.e., the Shuey approximation). However, because of the extra degrees of freedom introduced in AVO‐sensitive semblance, resolution of the estimated velocities is decreased. This is because the data can be modeled acc...
[1]
John P. Castagna,et al.
AVO and velocity analysis
,
2001
.
[2]
Michel Kern,et al.
Inversion of reflection seismograms by differential semblance analysis: algorithm structure and synthetic examples1
,
1994
.
[3]
Scott B. Smithson,et al.
New approach to seismic-reflection event detection and velocity determination
,
1990
.
[4]
Clement Kostov,et al.
High-resolution velocity spectra using eigenstructure methods
,
1989
.
[5]
R. T. Shuey,et al.
A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations
,
1985
.
[6]
M. Turhan Taner,et al.
Velocity spectra-digital computer derivation and applications of velocity functions
,
1969
.