Revisiting Neil Armstrongs Moon-Landing Quote: Implications for Speech Perception, Function Word Reduction, and Acoustic Ambiguity
暂无分享,去创建一个
Mark A. Pitt | Laura C. Dilley | Stephanie Schmidt | Tuuli H. Morrill | Melissa M. Baese-Berk | M. Pitt | L. Dilley | M. Baese-Berk | Stephanie Schmidt | M. Pitt
[1] Paul Boersma,et al. Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .
[2] Laura C. Dilley,et al. Long-Term Temporal Tracking of Speech Rate Affects Spoken-Word Recognition , 2014, Psychological science.
[3] Laura C. Dilley,et al. Altering Context Speech Rate Can Cause Words to Appear or Disappear , 2010, Psychological science.
[4] Benjamin V. Tucker,et al. Cues to perception of reduced flaps. , 2009, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] Mark A. Pitt,et al. When cues combine: How distal and proximal acoustic cues are integrated in word segmentation , 2013 .
[6] Paul Boersma,et al. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .
[7] R. Cole,et al. Perception and production of fluent speech , 2016 .
[8] Linda Shockey,et al. Sound Patterns of Spoken English , 2003 .
[9] I. Lehiste. The Timing of Utterances and Linguistic Boundaries , 1972 .
[10] Laurence White,et al. Effects of syntactic expectations on speech segmentation. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[11] J. Devin McAuley,et al. Distal rhythm influences whether or not listeners hear a word in continuous speech: Support for a perceptual grouping hypothesis , 2014, Cognition.
[12] R. Schreuder,et al. The Recognition of Reduced Word Forms , 2002, Brain and Language.
[13] Dan Jurafsky,et al. Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] Mirjam Ernestus,et al. Acoustic reduction and the roles of abstractions and exemplars in speech processing , 2014 .
[15] D. Barr,et al. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.
[16] Kiyoko Yoneyama,et al. How we hear what is hardly there: Mechanisms underlying compensation for /t/-reduction in speech comprehension , 2008 .
[17] D. Collingridge. A Primer on Quantitized Data Analysis and Permutation Testing , 2013 .
[18] Interactions between distal speech rate, linguistic knowledge, and speech environment , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[19] Arthur S. Abramson,et al. Voice Timing: Cross‐Language Experiments in Identification and Discrimination , 1968 .
[20] Keith Johnson. Massive reduction in conversational American English , 2004 .
[21] Mirjam Ernestus,et al. An introduction to reduced pronunciation variants [Editorial] , 2011 .
[22] Laura C. Dilley,et al. New tests of the distal speech rate effect: examining cross-linguistic generalization , 2013, Front. Psychol..
[23] Laura C. Dilley,et al. Potent prosody: Comparing the effects of distal prosody, proximal prosody, and semantic context on word segmentation☆ , 2010 .
[24] Coarticulation • Suprasegmentals,et al. Acoustic Phonetics , 2019, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders.