SemaSun: Visualization of Semantic Knowledge based on an improved Sunburst Visualization Metaphor

Ontologies have become an established data model for conceptualizing knowledge entities and describing semantic relationships between them. They are used to model the concepts of specific domains and are widespread in the areas of the semantic web, digital libraries and multimedia database management. To gain the most possible benefit from this data model, it is important to offer adequate visualizations, so that users can easily acquire the knowledge. Most ontology visualization techniques are based on hierarchical or graph-based visualization metaphors. This may result in information-loss, visual clutter, cognitive overload or context-loss. In this paper we describe a new approach of ontology visualization technique called SemaSun that is based on the sunburst visualization metaphor. We improved this metaphor, which is naturally designed for displaying hierarchical data, to the tasks of displaying multiple inheritance and semantic relations. This approach also offers incremental ontology exploring to reduce the cognitive load without losing the informational context.

[1]  Jarke J. van Wijk,et al.  Beamtrees: compact visualization of large hierarchies , 2002, Inf. Vis..

[2]  Neil A. Ernst,et al.  Jambalaya: Interactive visualization to enhance ontology authoring and knowledge acquisition in Protégé , 2001 .

[3]  Mick Kerrigan WSMOViz: An Ontology Visualization Approach for WSMO , 2006, Tenth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'06).

[4]  Nadeem Bhatti Web Based Semantic Visualization to Explore Knowledge Spaces – An Approach for Learning by Exploring , 2008 .

[5]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[6]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Visualization and analysis of microarray and gene ontology data with treemaps , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[7]  Nadeem Bhatti,et al.  Semantic Visualization to Support Knowledge Discovery in Multi-Relational Service Communities , 2009 .

[8]  T. Elena,et al.  A Comparative Study of Four Ontology Visualization Techniques in Protege: Experiment Setup and Preliminary Results , 2006 .

[9]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[10]  R. Studer,et al.  Semantic Web Technologies: Trends and Research in Ontology-based Systems , 2006 .

[11]  Kawa Nazemi,et al.  SeMap: A Concept for the Visualization of Semantics as Maps , 2009, HCI.

[12]  Renate Motschnig,et al.  Knoocks: New Visualization Approach for Ontologies , 2008, 2008 12th International Conference Information Visualisation.

[13]  Alessio Bosca,et al.  OntoSphere: more than a 3D ontology visualization tool , 2005, SWAP.

[14]  Peter W. Eklund,et al.  OntoRama: Browsing RDF ontologies using a hyperbolic-style browser , 2002, First International Symposium on Cyber Worlds, 2002. Proceedings..

[15]  Catherine Plaisant,et al.  SpaceTree: supporting exploration in large node link tree, design evolution and empirical evaluation , 2002, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2002. INFOVIS 2002..

[16]  Thorsten Liebig,et al.  OntoTrack: Combining Browsing and Editing with Reasoning and Explaining for OWL Lite Ontologies , 2004, International Semantic Web Conference.

[17]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Tree visualization with tree-maps: 2-d space-filling approach , 1992, TOGS.

[18]  Akrivi Katifori,et al.  Ontology visualization methods—a survey , 2007, CSUR.

[19]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  The Knowledge Model of Protégé-2000: Combining Interoperability and Flexibility , 2000, EKAW.