The impact of surface integrity by hard turning vs. grinding on fatigue damage mechanisms in rolling contact

Abstract The fundamental knowledge of fatigue damage mechanism is necessary for understanding manufacturing process effects. The traditional method of artificially created surface defects may accelerate crack propagation and fatigue. However, the artificial defects will change the surface integrity and therefore alter the nature of fatigue damage, and thus, the fatigue damage in the presence of artificial defects in literature may not reflect the true mechanism of real-life fatigue processes. This paper studies the fatigue damage resulting from real-life rolling contact tests and finite element analysis of AISI 52100 steel and identifies the possible mechanisms for fatigue failure in the presence of process induced surface integrity. Rolling contact fatigue tests were then performed until surface spalling had occurred. Surface and subsurface fatigue damage of the samples was then characterized using optical and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and surface profiling. Two types of subsurface cracks were observed: main cracks that propagate parallel to the surface due to subsurface shear stress induced fracture/debonding of inclusions or second phase particles. Shear stress induced surface cracks propagate at shallow angles (≈ 35°) from the surface. Branching cracks eventually form and connect the main crack to surface. The crack SEM images show that the formation sequence of fatigue cracks is different for the turned and ground surfaces. Material loss (spalling) occurs as a combined effect of the main, surface, and branching cracks creating small discontinuous sections of material at the surface which are eventually lost after continued rolling.

[1]  A. W. Warren,et al.  Surface Integrity Difference between Hard Turned and Ground Surfaces and Its Impact on Fatigue Life , 2006 .

[2]  Katsuyuki Kida,et al.  Flaking failure originating from a single surface crack in silicon nitride under rolling contact fatigue , 2005 .

[3]  Yuebin Guo,et al.  A fundamental study on the impact of surface integrity by hard turning on rolling contact fatigue , 2006 .

[4]  F. Franklin,et al.  Computer simulation of wear and rolling contact fatigue , 2001 .

[5]  Mark Hadfield,et al.  Rolling contact fatigue failure modes of lubricated silicon nitride in relation to ring crack defects , 1999 .

[6]  Yuebin Guo,et al.  FE-simulation of the effects of machining-induced residual stress profile on rolling contact of hard machined components , 2004 .

[7]  R. Gnanamoorthy,et al.  Study of damage mechanisms and failure analysis of sintered and hardened steels under rolling–sliding contact conditions , 2007 .

[8]  Yuebin Guo,et al.  An experimental investigation of white layer on rolling contact fatigue using acoustic emission technique , 2005 .

[9]  J. J. Kalker,et al.  Rolling contact phenomena , 2000 .

[10]  R. Gnanamoorthy,et al.  Rolling/sliding contact fatigue life prediction of sintered and hardened steels , 2007 .

[11]  Fukuo Hashimoto,et al.  Surface Integrity Generated by Precision Hard Turning , 1999 .

[12]  A. Olver.  The Mechanism of Rolling Contact Fatigue: An Update , 2005 .

[13]  Guangnan Chen,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the effect of laser transformation hardening on crack driving force in steels , 2006 .

[14]  K. Johnson,et al.  The residual stress distribution in a plastically deformed model asperity , 1986 .

[15]  Yuebin Guo,et al.  Modeling of rolling contact fatigue for hard machined components with process-induced residual stress , 2004 .

[16]  P.J.L. Fernandes,et al.  Contact fatigue in rolling-element bearings , 1997 .

[17]  The influence of material build up around artificial defects on rolling contact fatigue life and failure mechanism , 2006 .

[18]  J. Beynon,et al.  Prediction of fatigue crack initiation for rolling contact fatigue , 2000 .