In Vitro Evaluation of Current Thoracic Aortic Stent-Grafts for Real-Time MR-Guided Placement

Purpose: To systematically evaluate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of current thoracic aortic stent-graft devices before, during, and after in vitro deployment as a step toward real-time MRI-guided stent placement. Methods: Six stent-graft devices used for thoracic aortic repair were examined in a dedicated phantom model using a 1.5-T MRI scanner. First, the delivery systems with the mounted stent-graft were examined using real-time fast imaging with steady-state precession (TrueFISP) with Cartesian and radial k-space filling. TrueFISP imaging was subsequently used for real-time monitoring of stent-graft expansion. The deployed stent-grafts were then examined in a water bath containing gadolinium (1:40) with high-resolution T1-weighted 3D fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequences. The images were analyzed for artifacts, radiofrequency caging effects, and device visualization quality. Results: Three delivery systems with mounted stent-grafts did not contain ferromagnetic elements and were well visualized. Imaging with radial k-space filling showed fewer artifacts than Cartesian imaging. Movement of the delivery system and stent-graft expansion of these devices were successfully demonstrated at a rate of up to 6 frames per second. Evaluation of the expanded stent-grafts revealed only minor susceptibility artifacts without relevant signal attenuation in the stent-graft lumen for 5 nitinol-based stent-grafts. Only a stainless steel—based stent-graft was associated with severe artifacts, thwarting visualization of its lumen or surroundings. Conclusion: The present study shows that 3 nitinol-based thoracic stent-graft devices are potentially suited for real-time MRI-guided placement with respect to both the delivery system and the stent-graft itself. These observations provide the basis for the evaluation of MRI-guided stent-graft placement in vivo.

[1]  Arno Buecker,et al.  Magnetic resonance-guided placement of aortic stents grafts: feasibility with real-time magnetic resonance fluoroscopy. , 2004, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[2]  M. Viergever,et al.  Suitability of 7 Aortic Stent-Graft Models for MRI-Based Surveillance , 2004, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[3]  C J Bakker,et al.  Heating Around Intravascular Guidewires by Resonating RF Waves , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  W. Nitz,et al.  Magnetic resonance monitoring of stent deployment: in vitro evaluation of different stent designs and stent delivery systems. , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[5]  Warren J Manning,et al.  Magnetic Resonance–Guided Coronary Artery Stent Placement in a Swine Model , 2002, Circulation.

[6]  S. Maderwald,et al.  Steady-state free precession sequences in myocardial first-pass perfusion MR imaging: comparison with TurboFLASH imaging , 2004, European Radiology.

[7]  G Kretschmer,et al.  Evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm for stent-graft placement: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus helical CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography. , 1997, Radiology.

[8]  R. Fattori,et al.  Descending thoracic aortic diseases: stent-graft repair. , 2003, Radiology.

[9]  H H Quick,et al.  Interventional MRA and intravascular imaging , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  A. Schmermund,et al.  Endovascular stent-graft treatment of aortic dissection: determinants of post-interventional outcome , 2005 .

[11]  W. Nitz,et al.  On the heating of linear conductive structures as guide wires and catheters in interventional MRI , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  Tobias Schaeffter,et al.  Magnetic Resonance–Guided Placement of Atrial Septal Closure Device in Animal Model of Patent Foramen Ovale , 2002, Circulation.

[13]  Michael Bock,et al.  Renal Embolization: Feasibility of Magnetic Resonance-Guidance Using Active Catheter Tracking and Intraarterial Magnetic Resonance Angiography , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[14]  H H Quick,et al.  Plain and covered stent-grafts: in vitro evaluation of characteristics at three-dimensional MR angiography. , 1999, Radiology.

[15]  Carmen Ayuso,et al.  MRA is useful as a follow‐up technique after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms with nitinol endoprostheses , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  Martin R Prince,et al.  Blood pool MR angiography of aortic stent-graft endoleak. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Mark E Ladd,et al.  Interventional MRA using actively visualized catheters, TrueFISP, and real‐time image fusion , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  H. Quick,et al.  In vitro image characteristics of an abdominal aortic stent graft: CTA versus 3D MRA , 2007, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[19]  A. Persson,et al.  Measurements before endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: MR imaging with MRA vs. angiography and CT , 2003 .

[20]  Michael O Zenge,et al.  Interventional magnetic resonance angiography with no strings attached: Wireless active catheter visualization , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  M. Ladd,et al.  Reduction of resonant RF heating in intravascular catheters using coaxial chokes , 2000, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[22]  Tobias Schaeffter,et al.  Simultaneous real‐time visualization of the catheter tip and vascular anatomy for MR‐guided PTA of iliac arteries in an animal model , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.