Functional significance of stiffness in adaptation of multijoint arm movements to stable and unstable dynamics

This study compared the mechanisms of adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics from the perspective of changes in joint mechanics. Subjects were instructed to make point to point movements in force fields generated by a robotic manipulandum which interacted with the arm in either a stable or an unstable manner. After subjects adjusted to the initial disturbing effects of the force fields they were able to produce normal straight movements to the target. In the case of the stable interaction, subjects modified the joint torques in order to appropriately compensate for the force field. No change in joint torque or endpoint force was required or observed in the case of the unstable interaction. After adaptation, the endpoint stiffness of the arm was measured by applying displacements to the hand in eight different directions midway through the movements. This was compared to the stiffness measured similarly during movements in a null force field. After adaptation, the endpoint stiffness under both the stable and unstable dynamics was modified relative to the null field. Adaptation to unstable dynamics was achieved by selective modification of endpoint stiffness in the direction of the instability. To investigate whether the change in endpoint stiffness could be accounted for by change in joint torque or endpoint force, we estimated the change in stiffness on each trial based on the change in joint torque relative to the null field. For stable dynamics the change in endpoint stiffness was accurately predicted. However, for unstable dynamics the change in endpoint stiffness could not be reproduced. In fact, the predicted endpoint stiffness was similar to that in the null force field. Thus, the change in endpoint stiffness seen after adaptation to stable dynamics was directly related to changes in net joint torque necessary to compensate for the dynamics in contrast to adaptation to unstable dynamics, where a selective change in endpoint stiffness occurred without any modification of net joint torque.

[1]  C. Marsden,et al.  Stretch reflex and servo action in a variety of human muscles. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Electromyographic response to pseudo-random torque disturbances of human forearm position , 1978, Neuroscience.

[3]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[4]  I. Hunter,et al.  Dynamics of human ankle stiffness: variation with mean ankle torque. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  S. Cannon,et al.  The mechanical behavior of active human skeletal muscle in small oscillations. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  K. Akazawa,et al.  Modulation of reflex EMG and stiffness in response to stretch of human finger muscle. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  W. Rymer,et al.  Characteristics of synergic relations during isometric contractions of human elbow muscles. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  P. Matthews Observations on the automatic compensation of reflex gain on varying the pre‐existing level of motor discharge in man. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  I W Hunter,et al.  Human ankle joint stiffness over the full range of muscle activation levels. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Compliance of single joints: elastic and plastic characteristics. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  M. Flanders,et al.  Arm muscle activation for static forces in three-dimensional space. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  R. R. Carter,et al.  Stiffness regulation by reflex action in the normal human hand. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Z. Hasan,et al.  Timing and magnitude of electromyographic activity for two-joint arm movements in different directions. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  C. Erkelens,et al.  Dependence of autogenic and heterogenic stretch reflexes on pre‐load activity in the human arm. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  R. R. Carter,et al.  Nonlinear stretch reflex interaction during cocontraction. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  N. A. Borghese,et al.  Time-varying mechanical behavior of multijointed arm in man. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  W. Rymer,et al.  Muscle stiffness during transient and continuous movements of cat muscle: perturbation characteristics and physiological relevance , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  I. Hunter,et al.  Analysis of short-latency reflexes in human elbow flexor muscles. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Equilibrium-Point Control Hypothesis Examined by Measured Arm Stiffness During Multijoint Movement , 1996, Science.

[22]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Human arm stiffness and equilibrium-point trajectory during multi-joint movement , 1997, Biological Cybernetics.

[23]  J R Flanagan,et al.  The Role of Internal Models in Motion Planning and Control: Evidence from Grip Force Adjustments during Movements of Hand-Held Loads , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  F. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  D. Ostry,et al.  Independent coactivation of shoulder and elbow muscles , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  H. Gomi,et al.  Task-Dependent Viscoelasticity of Human Multijoint Arm and Its Spatial Characteristics for Interaction with Environments , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  K. Newell,et al.  Noise, information transmission, and force variability. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  R Shadmehr,et al.  Electromyographic Correlates of Learning an Internal Model of Reaching Movements , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  H. Gomi,et al.  Multijoint muscle regulation mechanisms examined by measured human arm stiffness and EMG signals. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  John W. Krakauer,et al.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  E Burdet,et al.  A method for measuring endpoint stiffness during multi-joint arm movements. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  R. Johansson,et al.  Sensorimotor prediction and memory in object manipulation. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[33]  P. Crago,et al.  Effects of voluntary force generation on the elastic components of endpoint stiffness , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  N Hogan,et al.  Stability in Force-Production Tasks , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.

[35]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Learning the dynamics of reaching movements results in the modification of arm impedance and long-latency perturbation responses , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[36]  Rieko Osu,et al.  The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance , 2001, Nature.

[37]  D. J. Bennett Torques generated at the human elbow joint in response to constant position errors imposed during voluntary movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  Neville Hogan,et al.  The mechanics of multi-joint posture and movement control , 1985, Biological Cybernetics.

[39]  C. J. Erkelens,et al.  Task-dependent differences between mono- and bi-articular heads of the triceps brachii muscle , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[41]  C. C. A. M. Gielen,et al.  Differences in central control of m. biceps brachii in movement tasks and force tasks , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  Charles Capaday,et al.  A re-examination of the effects of instruction on the long-latency stretch reflex response of the flexor pollicis longus muscle , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  C. C. A. M. Gielen,et al.  Differences in the activation of m. biceps brachii in the control of slow isotonic movements and isometric contractions , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The control of stable postures in the multijoint arm , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[45]  T. Milner,et al.  Inability to activate muscles maximally during cocontraction and the effect on joint stiffness , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.