Modeling and Performance Assessment of the HyTAQ, a Hybrid Terrestrial/Aerial Quadrotor

This paper analytically and experimentally evaluates the performance of the hybrid terrestrial and aerial quadrotor (HyTAQ) robot. The HyTAQ is composed of a quadrotor hinged at the center of a cylindrical cage. This configuration gives the robot an increased range compared with aerial-only quadrotors and negates any obstacle avoidance issues that are commonly associated with terrestrial-only robots. An accurate dynamical model of the robot is derived, which helps with an in-depth analysis of the system's energy consumption. The analysis quantifies the energy savings during terrestrial locomotion as compared with aerial locomotion. Experimental results validate the analysis and indicate that, depending on the surface, the robot's terrestrial range can be 11 times greater and operational time ten times greater than the aerial range/operation time at equivalent speeds.

[1]  Roger D. Quinn,et al.  Drive train design enabling locomotion transition of a small hybrid air-land vehicle , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[2]  Matthew Spenko,et al.  Design and experimental validation of HyTAQ, a Hybrid Terrestrial and Aerial Quadrotor , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Dario Floreano,et al.  A Collision‐resilient Flying Robot , 2014, J. Field Robotics.

[4]  Daniel Mellinger,et al.  Control of Quadrotors for Robust Perching and Landing , 2010 .

[5]  Philippe Martin,et al.  The true role of accelerometer feedback in quadrotor control , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  K Peterson,et al.  A wing-assisted running robot and implications for avian flight evolution , 2011, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[7]  Steven Lake Waslander,et al.  Aerodynamics and control of autonomous quadrotor helicopters in aggressive maneuvering , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Jae-Bok Song,et al.  Compliant actuation of parallel-type variable stiffness actuator based on antagonistic actuation , 2010 .

[9]  Dario Floreano,et al.  A flying robot with adaptive morphology for multi-modal locomotion , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[10]  William S. Harwin,et al.  Design of Redundant Drive Joint with adjustable stiffness and damping mechanism to improve joint admittance , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[11]  Jonathan E. Clark,et al.  Development and Integration of Adaptive Robotic Multi-Modal System (ARM 2 S) , 2011 .

[12]  Dario Floreano,et al.  An Active Uprighting Mechanism for Flying Robots , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[13]  Tarek Hamel,et al.  Nonlinear control of VTOL UAVs incorporating flapping dynamics , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[14]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A novel actuator with adjustable stiffness (AwAS) , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.