Factors associated with successful arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery.

OBJECTIVE To analyze the clinical and angiographic variables that affect the results of arteriovenous malformation (AVM) radiosurgery and to propose a new method of reporting patient outcomes after AVM radiosurgery. This method incorporates both the obliteration status of the AVMs and the postoperative neurological condition of the patient. METHODS Patient outcomes were defined as excellent (nidus obliteration and no new deficits), good (nidus obliteration with a new minor deficit), fair (nidus obliteration with a new major deficit), unchanged (incomplete nidus obliteration without a new deficit), poor (incomplete nidus obliteration with any new deficit), and dead. Two hundred twenty patients who underwent AVM radiosurgery at our center before 1992 were subjected to a multivariate analysis with patient outcomes as the dependent variable. RESULTS Multivariate analysis determined four factors associated with successful AVM radiosurgery: smaller AVM volume (P=0.003), number of draining veins (P=0.001), younger patient age (P=0.0003), and hemispheric AVM location (P=0.002). Preradiosurgical embolization was a negative predictor of successful AVM radiosurgery (P=0.02). CONCLUSION AVM obliteration without new neurological deficits can be achieved in at least 80% of patients with small volume, hemispheric AVMs after single-session AVM radiosurgery. Future studies on AVM radiosurgery should report patient outcomes in a fashion that incorporates all the factors involved in successful AVM radiosurgery.

[1]  R. Heros,et al.  Surgical excision of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: late results. , 1990, Neurosurgery.

[2]  L D Lunsford,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations of the brain. , 1991, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  L D Lunsford,et al.  A dose-response analysis of arteriovenous malformation obliteration after radiosurgery. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  M. Phillips,et al.  Stereotactic heavy-charged-particle Bragg-peak radiation for intracranial arteriovenous malformations. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  John R. Robinson,et al.  Patient outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery for "operable" arteriovenous malformations. , 1995 .

[6]  J. Flickinger,et al.  An integrated logistic formula for prediction of complications from radiosurgery. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  R F Spetzler,et al.  A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. , 1986, Journal of neurosurgery.

[8]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  Hemorrhage risk after stereotactic radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. , 1996, Neurosurgery.

[9]  M. Lawton,et al.  Multimodality treatment of deep arteriovenous malformations: thalamus, basal ganglia, and brain stem. , 1995, Neurosurgery.

[10]  William A. Friedman,et al.  Modifications based on computed tomographic imaging in planning the radiosurgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations. , 1993, Neurosurgery.

[11]  J. Adler,et al.  Clinical outcome of radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. , 1992, Journal of neurosurgery.

[12]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  The efficacy of particulate embolization combined with stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of large arteriovenous malformations of the brain. , 1995, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[13]  L D Lunsford,et al.  Factors that predict the bleeding risk of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. , 1996, Stroke.

[14]  F J Bova,et al.  Linear accelerator radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: the relationship of size to outcome. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  R. Spetzler,et al.  The prospective application of a grading system for arteriovenous malformations. , 1994, Neurosurgery.

[16]  D Lefkopoulos,et al.  Treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations by embolization and radiosurgery. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[17]  Linear accelerator radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: an update. , 1994, Neurosurgery.

[18]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery in children and adolescents. , 1990, Pediatric neurosurgery.

[19]  J. Buatti,et al.  The risk of hemorrhage after radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[20]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  Stereotactic magnetic resonance angiography for targeting in arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. , 1994, Neurosurgery.

[21]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations: factors associated with incomplete obliteration. , 1996, Neurosurgery.

[22]  E. Shaw,et al.  Interim report on the radiosurgical treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. The influence of size, dose, time, and technical factors on obliteration rate. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[23]  C. Lindquist,et al.  Effect of Gamma Knife surgery on the risk of rupture prior to AVM obliteration. , 1996, Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN.

[24]  A. Kurata,et al.  An analysis of the venous drainage system as a factor in hemorrhage from arteriovenous malformations. , 1992, Journal of neurosurgery.

[25]  J. Debus,et al.  The role of high-dose, single-fraction irradiation in small and large intracranial arteriovenous malformations. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  Complications from arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery: multivariate analysis and risk modeling. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  C Mistretta,et al.  Treatment of arteriovenous malformations with stereotactic radiosurgery employing both magnetic resonance angiography and standard angiography as a database. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  I. Lax,et al.  Prediction of complications in gamma knife radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformation. , 1996, Acta oncologica.