Advances in Quantitative Trait Analysis in Yeast

Understanding the genetic mechanisms underlying complex traits is one of the next frontiers in biology. The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has become an important model for elucidating the mechanisms that govern natural genetic and phenotypic variation. This success is partially due to its intrinsic biological features, such as the short sexual generation time, high meiotic recombination rate, and small genome size. Precise reverse genetics technologies allow the high throughput manipulation of genetic information with exquisite precision, offering the unique opportunity to experimentally measure the phenotypic effect of genetic variants. Population genomic and phenomic studies have revealed widespread variation between diverged populations, characteristic of man-made environments, as well as geographic clusters of wild strains along with naturally occurring recombinant strains (mosaics). Here, we review these recent studies and provide a perspective on how these previously unappreciated levels of variation can help to bridge our understanding of the genotype-phenotype gap, keeping budding yeast at the forefront of genetic studies. Not only are quantitative trait loci (QTL) being mapped with high resolution down to the nucleotide, for the first time QTLs of modest effect and complex interactions between these QTLs and between QTLs and the environment are being determined experimentally at unprecedented levels using next generation techniques of deep sequencing selected pools of individuals as well as multi-generational crosses.

[1]  Alan M. Moses,et al.  Revealing the genetic structure of a trait by sequencing a population under selection. , 2011, Genome research.

[2]  Ron Shamir,et al.  Different sets of QTLs influence fitness variation in yeast , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[3]  Christian Brion,et al.  Deciphering the Molecular Basis of Wine Yeast Fermentation Traits Using a Combined Genetic and Genomic Approach , 2011, G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics.

[4]  L. Steinmetz,et al.  Dissecting the Genetic Basis of Resistance to Malaria Parasites in Anopheles gambiae , 2009, Science.

[5]  J. François,et al.  Cell-to-Cell Stochastic Variation in Gene Expression Is a Complex Genetic Trait , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[6]  Judy H. Cho,et al.  Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases , 2009, Nature.

[7]  Robert P. Davey,et al.  Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts , 2008, Nature.

[8]  M. Aigle,et al.  Single QTL mapping and nucleotide-level resolution of a physiologic trait in wine Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. , 2007, FEMS yeast research.

[9]  B. Cohen,et al.  Genetic Interactions Between Transcription Factors Cause Natural Variation in Yeast , 2009, Science.

[10]  F. Winston,et al.  Amplification of histone genes by circular chromosome formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Nature.

[11]  P. Gonçalves,et al.  Natural Populations of Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in Portugal Are Associated with Oak Bark and Are Sympatric with S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus , 2008, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[12]  Leonid Kruglyak,et al.  Identification and Dissection of a Complex DNA Repair Sensitivity Phenotype in Baker's Yeast , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[13]  Leonid Kruglyak,et al.  Dissection of genetically complex traits with extremely large pools of yeast segregants , 2010, Nature.

[14]  Daniel R. Richards,et al.  Dissecting the architecture of a quantitative trait locus in yeast , 2002, Nature.

[15]  L. Kruglyak,et al.  Genetic Dissection of Transcriptional Regulation in Budding Yeast , 2002, Science.

[16]  Leopold Parts,et al.  Assessing the complex architecture of polygenic traits in diverged yeast populations , 2011, Molecular ecology.

[17]  Francisco A. Cubillos,et al.  Segregating YKU80 and TLC1 Alleles Underlying Natural Variation in Telomere Properties in Wild Yeast , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[18]  J. A. Barnett.  A history of research on yeasts 10: foundations of yeast genetics1 , 2007, Yeast.

[19]  L. Kruglyak,et al.  Genetic Architecture of Highly Complex Chemical Resistance Traits across Four Yeast Strains , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[20]  Thomas Mitchell-Olds,et al.  Epistasis and balanced polymorphism influencing complex trait variation , 2005, Nature.

[21]  R. Kreisberg,et al.  Environment-responsive transcription factors bind subtelomeric elements and regulate gene silencing , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[22]  D. Bolon,et al.  Experimental illumination of a fitness landscape , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Camilo Salazar,et al.  Chromosomal rearrangements maintain a polymorphic supergene controlling butterfly mimicry , 2011, Nature.

