Waveform inversion using ABIC for the rupture process of the 1983 Hindu Kush earthquake

Abstract An inversion method was developed to infer earthquake rupture process from far-field velocity waveforms. We devise a source model that has variable slip and variable rupture velocity. The fault plane is divided into many subfaults. Slip amplitude is assumed to be dependent on the subfaults, and slip velocity at a point is assumed to be a triangle function of time. Rupture time is expressed by an interpolation equation using the rupture times at the corners of the subfaults. The slip distribution and the rupture-front motion are estimated by constrained least-squares inversion. We incorporate smoothing constraints on slip distribution and on rupture propagation into the observed data. The degree of the constraints is controlled by hyperparameters. The optimal values of the hyperparameters are determined by minimizing Akaike's Bayesian information criterion (ABIC). Under the assumption of ABIC, we can obtain a unique solution with reasonable resolution. We apply this inversion method to the Hindu Kush earthquake of 30 December 1983 with a depth of 212 km. We found that the rupture process of this earthquake was composed of two subevents. The first subevent occurs near the initiation point of the rupture. The centre of the second subevent region is approximately 20 km to the west of the first subevent. The released moment of the second subevent is about seven times larger than that of the first subevent.

[1]  K. Satake Inversion of tsunami waveforms for the estimation of heterogeneous fault motion of large submarine earthquakes: The 1968 Tokachi‐oki and 1983 Japan Sea earthquakes , 1989 .

[2]  K. Shimazaki,et al.  Inversion of intermediate‐period Rayleigh waves for source characteristics of the 1968 Tokachi‐Oki earthquake , 1985 .

[3]  赤池 弘次,et al.  BAYSEA, a bayesian seasonal adjustment program , 1980 .

[4]  Masayuki Kikuchi,et al.  Iterative deconvolution of complex body waves from great earthquakes-the Tokachi-Oki earthquake of 1968 , 1985 .

[5]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  RUPTURE HISTORY OF THE 1984 MORGAN HILL, CALIFORNIA, EARTHQUAKE FROM THE INVERSION OF STRONG MOTION RECORDS , 1986 .

[6]  Hirotugu Akaike,et al.  Likelihood and the Bayes procedure , 1980 .

[7]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  Inversion of strong ground motion and teleseismic waveform data for the fault rupture history of the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake , 1983 .

[8]  Gregory C. Beroza,et al.  Linearized inversion for fault rupture behavior: Application to the 1984 Morgan Hill, California, earthquake , 1988 .

[9]  Masayuki Kikuchi,et al.  Inversion of complex body waves-II , 1986 .

[10]  M. Takeo,et al.  Inversion of strong motion seismograms for the source process of the Naganoken-Seibu earthquake of 1984 , 1987 .

[11]  A. Dziewoński,et al.  Centroid-moment tensor solutions for October–December, 1983 , 1984 .

[12]  H. Akaike Prediction and Entropy , 1985 .

[13]  Yosihiko Ogata,et al.  Likelihood analysis of spatial inhomogeneity for marked point patterns , 1988 .

[14]  Allen H. Olson,et al.  Finite faults and inverse theory with applications to the 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake , 1982 .

[15]  A method of waveform inversion for earthquake rupture process , 1986 .

[16]  S. Yoshida Waveform inversion for rupture processes of two deep earthquakes in the Izu-Bonin region , 1988 .

[17]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Preliminary reference earth model , 1981 .

[18]  G. Mellman,et al.  Inversion of the body waves from the Borrego Mountain earthquake to the source mechanism , 1976, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.