Geometric feature-based multimodal image registration of contrast-enhanced cardiac CT with gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

PURPOSE Cardiac computed tomography (CT) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) provide clinically complementary information in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). Fused anatomical and physiological data acquired sequentially on separate scanners can be coregistered to accurately diagnose CAD in specific coronary vessels. METHODS A fully automated registration method is presented utilizing geometric features from a reliable segmentation of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) volumes, where regions of myocardium and blood pools are extracted and used as an anatomical mask to de-emphasize the inhomogeneities of intensity distribution caused by perfusion defects and physiological variations. A multiresolution approach is employed to represent coarse-to-fine details of both volumes. The extracted voxels from each level are aligned using a similarity measure with a piecewise constant image model and minimized using a gradient descent method. The authors then perform limited nonlinear registration of gated MPS to adjust for phase differences by automatic cardiac phase matching between CT and MPS. For phase matching, they incorporate nonlinear registration using thin-plate-spline-based warping. Rigid registration has been compared with manual alignment (n=45) on 20 stress/rest MPS and coronary CTA data sets acquired from two different sites and five stress CT perfusion data sets. Phase matching was also compared to expert visual assessment. RESULTS As compared with manual alignment obtained from two expert observers, the mean and standard deviation of absolute registration errors of the proposed method for MPS were4.3±3.5, 3.6±2.6, and 3.6±2.1mm for translation and 2.1±3.2°, 0.3±0.8°, and 0.7±1.2° for rotation at site A and 3.8±2.7, 4.0±2.9, and 2.2±1.8mm for translation and 1.1±2.0°, 1.6±3.1°, and 1.9±3.8° for rotation at site B. The results for CT perfusion were 3.0±2.9, 3.5±2.4, and 2.8±1.0mm for translation and 3.0±2.4°, 0.6±0.9°, and 1.2±1.3° for rotation. The registration error shows that the proposed method achieves registration accuracy of less than 1 voxel (6.4×6.4×6.4mm) misalignment. The proposed method was robust for different initializations in the range from -80 to 70, -80 to 70, and -50to50mm in the x-, y-, and z-axes, respectively. Validation results of finding best matching phase showed that best matching phases were not different by more than two phases, as visually determined. CONCLUSIONS The authors have developed a fast and fully automated method for registration of contrast cardiac CT with gated MPS which includes nonlinear cardiac phase matching and is capable of registering these modalities with accuracy<10mm in 87% of the cases.

[1]  D. Berman,et al.  Adenosine myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in women compared with men. Impact of diabetes mellitus on incremental prognostic value and effect on patient management. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  D. Dey,et al.  Image quality and artifacts in coronary CT angiography with dual-source CT: initial clinical experience. , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[3]  Amit Ramesh,et al.  Automated Quality Control for Segmentation of Myocardial Perfusion SPECT , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[5]  Daniel S. Berman,et al.  Myocardial perfusion and function: Single photon emission computed tomography , 2006, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[6]  Piotr J. Slomka,et al.  Automated multi-modality registration of 64-slice coronary CT angiography with myocardial perfusion spect , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[7]  Guido Germano,et al.  "Motion-frozen" display and quantification of myocardial perfusion. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Daniel S. Berman,et al.  An automatic approach to the analysis, quantitation and review of perfusion and function from myocardial perfusion SPECT images , 1997, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.

[9]  Anthony J. Yezzi,et al.  A variational framework for integrating segmentation and registration through active contours , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[10]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Hatem Alkadhi,et al.  Cardiac Image Fusion from Stand-Alone SPECT and CT: Clinical Experience , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  Stephan Achenbach,et al.  Cardiac CT: state of the art for the detection of coronary arterial stenosis. , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[13]  D. Berman,et al.  Comparative use of radionuclide stress testing, coronary artery calcium scanning, and noninvasive coronary angiography for diagnostic and prognostic cardiac assessment. , 2007, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[14]  Piotr J. Slomka,et al.  Multimodality image registration with software: state-of-the-art , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[15]  D. Berman,et al.  Separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography: a clinical validation study. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  Guido Germano,et al.  Applications and software techniques for integrated cardiac multimodality imaging , 2008, Expert review of cardiovascular therapy.

[17]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[18]  Patrick Clarysse,et al.  A review of cardiac image registration methods , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Joachim Hornegger,et al.  Registration of Cardiac SPECT/CT Data Through Weighted Intensity Co-occurrence Priors , 2007, MICCAI.

[20]  Thomas J. Brady,et al.  Cardiac myocardial perfusion imaging using dual source computed tomography , 2009, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[21]  Damini Dey,et al.  Automated image registration of gated cardiac single‐photon emission computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  Russell D Folks,et al.  Three-dimensional fusion of coronary arteries with myocardial perfusion distributions: clinical validation. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  D. Berman,et al.  Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[25]  D. Berman,et al.  Automatic quantitation of regional myocardial wall motion and thickening from gated technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  Paul Suetens,et al.  A viscous fluid model for multimodal non-rigid image registration using mutual information , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[27]  Tatsuo Kumazaki,et al.  Three-dimensional registration of myocardial perfusion SPECT and CT coronary angiography , 2005, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[28]  Arno Buecker,et al.  Validation of QGS and 4D-MSPECT for quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated 18F-FDG PET: comparison with cardiac MRI. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[29]  Hatem Alkadhi,et al.  Validation of a new cardiac image fusion software for three-dimensional integration of myocardial perfusion SPECT and stand-alone 64-slice CT angiography , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.