Accounting for Taste: Ranking Curators and Content in Social Networks

Ranking users in social networks is a well-studied problem, typically solved by algorithms that leverage network structure to identify influential users and recommend people to follow. In the last decade, however, curation --- users sharing and promoting content in a network --- has become a central social activity, as platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, and GitHub drive growth and engagement by connecting users through content and content to users. While existing algorithms reward users that are highly active with higher rankings, they fail to account for users' curatorial taste. This paper introduces CuRank, an algorithm for ranking users and content in social networks by explicitly modeling three characteristics of a good curator: discerning taste, high activity, and timeliness. We evaluate CuRank on datasets from two popular social networks --- GitHub and Vine --- and demonstrate its efficacy at ranking content and identifying good curators.

[1]  Hongyuan Zha,et al.  Co-ranking Authors and Documents in a Heterogeneous Network , 2007, Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2007).

[2]  Chris Arney,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World (Easley, D. and Kleinberg, J.; 2010) [Book Review] , 2013, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[3]  Jimmy J. Lin,et al.  WTF: the who to follow service at Twitter , 2013, WWW.

[4]  Michael A. Zarro,et al.  Social curation on the website Pinterest.com , 2012, ASIST.

[5]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Sampling from large graphs , 2006, KDD '06.

[6]  M. Kendall A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION , 1938 .

[7]  E. David,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World , 2010 .

[8]  Robert H. Halstead,et al.  Matrix Computations , 2011, Encyclopedia of Parallel Computing.

[9]  Martine De Cock,et al.  Ranking Approaches for Microblog Search , 2010, 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[10]  Qi He,et al.  TwitterRank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers , 2010, WSDM '10.

[11]  Yizhou Sun,et al.  Ranking-based clustering of heterogeneous information networks with star network schema , 2009, KDD.

[12]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[13]  Shlomo Moran,et al.  The stochastic approach for link-structure analysis (SALSA) and the TKC effect , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[14]  James Caverlee,et al.  PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  Specialization, homophily, and gender in a social curation site: findings from pinterest , 2014, CSCW.

[16]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[17]  Yan Liu,et al.  What is Tumblr: a statistical overview and comparison , 2014, SKDD.

[18]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Social coding in GitHub: transparency and collaboration in an open software repository , 2012, CSCW.

[19]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[20]  Dongwon Lee,et al.  Exploring Tag-based Like Networks , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[21]  Saeideh Bakhshi,et al.  "I need to try this"?: a statistical overview of pinterest , 2013, CHI.