The establishment of formal research groups in higher education institutions

This article explores the significance for academic staff members of research groups established and formalised as part of research strategies at university faculties. It also explores the levels of participation and stresses the importance of such group-related activities with regard to the level of participation, perceived impact on research quality and researcher training. The study is based on data from a survey and in-depth interviews with academic staff at Norwegian universities as well as document reviews. It provides evidence that formalised research groups can have a positive effect on the quality of individual research as well as researcher training. The study reveals significant differences between fields of science with regard to the importance of such groups for research activities and quality. Nevertheless, it finds that they contribute to more institution-based research, and also in subjects and qualifications where the research has primarily been conducted on an individual basis, such as in the humanities. These groups cannot simply be understood as a legitimating device for scientific communities due to changing funding and steering criteria; rather they manifest themselves as modes of academic work serving as a supplement to, rather than substitute for, other forms of cooperation.

[1]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Critical Mass and Pedagogic Continuity: studies in academic habitus , 1997 .

[2]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[3]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 2001 .

[4]  Karen Seashore Louis,et al.  Becoming a Scientist: The Effects of Work-Group Size and Organizational Climate , 2007 .

[5]  Sven Hemlin,et al.  Creative knowledge environments for research groups in biotechnology. The influence of leadership and organizational support in universities and business companies , 2006, Scientometrics.

[6]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[7]  R. Johnston.  Effects of resource concentration on research performance , 1994 .

[8]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[9]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Scientific Productivity: The Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries , 2009 .

[10]  H. Etzkowitz.  Individual investigators and their research groups , 1992 .

[11]  J. Lutjeharms,et al.  Scientific productivity. , 1981, Science.

[12]  Antonella Carassa,et al.  Participation as a Form of Socialisation: How a Research Team can Support PhD Students in their Academic Path , 2014 .

[13]  T. Bonavía-Martín,et al.  Dimensions of scientific collaboration and its contribution to the academic research groups§ scientific quality , 2009 .

[14]  Ralph Kenna,et al.  Critical Masses for Academic Research Groups and Consequences for Higher Education Research Policy and Management. , 2012 .

[15]  Oili-Helena Ylijoki,et al.  Entangled in academic capitalism? A case-study on changing ideals and practices of university research , 2003 .

[16]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[17]  Alexander von Eye,et al.  How does scientific success relate to individual and organizational characteristics? A scientometric study of psychology researchers in the German-speaking countries , 2012, Scientometrics.

[18]  Amanda H. Goodall.  Highly Cited Leaders and the Performance of Research Universities. , 2008 .

[19]  P. S. Nagpaul,et al.  Effect of professional competence, managerial role and status of group leaders to R&D performance , 1989, Scientometrics.

[20]  Åse Gornitzka,et al.  Governmental policies and organisational change in higher education , 1999 .

[21]  Fiona Edgar,et al.  Factors influencing university research performance , 2013 .

[22]  Amanda H. Goodall.  Should top universities be led by top researchers and are they?: A citations analysis , 2005, J. Documentation.

[23]  Lars Geschwind.  Getting Pole Position: Research strategies in the Humanities at Swedish universities , 2010 .

[24]  S. Wheelan,et al.  Group Size, Group Development, and Group Productivity , 2009 .

[25]  Ernesto de los Reyes López,et al.  Dimensions of scientific collaboration and its contribution to the academic research groups' scientific quality , 2009 .

[26]  Maarja Beerkens,et al.  Facts and fads in academic research management: The effect of management practices on research productivity in Australia , 2013 .

[27]  Gigliola Mathisen Nyhagen,et al.  New organisational structures and the transformation of academic work , 2013 .

[28]  Hugo Horta,et al.  How does size matter for science? Exploring the effects of research unit size on academics scientific productivity and information exchange behaviors , 2011 .