论文信息 - Publication Bias against Null Results

Publication Bias against Null Results

Studies suggest a bias against the publication of null (p >.05) results. Instead of significance, we advocate reporting effect sizes and confidence intervals, and using replication studies. If statistical tests are used, power tests should accompany them.

J. Scott Armstrong | Raymond Hubbard | J. Armstrong | R. Hubbard

[1] Jacob Cohen. The earth is round (p < .05) , 1994 .

[2] D. Bakan,et al. The test of significance in psychological research. , 1966, Psychological bulletin.

[3] J. Scott Armstrong,et al. Are null results becoming an endangered species in marketing? , 1992 .

[4] R. Lindsay,et al. Publication System Biases Associated with the Statistical Testing Paradigm , 1994 .

[5] J. Armstrong,et al. Replications and Extensions in Marketing - Rarely Published But Quite Contrary , 1994 .

[6] Raymond Hubbard,et al. An empirical comparison of published replication research in accounting, economics, finance, management, and marketing , 1996 .

[7] Theodor D. Sterling,et al. Publication decisions revisited: the effect of the outcome of statistical tests on the decision to p , 1995 .

[8] A. Greenwald. Consequences of Prejudice Against the Null Hypothesis , 1975 .

[9] Jacob Cohen. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[10] F. D. Wilson,et al. The Replication Problem in Sociology: A Report and a Suggestion* , 1973 .