The Experiences of Intimacy for Adults with Acquired Communication Disorders Using Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)

Background: Intimacy has been described as a primary psychological need. In order to function ‚normally‛, we require repeated, positive interactions with those with whom we are in a caring relationship. To date, research looking at adults with acquired communication disorders who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) has focussed on device selection, providing functional communication, acceptance and use of AAC, and caregiver support. There is a lack of research into how the use of AAC impacts the personal and social lives of adults with acquired communication disorders. The aim of this study was to explore the experience of intimacy and intimate communication from the perspective of individuals who have an acquired communication disorder and use AAC, and from the perspective of their partners. Method: A phenomenological research approach was used to address the study aim. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with five participants with an acquired communication disorder who had used AAC some or all of the time and with their five partners. Joint semi-structured interviews were conducted with four of the couples. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes within the data. Results: Eight key themes emerged from the data, namely effort, importance, time, closeness, adaptation, emotion, identity, and privacy. Within these themes participants discussed how AAC has been both beneficial and detrimental to their intimacy and intimate communication. Discussion and Conclusion: This study has identified a number of important areas that professionals need to consider in order to facilitate successful intimacy and intimate communication for adults with acquired communication disorders who use AAC and for their partners. Future research is needed to identify specific ways speech-language therapists can help this population adapt their communication to make the best use of AAC for intimacy and intimate communication.

[1]  Karen J. Prager The Psychology of Intimacy , 1995 .

[2]  L. Wright Affection and Sexuality in the Presence of Alzheimer's Disease: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[3]  Kristy L. Archuleta,et al.  The effects of trauma on intimate relationships: a qualitative study with clinical couples. , 2006, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[4]  M. Kimelman,et al.  Informed Consent in Aphasia Research: Myth or Reality , 1995 .

[5]  G. Borasio,et al.  Sexuality in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and their partners , 2004, Journal of Neurology.

[6]  Debra Mashek,et al.  Handbook of closeness and intimacy , 2004 .

[7]  Richard S. Hallam,et al.  Persons with acquired profound hearing loss (APHL): how do they and their families adapt to the challenge? , 2008, Health.

[8]  J. Lou,et al.  Purposes of AAC device use for persons with ALS as reported by caregivers , 2006, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[9]  B. Poland 30 Transcription Quality , 2001 .

[10]  Tara L. Jeffs,et al.  Functional Communication in Individuals with Chronic Severe Aphasia Using Augmentative Communication , 2008, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[11]  M M Carr,et al.  Communication after laryngectomy: An assessment of quality of life , 2000, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[12]  Donnah L Anderson,et al.  Couples’ attributions about behaviours modulated by hearing impairment: Links with relationship satisfaction Atribuciones de las parejas acerca de las conductas moduladas por la hipoacusia: vínculos con la satisfacción de la relación de pareja , 2005, International journal of audiology.

[13]  D. Ezzy Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation , 2002 .

[14]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[15]  P. Rabins,et al.  Dementia , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  Elizabeth Baikie,et al.  The impact of dementia on marital relationships , 2002 .

[17]  R. Hétu,et al.  The impact of acquired hearing impairment on intimate relationships: implications for rehabilitation. , 1993, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[18]  Tonya Lippert,et al.  Daily experiences of intimacy: A study of couples , 2001 .

[19]  H. Reis,et al.  Intimacy as an interpersonal process. , 1988 .

[20]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired severe communication disorders , 1988 .

[21]  Stephen N. Calculator,et al.  Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to augmentative and alternative communication: Position Statement , 2005 .

[22]  J. Yorgason,et al.  Acquired hearing impairment in older couple relationships: An exploration of couple resilience processes , 2007 .

[23]  H. Reis,et al.  The relationship context of human behavior and development. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired neurologic disorders , 2000 .

[25]  K. Yorkston,et al.  Augmentative and alternative communication application for persons with severe acquired communication disorders: an introduction , 1989 .

[26]  Judith E. Sturges,et al.  Comparing Telephone and Face-to-Face Qualitative Interviewing: a Research Note , 2004 .

[27]  T. Paslawski,et al.  Incomplete Locked-In Syndrome: Two Cases With Successful Communication Outcomes , 1991 .

[28]  Rita L. Bailey,et al.  Family members' perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use. , 2006, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[29]  Melanie Fried-Oken,et al.  Feedback on AAC intervention from adults who are temporarily unable to speak , 1991 .

[30]  M. Hecht,et al.  The subjective experience of intimacy, passion, and commitment in heterosexual loving relationships , 1998 .

[31]  J. Devito Human Communication: The Basic Course , 1996 .

[32]  K. Yorkston,et al.  Communication in Context: A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis , 2001 .

[33]  B. Moss,et al.  Defining Intimacy in Romantic Relationships. , 1993 .

[34]  M. Patton Qualitative research & evaluation methods , 2002 .

[35]  Robert E. Owens,et al.  Language Development: An Introduction , 1984 .

[36]  D. Beukelman,et al.  Augmentative & Alternative Communication: Supporting Children & Adults With Complex Communication Needs , 2006 .

[37]  J. Ostroff,et al.  The interpersonal process model of intimacy: the role of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and partner responsiveness in interactions between breast cancer patients and their partners. , 2004, Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[38]  Susan Fager,et al.  AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: A review , 2007, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[39]  V. Minichiello In-depth Interviewing: Researching People , 1992 .

[40]  Noma B. Anderson,et al.  Human Communication Disorders: An Introduction , 1986 .