Principles of epidemiological modelling.

Epidemiological modelling can be a powerful tool to assist animal health policy development and disease prevention and control. Models can vary from simple deterministic mathematical models through to complex spatially-explicit stochastic simulations and decision support systems. The approach used will vary depending on the purpose of the study, how well the epidemiology of a disease is understood, the amount and quality of data available, and the background and experience of the modellers. Epidemiological models can be classified into various categories depending on their treatment of variability, chance and uncertainty (deterministic or stochastic), time (continuous or discrete intervals), space (non-spatial or spatial) and the structure of the population (homogenous or heterogeneous mixing). The increasing sophistication of computers, together with greater recognition of the importance of spatial elements in the spread and control of disease, mean that models which incorporate spatial components are becoming more important in epidemiological studies. Multidisciplinary approaches using a range of new technologies make it possible to build more sophisticated models of animal disease. New generation epidemiological models enable disease to be studied in the context of physical, economic, technological, health, media and political infrastructures. To be useful in policy development, models must be fit for purpose and appropriately verified and validated. This involves ensuring that the model is an adequate representation of the system under study and that its outputs are sufficiently accurate and precise for the intended purpose. Finally, models are just one tool for providing technical advice, and should not be considered in isolation from data from experimental and field studies.

[1]  Liliana Perez,et al.  An agent-based approach for modeling dynamics of contagious disease spread , 2009, International journal of health geographics.

[2]  David L. Pearl,et al.  Veterinary Epidemiology, 3rd ed. , 2006 .

[3]  P. E. Kopp,et al.  Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence , 2005, Nature.

[4]  A. Hill,et al.  The North American Animal Disease Spread Model: a simulation model to assist decision making in evaluating animal disease incursions. , 2007, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[5]  Mark Stevenson,et al.  THE USE OF EPIDEMIOLOGICAL MODELS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ANIMAL DISEASES , 2007 .

[6]  R. Kitching,et al.  Use and abuse of mathematical models: an illustration from the 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic in the United Kingdom. , 2006, Revue scientifique et technique.

[7]  C Dubé,et al.  Comparing network analysis measures to determine potential epidemic size of highly contagious exotic diseases in fragmented monthly networks of dairy cattle movements in Ontario, Canada. , 2008, Transboundary and emerging diseases.

[8]  C. Munoz-Zanzi,et al.  Evaluation of Surveillance Protocols for Detecting Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Infection in Boar Studs by Simulation Modeling , 2007, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[9]  R L Sanson,et al.  A comparison of predictions made by three simulation models of foot-and-mouth disease , 2007, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[10]  A. A. Dijkhuizen,et al.  A state-transition model to stimulate the economics of bovine virus diarrhoea control , 1994 .

[11]  D. Pfeiffer,et al.  Should we use models to inform policy development? , 2006, Veterinary journal.

[12]  Robert G. Sargent,et al.  Verification, validation and accreditation of simulation models , 2000, 2000 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37165).

[13]  J. C. Helton,et al.  An Investigation of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Computer Models , 1988 .

[14]  J. Karns,et al.  A mathematical model of the dynamics of Salmonella Cerro infection in a US dairy herd , 2007, Epidemiology and Infection.

[15]  N M Ferguson,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity and the persistence of infectious diseases. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  B K Szymanski,et al.  Host spatial heterogeneity and the spread of vector-borne infection. , 2001, Theoretical population biology.

[17]  D. Rogers,et al.  Prediction of areas around the Mediterranean at risk of bluetongue by modelling the distribution of its vector using satellite imaging , 2001, Veterinary Record.

[18]  C. Viboud,et al.  Modeling spatial and temporal transmission of foot-and-mouth disease in France: identification of high-risk areas. , 2005, Veterinary research.

[19]  M. Keeling.  Models of foot-and-mouth disease , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Michael J. North,et al.  AGENT-BASED MODELING AND SIMULATION: DESKTOP ABMS , 2007 .

[21]  G. Medley,et al.  Mathematical modelling of the foot and mouth disease epidemic of 2001: strengths and weaknesses. , 2002, Research in veterinary science.

[22]  R. May,et al.  Dimensions of superspreading , 2005, Nature.

[23]  H. Scott Hurd,et al.  The application of simulation models and systems analysis in epidemiology: a review , 1993 .

[24]  M A P M van Asseldonk,et al.  Stochastic efficiency analysis of bovine tuberculosis-surveillance programs in the Netherlands. , 2005, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[25]  Alex James,et al.  An event-based model of superspreading in epidemics , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  An evaluation of alternate control strategies for foot-and-mouth disease in Australia: a regional approach , 1995 .

[27]  R S Morris,et al.  Simulation analyses to evaluate alternative control strategies for the 2002 foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in the Republic of Korea. , 2006, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[28]  Rob Deardon,et al.  Optimal reactive vaccination strategies for a foot-and-mouth outbreak in the UK , 2006, Nature.

[29]  Michael P Ward,et al.  Simulation model of within-herd transmission of bovine tuberculosis in Argentine dairy herds. , 2002, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[30]  M. G. Garner,et al.  Evaluating alternative approaches to managing animal disease outbreaks--the role of modelling in policy formulation. , 2007, Veterinaria italiana.

[31]  Mark C Thurmond,et al.  Results of epidemic simulation modeling to evaluate strategies to control an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease. , 2003, American journal of veterinary research.

[32]  Robert G. Sargent,et al.  Verification and validation of simulation models , 2013, Proceedings of Winter Simulation Conference.

[33]  B. Grenfell,et al.  Population biology of pseudorabies in swine. , 1990, American journal of veterinary research.

[34]  M. Thrusfield,et al.  Destructive tension: mathematics versus experience--the progress and control of the 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain. , 2011, Revue scientifique et technique.

[35]  Nick Taylor,et al.  Review of the use of models in informing disease control policy development and adjustment. , 2003 .

[36]  M. G. Garner,et al.  Modelling the spread of foot-and-mouth disease in Australia. , 2005, Australian veterinary journal.

[37]  L. Meyers,et al.  When individual behaviour matters: homogeneous and network models in epidemiology , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[38]  C. Webb,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of surveillance strategies for scrapie in Norwegian sheep. , 2003, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[39]  M. Nielen,et al.  Development of the Dutch Johne's disease control program supported by a simulation model. , 2003, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[40]  B. Nerlich.  Media, Metaphors and Modelling , 2007 .

[41]  A. W. Jalvingh,et al.  Spatial and stochastic simulation to compare two emergency-vaccination strategies with a marker vaccine in the 1997/1998 Dutch Classical Swine Fever epidemic. , 2001, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[42]  H Christopher Frey,et al.  OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS , 2001 .