Image Quality And Observer Performance

The majority of images produced by optical and electro-optical equipment are destined to be viewed eventually by human observers. The human sense of sight itself exhibits a variety of imperfections of imagery (due to the dioptrics), internal noise (due to discrete image sampling at the retina) and a variety of image transformations in the neural networks preceding the perceptual levels of the cortex. In addition all these characteristics are progressive functions of retinal image position, whilst perceptual processes themselves are subject to both statistical fluctuations and influence from other factors. There are therefore many facets of imagery which interact with the human sense of sight, the importance of the individual interactions being largely dependent on the application to which the presented images are put. An approximate representation of preperceptual image formation and transformation by human vision will be presented. A unified approach to the modelling of visual performance will then be summarised which takes account of the various display/observer interface factors and attempts to allow for variability in perceptual processes. Finally it will be shown how apparently widely disparate approaches to visual performance modelling may be reconciled in terms of this unified approach.

[1]  J. Kulikowski,et al.  Spatial arrangement of line, edge and grating detectors revealed by subthreshold summation. , 1973, Vision research.

[2]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  H. Lavin,et al.  The OTF In Electro-Optical Imaging Systems , 1974, Other Conferences.

[4]  F. Campbell,et al.  The effect of chromatic aberration on visual acuity , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  J M Enoch,et al.  Optical modulation by the isolated human fovea. , 1972, Vision research.

[6]  S M Anstis,et al.  Letter: A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. , 1974, Vision research.

[7]  B. Boycott,et al.  Organization of the primate retina: electron microscopy , 1966, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[8]  P. Gouras,et al.  Functional properties of ganglion cells of the rhesus monkey retina. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  G. Bahr INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE SPHERICAL AND CHROMATIC ABERRATIONS OF THE EYE, AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON ITS REFRACTION , 1945 .

[10]  F. Campbell,et al.  Optical quality of the human eye , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  D. Hubel,et al.  Plasticity of ocular dominance columns in monkey striate cortex. , 1977, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[12]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  H. Kolb,et al.  Organization of the outer plexiform layer of the primate retina: electron microscopy of Golgi-impregnated cells. , 1970, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[14]  D. A. Owens A comparison of accommodative responsiveness and contrast sensitivity for sinusoidal gratings , 1980, Vision Research.

[15]  F. Toates,et al.  Accommodation function of the human eye. , 1972, Physiological reviews.

[16]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  J W GEBHARD,et al.  Pupil size as determined by adapting luminance. , 1952, Journal of the Optical Society of America.