[24]  Aaron M. Tarone,et al.  Population-Based Resequencing of Experimentally Evolved Populations Reveals the Genetic Basis of Body Size Variation in Drosophila melanogaster , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[25]  Amin Zia,et al.  Ranking insertion, deletion and nonsense mutations based on their effect on genetic information , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[26]  Rachel B. Brem,et al.  Trans-acting regulatory variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the role of transcription factors , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[27]  L. Kruglyak,et al.  Widespread Genetic Incompatibility in C. Elegans Maintained by Balancing Selection , 2008, Science.

[28]  Lieven Clement,et al.  Identification of novel causative genes determining the complex trait of high ethanol tolerance in yeast using pooled-segregant whole-genome sequence analysis , 2012, Genome research.

[29]  Jean-Marie Cornuet,et al.  Bread, beer and wine: Saccharomyces cerevisiae diversity reflects human history , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[30]  Justin C. Fay,et al.  Evidence for Domesticated and Wild Populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2005, PLoS genetics.

[31]  Justin O Borevitz,et al.  Genome-wide association studies in plants: the missing heritability is in the field , 2011, Genome Biology.

[32]  Ben Lehner,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of epistasis within and between genes. , 2011, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[33]  Justin C. Fay,et al.  Genetic variation in the cysteine biosynthesis pathway causes sensitivity to pharmacological compounds , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  P. Sniegowski,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus coexist in a natural woodland site in North America and display different levels of reproductive isolation from European conspecifics. , 2002, FEMS yeast research.

[35]  Himanshu Sinha,et al.  Complex Genetic Interactions in a Quantitative Trait Locus , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[36]  Conrad A. Nieduszynski,et al.  From sequence to function: Insights from natural variation in budding yeasts☆ , 2011, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[37]  Joshua A. Granek,et al.  Environmental and Genetic Determinants of Colony Morphology in Yeast , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[38]  W. Timberlake,et al.  A new yeast genetic resource for analysis and breeding , 2011, Yeast.

[39]  E. Stone,et al.  The genetics of quantitative traits: challenges and prospects , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[40]  Christopher J. R. Illingworth,et al.  Quantifying Selection Acting on a Complex Trait Using Allele Frequency Time Series Data , 2011, Molecular biology and evolution.

[41]  Jun-Yi Leu,et al.  High-Resolution Mutation Mapping Reveals Parallel Experimental Evolution in Yeast , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[42]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Quantitative trait loci mapped to single-nucleotide resolution in yeast , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[43]  Himanshu Sinha,et al.  Sequential Elimination of Major-Effect Contributors Identifies Additional Quantitative Trait Loci Conditioning High-Temperature Growth in Yeast , 2008, Genetics.

[44]  Gavin Sherlock,et al.  Bulk Segregant Analysis by High-Throughput Sequencing Reveals a Novel Xylose Utilization Gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[45]  Yoshikazu Ohya,et al.  Genetic Complexity and Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping of Yeast Morphological Traits , 2007, PLoS genetics.

[46]  Robin D Dowell,et al.  Genotype to Phenotype: A Complex Problem , 2010, Science.

[47]  Joel S. Bader,et al.  Synthetic chromosome arms function in yeast and generate phenotypic diversity by design , 2011, Nature.

[48]  Paul M. Magwene,et al.  Outcrossing, mitotic recombination, and life-history trade-offs shape genome evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Leonid Kruglyak,et al.  Comprehensive polymorphism survey elucidates population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2009, Nature.

[50]  L. David,et al.  Four Linked Genes Participate in Controlling Sporulation Efficiency in Budding Yeast , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[51]  L. Steinmetz,et al.  Natural Single-Nucleosome Epi-Polymorphisms in Yeast , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[52]  Susan Lindquist,et al.  Hsp90 and Environmental Stress Transform the Adaptive Value of Natural Genetic Variation , 2010, Science.

[53]  Rob Jelier,et al.  Predicting phenotypic variation in yeast from individual genome sequences , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[54]  Anders Blomberg,et al.  Trait Variation in Yeast Is Defined by Population History , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[55]  Francisco A. Cubillos,et al.  Life history shapes trait heredity by accumulation of loss-of-function alleles in yeast. , 2012, Molecular biology and evolution.