Bibliometric analysis is used to assess the impact' of scientific journals. The commonest method of evaluation is impact factor. The aim of this study was to analyse the citation data for otorhinolaryngology journals of the years 1994 to 1998. Data on the total number of citations and impact factor of journals was obtained from the CD-ROM editions 1994-98 of the Journal Citation Reports and 'Web of Science' database. The adjusted impact factor and five-year impact factor has been calculated. Fifteen otorhinolaryngology journals have been identified and ranked according to the impact factor. Head and Neck has the highest adjusted impact factor. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery has the highest five-year impact factor. There is considerable variation in the ranking of journals calculated by the five-year impact factor. Impact factors of otolaryngology journals can help to direct readers to those journals that have a track record of publishing data that are frequently cited. Although there are several limitations to the use of citation data to rank journals, the authors recommend the use of the five-year period for calculation of the impact factor for ranking of otolaryngology journals.
[1]
P. Seglen,et al.
Education and debate
,
1999,
The Ethics of Public Health.
[2]
P. Gross,et al.
COLLEGE LIBRARIES AND CHEMICAL EDUCATION.
,
1927,
Science.
[3]
E. Garfield.
Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved?
,
1996
.
[4]
H Brazier,et al.
The accuracy of citation and quotation in otolaryngology/head and neck surgery journals.
,
2000,
Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.
[5]
G Taubes,et al.
Measure for measure in science.
,
1993,
Science.
[6]
P. Cleaton-jones,et al.
An ethical dilemma: availability of antiretroviral therapy after clinical trials with hiv infected patients are ended
,
1997,
BMJ.