An Approach to Automatically Label & Order Brain Activity/Component Maps

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a brain imaging technique which provides detailed in-sights into brain function and its disruption in various brain disorders. fMRI data can be analyzed using data-driven or region-of-interest based methods. The data-driven analysis of brain activity maps involves several steps, the first of which is identifying whether the maps capture what might be interpreted as intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) or artifacts. This is followed by linking the ICNs to known anatomical and/or functional parcellations. Optionally, as in the study of functional network connectivity (FNC), rearranging the connectivity graph is also necessary for systematic interpretation. Here we present a toolbox that automates all these processes under minimal or no supervision with high accuracy. We provide a pretrained cross-validated elastic-net regularized general linear model for the noisecloud toolbox to separate the ICNs from artifacts. We include several well-known anatomical and functional parcellations from which researchers can choose to label the activity maps. Finally, we integrate a method for maximizing the within-domain modularity to generate a more systematically structured FNC matrix. We improve upon and integrate existing techniques and new methods to design this toolbox which can take care of all the above needs. Specifically, we show that our pretrained model achieves 89% accuracy and 100% precision at classifying ICNs from artifacts in a validation dataset. Researchers are generating brain imaging data and analyzing brain activity at an ever-increasing rate. The Autolabeller toolbox can help automate such analyses for faster and reproducible research.

[1]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  An ICA-based method for the identification of optimal FMRI features and components using combined group-discriminative techniques , 2009, NeuroImage.

[2]  Walter J Koroshetz,et al.  The NIH BRAIN Initiative: Advancing neurotechnologies, integrating disciplines , 2018, PLoS biology.

[3]  J. Pekar,et al.  A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[4]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution , 1995, Neural Computation.

[5]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A method for functional network connectivity among spatially independent resting-state components in schizophrenia , 2008, NeuroImage.

[6]  Zhishun Wang,et al.  Visual inspection of independent components: Defining a procedure for artifact removal from fMRI data , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[8]  César Caballero-Gaudes,et al.  Methods for cleaning the BOLD fMRI signal , 2016, NeuroImage.

[9]  S Makeig,et al.  Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[10]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[11]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Alberto Llera,et al.  ICA-AROMA: A robust ICA-based strategy for removing motion artifacts from fMRI data , 2015, NeuroImage.

[13]  Rex E. Jung,et al.  Multimodal Neuroimaging in Schizophrenia: Description and Dissemination , 2017, Neuroinformatics.

[14]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Resting-state fMRI confounds and cleanup , 2013, NeuroImage.

[15]  G H Glover,et al.  Image‐based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[17]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Identifying FMRI dynamic connectivity states using affinity propagation clustering method: Application to schizophrenia , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping , 2013 .

[19]  Steen Moeller,et al.  ICA-based artefact removal and accelerated fMRI acquisition for improved resting state network imaging , 2014, NeuroImage.

[20]  Edmund T. Rolls,et al.  Implementation of a new parcellation of the orbitofrontal cortex in the automated anatomical labeling atlas , 2015, NeuroImage.

[21]  Ludovica Griffanti,et al.  Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: Combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers , 2014, NeuroImage.

[22]  Jianfeng Feng,et al.  Automated anatomical labelling atlas 3 , 2020, NeuroImage.

[23]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  Automatic independent component labeling for artifact removal in fMRI , 2008, NeuroImage.

[24]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Multisubject Independent Component Analysis of fMRI: A Decade of Intrinsic Networks, Default Mode, and Neurodiagnostic Discovery , 2012, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Ten Key Observations on the Analysis of Resting-state Functional MR Imaging Data Using Independent Component Analysis. , 2017, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[27]  Jean-Francois Mangin,et al.  What is the best similarity measure for motion correction in fMRI time series? , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  T. Insel,et al.  The NIH BRAIN Initiative , 2013, Science.

[29]  M. V. D. Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity , 2010, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[30]  A. Belger,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity analysis reveals transient states of dysconnectivity in schizophrenia , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[31]  Hao He,et al.  Artifact removal in the context of group ICA: A comparison of single‐subject and group approaches , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[32]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Generation and Evaluation of a Cortical Area Parcellation from Resting-State Correlations. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Won Hee Lee,et al.  Evaluation of the spatial variability in the major resting‐state networks across human brain functional atlases , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[35]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  Reducing interscanner variability of activation in a multicenter fMRI study: Controlling for signal-to-fluctuation-noise-ratio (SFNR) differences , 2006, NeuroImage.

[36]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[37]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  V. Calhoun,et al.  A Robust Classifier to Distinguish Noise from fMRI Independent Components , 2014, PloS one.

[39]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  Michele T. Diaz,et al.  The Function Biomedical Informatics Research Network Data Repository , 2016, NeuroImage.

[41]  Christopher L. Asplund,et al.  The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  Marc Joliot,et al.  Brain activity at rest: a multiscale hierarchical functional organization. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.