The association between on-site cardiac catheterization facilities and the use of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project Investigators.

BACKGROUND During the past decade the use of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction has substantially increased. Among the possible contributing factors, the increasing availability of cardiac catheterization facilities was the focus of our investigation. METHODS We investigated whether the availability of cardiac catheterization facilities at an admitting hospital was associated with the likelihood that a patient would undergo coronary angiography. After adjusting for age, sex, cardiac history, and cardiac complications during hospitalization, we evaluated this association in 5867 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to 19 Seattle-area hospitals. We also assessed the association between the presence of on-site cardiac catheterization facilities and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS Patients admitted to hospitals with on-site cardiac catheterization facilities were far more likely to undergo coronary angiography (odds ratio, 3.21; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.81 to 3.67) than patients admitted to hospitals where transfer to another institution would be required to perform cardiac catheterization. Admission to a hospital with on-site facilities was more strongly associated with the use of coronary angiography than any characteristic of the patient. Although our study had limited power to detect differences in mortality, the availability of coronary angiography had no discernible association with in-hospital mortality rates (odds ratio for mortality among patients admitted to hospitals with on-site facilities vs. patients admitted to hospitals without such facilities, 0.88; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.71 to 1.09). CONCLUSIONS In this community-wide study, the availability of on-site cardiac catheterization facilities was associated with a higher likelihood that a patient would undergo coronary angiography. However, admission to hospitals with these facilities did not appear to be associated with lower short-term mortality.

[1]  J P Roos,et al.  Prognostic Value of Exercise Testing, Coronary Angiography and Left Ventriculography 6–8 Weeks After Myocardial Infarction , 1982, Circulation.

[2]  L. Fisher,et al.  Medical and surgical management of early Q wave myocardial infarction. I. Effects of surgical reperfusion on survival, recurrent myocardial infarction, sudden death and functional class at 10 or more years of follow-up. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  P. Kudenchuk,et al.  Characteristics of black patients admitted to coronary care units in metropolitan Seattle: results from the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry (MITI). , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  J. Robinson,et al.  Market and regulatory influences on the availability of coronary angioplasty and bypass surgery in U.S. hospitals. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  G. Lamas,et al.  A comparison of management patterns after acute myocardial infarction in Canada and the United States. The SAVE investigators. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  E. Gilpin,et al.  Trends in Use of Coronary Angiography in Subacute Phase of Myocardial Infarction , 1991, Circulation.

[7]  B. Hillman,et al.  Frequency and Costs of Diagnostic Imaging in Office Practice‐A Comparison of Self‐Referring and Radiologist‐Referring Physicians , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[9]  A. Gittelsohn,et al.  Small Area Variations in Health Care Delivery , 1973, Science.

[10]  R. Califf,et al.  Prognosis in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction in the interventional era. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  J. Simpson State certificate-of-need programs: the current status. , 1985, American journal of public health.

[12]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Risk stratification and survival after myocardial infarction. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  P. Kudenchuk,et al.  Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project--phase I: patient characteristics and feasibility of prehospital initiation of thrombolytic therapy. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  David J. Feild Guidelines for coronary angiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures (Subcommittee on coronary angiography) , 1987 .