Radiotherapy in pediatric medulloblastoma: quality assessment of Pediatric Oncology Group Trial 9031.

PURPOSE To evaluate the potential influence of radiotherapy quality on survival in high-risk pediatric medulloblastoma patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS Trial 9031 of the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) aimed to study the relative benefit of cisplatin and etoposide randomization of high-risk patients with medulloblastoma to preradiotherapy vs. postradiotherapy treatment. Two-hundred and ten patients were treated according to protocol guidelines and were eligible for the present analysis. Treatment volume (whole brain, spine, posterior fossa, and primary tumor bed) and dose prescription deviations were assessed for each patient. An analysis of first site of failure was undertaken. Event-free and overall survival rates were calculated. A log-rank test was used to determine the significance of potential survival differences between patients with and without major deviations in the radiotherapy procedure. RESULTS Of 160 patients who were fully evaluable for all treatment quality parameters, 91 (57%) had 1 or more major deviations in their treatment schedule. Major deviations by treatment site were brain (26%), spinal (7%), posterior fossa (40%), and primary tumor bed (17%). Major treatment volume or total dose deviations did not significantly influence overall and event-free survival. CONCLUSIONS Despite major treatment deviations in more than half of fully evaluable patients, underdosage or treatment volume misses were not associated with a worse event-free or overall survival.

[1]  P. Rubin,et al.  Cerebellar medulloblastoma: spread and failure patterns following irradiation , 1978 .

[2]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  Pediatric medulloblastoma: radiation treatment technique and patterns of failure. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  J. Lagrange,et al.  Quality control of radiotherapeutic treatment of medulloblastoma in a multicentric study: the contribution of radiotherapy technique to tumour relapse. The French Medulloblastoma Group. , 1992, Radiotherapy and Oncology.

[4]  S. Sallan,et al.  The change in patterns of relapse in medulloblastoma , 1991, Cancer.

[5]  H. Sandler,et al.  Patterns of failure following treatment for medulloblastoma: is it necessary to treat the entire posterior fossa? , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  H. Friedman,et al.  Subfrontal recurrence of medulloblastoma. , 1992, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[7]  J. Galicich,et al.  Supratentorial recurrences in medulloblastoma , 1981, Cancer.

[8]  Postoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radiotherapy as compared to immediate radiotherapy followed by maintenance chemotherapy in the treatment of medulloblastoma in childhood: results of the German prospective randomized trial HIT '91. , 2000 .

[9]  R. Ellenbogen,et al.  Concurrent chemotherapy and reduced-dose cranial spinal irradiation followed by conformal posterior fossa tumor bed boost for average-risk medulloblastoma: efficacy and patterns of failure. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  J. Habrand,et al.  Impact of targeting deviations on outcome in medulloblastoma: study of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology (SFOP). , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  E. Housepian,et al.  An operative staging system and a megavoltage radiotherapeutic technic for cerebellar medulloblastomas. , 1969, Radiology.

[12]  Roger E. Taylor,et al.  Impact of radiotherapy parameters on outcome in the International Society of Paediatric Oncology/United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group PNET-3 study of preradiotherapy chemotherapy for M0-M1 medulloblastoma. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.