Why clinicians are natural bayesians

Thought you didn't understand bayesian statistics? Read on and find out why doctors are expert in applying the theory, whether they realise it or not Two main approaches are used to draw statistical inferences: frequentist and bayesian. Both are valid, although they differ methodologically and perhaps philosophically. However, the frequentist approach dominates the medical literature and is increasingly applied in clinical settings. This is ironic given that clinicians apply bayesian reasoning in framing and revising differential diagnoses without necessarily undergoing, or requiring, any formal training in bayesian statistics. To justify this assertion, this article will explain how bayesian reasoning is a natural part of clinical decision making, particularly as it pertains to the clinical history and physical examination, and how bayesian approaches are a powerful and intuitive approach to the differential diagnosis. On a recent trip to southern Ethiopia, my colleagues and I encountered a severely ill child at a rural health clinic. The child's palms, soles, tongue, and conjunctivae were all white from severe anaemia and his spleen was swollen and firm; he was breathing rapidly, had bilateral pulmonary rales, and was semiconscious. It looked like severe malaria. The clinic's health officer evaluated the child using the integrated management of childhood illness algorithm. The algorithm uses cardinal symptoms such as rapid respiratory rate or fever to classify children as having pneumonia or malaria, or possibly both. In this case, the child's rapid respiratory rate and absence of fever generated a diagnosis of pneumonia with advice to immediately start antibiotics. Our presence was fortuitous. We were able to give the child antimalarial drugs and transport him to the nearest hospital, where blood smear examination confirmed that his blood was teeming with malaria parasites. How did clinical judgments prove superior to the algorithm, a diagnostic tool carefully developed over two decades …

[1]  R. London,et al.  Reliability of Stress Thallium-201 Scanning in the Clinical Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease , 1979, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[2]  D. Castell,et al.  The accuracy of the physical examination in the diagnosis of suspected ascites. , 1982, JAMA.

[3]  Harry P. Selker,et al.  A Tool for Judging Coronary Care Unit Admission Appropriateness, Valid for Both Real-Time and Retrospective Use: A Time-Insensitive Predictive Instrument (TIPI) for Acute Cardiac Ischemia: A Multicenter Study , 1991, Medical care.

[4]  N Devitt The rational clinical examination. , 1992, JAMA.

[5]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: III. How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test: B. What Are the Results and Will They Help Me In Caring for My Patients? , 1994 .

[6]  Gordon H. Guyatt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: III. How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test A. Are the Results of the Study Valid? , 1994 .

[7]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1994, JAMA.

[8]  S. Fletcher,et al.  The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How? , 1999, JAMA.

[9]  D. Simel,et al.  The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm? . , 1999, JAMA.

[10]  D. Simel,et al.  Does This Patient Have Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm , 1999 .

[11]  Mark H. Ebell,et al.  Does This Patient Have Strep Throat , 2000 .

[12]  M H Ebell,et al.  The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have strep throat? , 2000, JAMA.

[13]  K. Myers,et al.  The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have clubbing? , 2001, JAMA.

[14]  K. Myers,et al.  Does This Patient Have Clubbing , 2001 .

[15]  P. Frissen,et al.  Evaluation of the Rapid Immunoassay Determine HIV 1/2 for Detection of Antibodies to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Types 1 and 2 , 2003, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.